The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

or to the people.

That would be us. See also: amendment #2.

Thanksgiving is a proud celebration of a glorious conquest.

Let them seethe.

Something something back something something by

This is true, and it's federal law. It's one of the explicit questions on the 4473.

Though I do have mixed feelings, on account of the fact that it's a gun law, and therefore it's an infringement.

In other words, the creator of the child mutilation industry was literally Dr. Money.

You can't make this stuff up, folks.

Fun fact: Joe Biden was the turkey originally slated for pardoning, but as he has been missing for days and is possibly dead, they had to go to the backup turkey.

If you can't turn the MSM off completely for some reason, I find it helps to pretend they are being ironic.

Fox News actually still kind of works as a 24/7 SNL skit. Just pretend they are a parody of CNN, rather than a newly created copy of it.

Are they even pretending that the alcohol bans are backed by some kind of evidence?

Also, what the hell is up with the curfews? (COVID-19: it mostly comes out at night. Mostly.)

Admittedly, I was being kind of flippant. There is wisdom in what you just said.

This but unironically.

Dow approaching 32,768! 16-bits by December 16!!!

Agreed, though he was running against freaking Gore. Our options were limited.

Also, the full scope of the fuckening didn't become clear until after 9/11 when he handed the whole country over to the deep state.

I know that there are at least a few states where otherwise legal mail ins have to be discarded when the voter passes away prior to election day -- and I know that they are pretty good about enforcing this (no surprise, since the elderly are more likely to die, and they skew conservative).

Presumably the same thing would apply to voters convicted of a felony between casting a vote and election day. Something tells me this is less strictly enforced.

Not worth doing. Everyone with a brain has already turned off the mainstream media, and abandoned traditional radio and television mediums along with it. He'd just be broadcasting to the enemy.

Better to come openly post here. The written format is better for establishing rally points and action plans anyway, and this forum is also better suited for electing the required militia officer corps.

"Law enforcement" is only synonymous with "the police" under two conditions:

1. The police make a good faith attempt to enforce the laws that exist.
2. The police do NOT attempt to enforce laws they made up on the spot.

There are many areas of the country where one or both of those conditions has not been met -- in most cases because the chief law enforcement officer for a state (ie the governor) has either completely failed to do their job (looking at you Oregon), mistaken themselves for a dictator (looking at you, Washington state), or both (shout out to New York state).

We should not incite initiation of violence.

We should be prepared to meet violence with violence, and make no mistake, a bloodless coup is still a violent act.

Turns out that requiring universal licensing and registration to have a virus doesn't actually prevent people from getting the virus illegally.

Next they will try doubling penalties, expanding police powers to strip search you for concealed virus, national publicity campaigns about the dangers of virus-crime, and collection buckets where you can turn your virus particles in no questions asked. That should work, right?

This isn't totally contradictory. They care about children, women, minorities and the environment -- in other words slaves and land. Money and power are great ways to secure these values.

This is just a trivia point, but I am genuinely curious: are there actually any laws on the books that explicitly prevent dead people from voting? This strikes me as one of those areas that is so obvious no one bothers to outlaw it until someone actually goes full retard and does it.

As a practical matter being dead makes it really hard to register and actually cast a vote, so at least the vast majority of votes by dead people are certainly fraudulent for reasons unrelated to them being dead -- specifically someone else is fraudulently registering and casting the vote.

Still, it makes me wonder. Are there any edge cases where a dead person could in fact cast a legally valid vote?

Literally the same thing he did to try and control the mosquito population, now that I think about it.

This dude really is all about viral sterilization, isn't he?

I didn't say that, but it wasn't a bunch of individuals either.

There is a world of difference between even a half a dozen guys operating as a team, and six individuals.

A person alone making a stand against a team of law enforcement, in a known location, where they pick the time of engagement, can at best become a martyr.

There are also rumors that be has access to some kind of large computerized "social media" platform that has considerable amounts of data and uses predictive algorithms to influence people's behaviors.

I'm sure that is just a crazy conspiracy theory though. I mean, a database of half the people on the planet and everyone they interact with? That's pretty far fetched.

Indians are Asian.

This is a very interesting way to think about it -- the false positive snowball effect.

If you plug in the false positive rate of the test you could use exactly the same math that they use to predict the spread of an epidemic disease, and calculate the growth in false positives over time.

It's funny because this would spread exponentially, just like a real disease.

Probably because his family won't let him come home for the holidays, so he things no one's should.