Well, the 'and announce' section of 'knock and announce' is in dispute according to the guy and neighbors, and the announcing is way more important than the knocking.
Of the sections on the warrant pertaining to the 3003 address; points 8 and 9 appear to be lies, since the post office denied that it was involved in any investigation. "However, Tony Gooden, the U.S. postal inspector in Louisville, said police never contacted his office to verify that information.
Gooden also told WDRB that there were "no packages of interest" going to Taylor's home. He said if LMPD went outside of his jurisdiction to verify information about packages to Taylor's residence, that would be highly unusual and inappropriate."
Lying on a warrant application in two points throws all of the information into doubt. So should I trust rest of the warrant, and should I trust the police saying they announced themselves as police, either?
March 12: Police note in the arrest warrant request that they verified with postal inspectors that Glover was receiving packages at Taylor's address.
May 15: Louisville Postal Inspector Tony Gooden says that his office was not a part of an inspection of possible drug trafficking activity in packages delivered to Breonna Taylor's address.
Stop spreading lies.
No one cared about Juneteenth until Trump: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=juneteenth
It's all in statistics. More whites are killed than blacks. But whites have a higher population so more blacks are killed than whites per capita of each race. But blacks commit more crimes and are killed less often than whites, so more whites are killed than blacks per capita of violent criminals.
Made up numbers so you can walk your way through that previous paragraph pretty easily: Say there's 100 whites, 20 are criminals, 5 are killed. Say there's 50 blacks, 20 are criminals, 4 are killed.
Ah yes, I remember that call for peace. https://youtu.be/5CldSMYYzyw?t=78
That painting just makes me think he smells like wet hot dogs. https://youtu.be/7heceGAdsT0?t=150
I posted this a few days ago: https://thedonald.win/p/FfauQC8e/tara-reades-former-neighbor-demo/
Her old neighbor, whom she directly told the story in 1995 or so and who believes that it happened, plans to vote for Biden and says "I think Biden is an OK guy".
I personally do get annoyed by pictures of text sometimes, but you can just pick out a sentence and search it, or the names 'Khalid' and 'Mary Louise'
NPR had a short interview with Tara Reades former neighbor, because she told her about the assault back in 1995 or so. But this neighbor still plans on supporting Biden and they asked her why...
KHALID: And, Mary Louise, what also caught my ear in speaking with LaCasse is that she describes herself as a strong Democrat. She told me she intends to support Joe Biden in the general election. And I asked her, you know, how she reconciles voting for a man whom she believes assaulted her old friend.
LACASSE: Biden isn't a bad guy. I think he's an OK guy. He just has this - this just happened. It just happened. It did happen.
Pretty sure he doesn't even make those exceptions. Why would the manner in which life was created determine the value (or lack of value) of that life?
And for the first persons comment, just look up "I'm pro-life, change my mind".
I think it's dangerous to equate 'religion' with 'false religion'. "Religion says that Muhammed was a prophet, but my relationship with Jesus disagrees". No, Islam, a false religion, says that, and Christianity, the true religion disagrees. It sounds like you take some humans bad teaching, and equate that to all of 'religion'.
Jesus even specifically tells the pharisees; "And he said to them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written,
“‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’
You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men.” And he said to them, “You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to establish your tradition!"
With this, Jesus is not condemning 'religion', he is condemning 'false religion'.
WHO in response to Trumps travel ban at the beginning of this outbreak: "The Committee does not recommend any travel or trade restriction based on the current information available."
WHO 1 month later: "WE ALL GON' DIE!"
Really wish they weren't (obviously they shouldn't be).
I just recently got my first AR as a home defense gun. If I ever have to use it for that purpose, odds are I am firing it inside my house and will quite possibly temporarily deafen myself (good luck making a phone call, talking to my family, or talking to/recognizing police officers) and permanently damage my hearing. Thanks /s.
The Bible makes sense and is coherent with itself. When things appear to contradict, they don't, but are merely being misinterpreted. How is him citing 6 verses about Jesus being a rock cherry-picking? (And he even missed several.) The verses are right there, you can easily go and read the context. Not to mention that there was not a single paraphrase in his reply.
Now then, if you have 10 clear verses directly saying Christ is the rock, and one verse saying something that could maybe be vaguely interpreted as Peter being the rock IF you don't understand wordplay and the contrast between 'petros' and 'petra'... which interpretation is the safer one? A. The interpretation that builds an entire doctrine off of a pun and contradicts everything else in the Bible about how God's Church will be built, or B. the one that fits in with the rest of the Bible?
I'll take option B.
A radio host I listen to regularly (and do not agree with on everything, particularly eschatology, but that's not important for this) was personal friends with Phil Haney. So much so that when Phil's wife died like a year or two ago, he stayed with this host for a few days, and asked to use the guys radio/tv studio for his wife's memorial service.
Anyway, this past weeks episodes were mostly about Phil, he brought on a lot of guests who also knew him and spoke at conferences and stuff with him, talked to his pastor who is also a personal friend, and his basic gist through all these episodes was, "we don't know what happened, but not a single one of us buys that it was suicide".
He actually had a few ideas besides the deep state; Haney made a lot of muslim enemies for one, also being a conservative radio host he and his guests get flooded with hate-mail and it could be a stalker. Or obviously, it could also be the deep state. But yeah, definitely not suicide, he even flat out said that after Phil's wife died, he was in a dark place for a while and if he were ever going to commit suicide for any reason, that would have been the time to do it, but he didn't. He came out the other side and his life was really starting to pick back up; getting remarried, talks of returning to a job at the DHS under Trump, etc.
He also produced (and is still producing a few more) shows for Phil, those can be found here: http://www.worldviewweekend.com/profile/phil-haney
Yup. Roughly paraphrased He says, "You are 'a pebble', and upon this 'boulder' I will build my church."
It's like they take one slightly confusing bit of wordplay (I think God really likes wordplay, He uses it a lot), and create an entire doctrine....but that doctrine also conflicts with 30 other super-clear verses. (Don't forget Acts 4:11 and it's direct source, Psalms 118:22)
But hey, they have a history of basing doctrine on sketchy sources I suppose; “Luther had made the discovery that the biblical text from the Latin Vulgate, used to support the sacrament of penance, was a mistranslation. The Latin for Matt. 4:17 read pent-tentiam agite, “do penance”, but from the Greek New Testament of Erasmus, Luther had learned that the original meant simply “be penitent.” The literal sense was “change your mind.” “Fortified with this passage, ” wrote Luther to Staupitz in the dedication of the Resolutions, “I venture to say they are wrong who make more of the act in Latin than of the change of heart in Greek.” This was what Luther himself called a “glowing” discovery, In this crucial instance a sacrament of the Church did not rest on the institution of Scripture.” – Roland Bainton “Here I Stand, A Life of Martin Luther“
Historically the Lutheran church calls 'the office of the pope' the anti-christ, and it's pretty easy to see why.
I didn't think of it until I saw this, but I have a hover-over image-expanding extension on my browser, and it does NOT work by hovering over the types of posts you suggest (with the tab). Normally I can hover over the text of the post and it will pop up the image until I mouse off of it, but if it has that tab, it will not pop-up, forcing me to do an extra click on a tiny button.
Sooooo...I don't like this suggestion.
You both should just take the middle ground and become Lutheran!