1
Stable-Genius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now not that I have any faith in the courts but I dont think forcing the confinement of someone with force or penalty can be enforced by executive action. Lord knows that won't stop these tyrannical pedos though.

1
Stable-Genius 1 point ago +1 / -0

No you cannot if they determine that it is a certain kind of forest or a certain kind of animal lives there, or if you clearing land would cause runoff into a creek that would kill fish etc. Basically you can if you meet all these conditions, which are impossible to meet for the basic person. If you are a massive corp and can pay lawyers millions to get them to approve your projects then you can do them.

God help you if they find a red legged frog in your ag pond.

The best thing about the fires is when you get burnt to the ground you were allowed 18 months to make all the roads you wanted on your property or cut down trees and stuff and they agreed not to care for that time. You wouldn't believe how hard it is to make a road on your own property.

3
Stable-Genius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well op said he was Canadian, but in California you can sue, political belief is a protected class. It highly depends on states.

Not that I think you would get anywhere with CA judges though, they are fucked in the head, but you can sue.

2
Stable-Genius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and if it isn't cleared by man it will be cleared by a fire. Native Americans knew this for thousands of years and would regularly burn the land. If it dosent build up the fire dosent linger and get hot enough to catch the big trees on fire.

1
Stable-Genius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Us land owners want to (and do illegallt to some extent) clear the shit out but they have whole fucking teams of assholes in priuses looking at sat images for any changes to the forest, and they will follow equipment being moved and come on to your property without a permission to fine you and the courts will back them up. You live life in fear of the eco warriors working for the government.

2
Stable-Genius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well both of them are kinda correct, there is a lot of arson here in Northern CA, small town where I live has a couple dozen instances a year of crackhead lighting fires and burning fields. They have caught people that did burn quite a bit, but this year as in 2008 there were a lot of lightning fires started, those were of course, out in the sticks.

However the fires that burned a lot of homes in the last few years were mostly started by pg&e lines blowing down in high wind conditions. These lines often run near highways for maintenance purposes and because they are close to the population centers.

People don't realize just how many fires there are every season. Its thousands not a dozen. Only a dozen or so get to the size it makes national news though.

13
Stable-Genius 13 points ago +14 / -1

I think I buy it, this whole show, even if it does nothing to trump is giving pretext for the state level assholes to go after trump for his "crimes". Maybe I'm wrong but I think this is not just about 2024 but a signal to anyone like trump to stay out of politics and not cross them.

1
Stable-Genius 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what matters, android itself is not the big problem its the device manufacturers and Google that add shit to it that makes it bad.

10
Stable-Genius 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think a series of unique digits on the forearm is the way to go. Works well.

2
Stable-Genius 2 points ago +2 / -0

I highly doubt my ag will do shit because he was just appointed to bidens cabinet lmao.

22
Stable-Genius 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yet another reason to drive classic cars. Cars without computers are more fun anyways. Also better for the environment if you dont buy a new Mercedes every other year.

1
Stable-Genius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its a shame helicopter rides are not being implemented but firing squads seem appropriate for now

9
Stable-Genius 9 points ago +9 / -0

Its so important we voted for trump in the numbers we did. Forced them to show their hand. The only reason they didn't win in 2016 was they totally believed they didn't need to cheat.

9
Stable-Genius 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yea if these machines were connected to the internet, we can assume they were accessed by foreign enemies. Especially if the goddam password was really "elecadmin" or whatever

1
Stable-Genius 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the biggest factor for me, even if there was no massive global coordinated effort (I think there was), it is impossible to believe that these people we have witnessed suffer horribly from TDS would not cheat at any level they were capable of.

The worst bit is they probably convinced themselves they were doing it to save the country from evil trump.

How would someone who spent the last 4 years with trump living rent free in their heads driving them mad, not put some ballots in the wrong pile?

2
Stable-Genius 2 points ago +2 / -0

I cant wait until we see the video footage of Stacy abrams going into the bathroom in question and some photos of the smashed toilet that caused the leak

4
Stable-Genius 4 points ago +4 / -0

They need to get that cash flowing in the Clinton Foundation. For the children of Haiti of course...

2
Stable-Genius 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a good point, if you ask for records from "joe biden" they will give you clean records.

They will probably just say it is not a gov phone, although I can't imagine a sitting VP is allowed to use a non gov phone

12
Stable-Genius 12 points ago +12 / -0

The dude didn't bring anything of $1m value other than selling out the white house.

For that, $1m is a steal to be fair.

view more: Next ›