This is not a good article and it certainly isn't conclusive. Please don't spread this.
The shooter in the video looks like he has a different hair line (much larger forehead and hairline on the sides looks much further back) and head shape. The bracelet could be something that several of his coworkers have.
Nothing that was shown from his FB page indicated maliciousness.
I am not sure putting all of your money in a Trump bank would be the best idea. I won't be surprised if the government confiscates everything Trump owns at some point.
Whatever you do, good luck!
Look how they reacted to what happened on the 6th. I would bet that she wants to remove Trump to get us more agitated so we do something stupid. Then they can crackdown even more.
I believe there is still an avenue but I wouldn’t be surprised if I am wrong and I wouldn’t hold it against trump if there is one and he doesn’t take it.
Thanks for the reply.
So you missed the part about how the people will never have a chance to choose again except maybe after a successful revolution?
The people already know why we need someone like Trump, thats why he won in a landslide. If it didn't do any good now I do not believe it will do any good in 2024.
Where has Flynn alluded to this? I would be much more inclined to believe it if I saw that.
I don't think that is from today. I saw a video that looks very similar to the image a few weeks ago.
So you know something big went down once you wake up in the morning and check the news? Great, thanks.
You think bitcoin will increase in value if Trump cracks down on the CCP? What’s your reasoning?
Ok, I decided to skim the document rather than wait for someone hear to answer. The document appears to be only the opinions of the justices. There are 7 justices named and 3 opinions documented. If I am reading correctly, the majority appears to agree with the plaintiffs (republicans). The document does not look to indicate what the remedy will be.
So this looks like something from the plaintiffs and it is information we already know. The the court actually make a decision?
That is a good point. Didn't the PA legislators request the SC to decertify their states certification though? I agree that the legislators could've done something, if they actually cared. The fact that the executive branch of these states bypassed laws enacted by the legislators is hopefully enough basis for the SC to take the case. The fact that the legislators are impotent doesn't nullify the fact that the law was broken and voters in other states may have incurred injury.
Fake.