8
Squeaker 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wait until you can't be called a birthing person because that's also non inclusive and some kinda phobic. Honk honk.

1
Squeaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because I can be supportive of Trump and trust he is fighting the good fight regarding election fraud/swamp rats, etc while still also disagreeing with him on other things? Just because I believe he has America's interests at heart doesn't mean I believe he is a God or doesn't make mistakes. I also disagree with him on sec 230, but still think he should lead us for 4 more years.

I don't see how that's believing 2 conflicting stances.

5
Squeaker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Omg I'm glad I've not been paying attention to him. That was pathetic to watch lmao.

6
Squeaker 6 points ago +6 / -0

What's the deal with Beck? I've never really paid attention to him. I've heard negative things about him, but never knew why.

7
Squeaker 7 points ago +8 / -1

Why isn't Hawley included? Wasn't he the first one to step up to the plate?

13
Squeaker 13 points ago +13 / -0

Wasn't that Lude guy saying something about this on gtv a while back?

1
Squeaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, I disagree with you. I'm not sure what "requirements of life" you've decided equate a living organism, but a zygote operates differently than any old cell. A zygote directs its own development from that single cell all the way through full development. A simple cell does not. The fact that it requires a womb to do so does not negate the fact that it lives. Every living being requires a certain type of environment to live and cannot function without it. That would be like saying you aren't alive because you cannot function in space as you do on earth. That's stupid.

Also, what does varied strategies for reproduction have to do with any of this? I'm not disputing that other organisms reproduce differently than humans?

4
Squeaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Then we disagree. If it doesn't begin there, then where does it begin? Single celled organisms are considered living/alive, but humanity doesn't get the same definition of life?

1
Squeaker 1 point ago +3 / -2

No morning after pill. That's just abortion by meds. If life truly begins at conception, you have to be preventative meaning close your legs or stop the sperm from getting in by other methods.

1
Squeaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone commented somewhere that she's a scientologist. Not sure if thats accurate or not, but it was in the rumor mill.

2
Squeaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn't rely on Twitter for history anyway.

1
Squeaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately those in mass exodus from Cali aren't just the red ones. The blue ones who see cheaper housing are also polluting other states now that everyone is remote working.

1
Squeaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can't speak for OP, but my kids pediatrician just asked us if we were getting it and was shocked when I told him no. He already got his.

In fact, there are a lot of people in the medical field who are terribly inept and uninformed who buy up this bulllshit.

3
Squeaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah no joke. Who knew being able to pay your bills, put food on the table, and having positive peer relationships would translate to positive emotions and good mental health? How dare we challenge "duh science."

3
Squeaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also due to the separation they've enacted on families and friends. Humans are social creatures. They need interaction with one another, not through a screen.

23
Squeaker 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's all part of the plan. Create weak, soyfilled, neutered, and mentally deranged cucks. They cannot fight or stand up for themselves and must rely on the government for everything. Women aren't attracted to that hot mess either so the nuclear family is also destroyed, creating future generations of dependent losers.

4
Squeaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Merry Christmas everyone!

5
Squeaker 5 points ago +6 / -1

This. If everyone is too cucked, it's impossible get anything local and not support big box traitors.

We need people to just stand together and refuse to enforce this nonsense.

43
Squeaker 43 points ago +48 / -5

Came here for this. F out of here with that bs. We open without stipulations.

Besides, the safety guidelines change as often as they have to dilate. This is not a huge win.

6
Squeaker 6 points ago +8 / -2

This is one thing on which I disagree with Trump. I think it would be a bad idea to get rid of 230. I think it needs appropriate enforcement and perhaps ammendments, but complete annihilation would be kill the little guy.

1
Squeaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Re: Redpill Idk, I wasn't on tdw during the last porkulus bill, but the world was watching then too. Not sure how many true converts we really got.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›