There are various degrees of taint depending on the field. Some fields are 100% bullshit and the only science they have is pretend science, this is mostly true for social sciences, particularly gender studies and other marxist tripe. Next up are the fields that depend to the largest extent on political funding, particularly when their findings are politically relevant. The worst offender is climate science, which ends up being 90% bullshit. Politicized science is not science. Medicine is a mixed bag, and also depends on what field you're looking at, but probably is around 20-30% bullshit.
It's all such total bullshit. They don't "believe in science", they don't know what peer review is or entails. They just throw this bullshit around to sound smart while rejecting ideas they don't like. The funniest thing happens when you present them with "peer reviewed" papers that don't support their views. Suddenly peer review isn't all it's cracked up to be and your proof can be safely ignored.
Why do y'all like hating on Pool so much? I don't really care about his politics (he's a kinda centrist leaning social democrat as far as I can tell - but he did vote for Trump), but I do care about his fair news reports and commentary, and his interviews are interesting. He does a good job of showing up the libtards he has on from time to time. He's done us a good service on the balance. Give it a rest.
Not sure why you're getting down voted. It's true. "Record support among minorities" is a cringe boomercon talking point. It's technically true - the best kind of true. Yes, Candace Owens is real. Blexit is real. Yes yes yes. But we're still talking rookie numbers here.
And exterminated / forced out all the Germans. But Prussia != Lithuania, you forget north Eastern Poland.