I hope some Republican Senator or Representative offers this man a job immediately because integrity is rare and we need leaders like this man to remain active as a counselor in making policy decisions.
I would not consider NdGT an elite physicist by any means. He advocates antropogenic CO2 as a critical element of climate change. Yet the RFek forcing valuations for key greehouse gases (ghg's) under the well established and stipulated laws of thermodynamics easily proves the CO2 fears are a hoax.
Yes I would challange NdGT in court with the following baseline calculations:
Climate is 288.8°K > |0|°K Climate attributed to ALL GHG's is only 16.3°K Therefore GHG's account for only 5.644% of climate.
Among GHG's..
H2O/water accounts for 25,000 ppm w/an RFek value of 1.00 unit per molecule, and therefore 25,000 RFek units/mp
CO2 equals 410 ppm x 1.94 RFek value per molecule for 795 RFek units/mp. And only 29% is anthropogenic.
CH4/methane or cow farts (actually all rotting organics worldwide) add <2 ppm at 1.52 RFek units/mp.
All other GHGs add about 3 more RFek units/mp.
So of all GHG's perhaps 238 RFek units out of about 25,800 total GHG RFek units are anthropogenic change over 125 years.
238/25,800 x 16.3°K/288.8°K = human C🦶
= .00052°K.
Of a 1°K change in climate > p-125 yrs, 99.948% of the change has nothing to do with anthropogenic CO2. The math is irrefutable since those constants are stipulated factors approved by NASA, NOAA and the IPCC.
That is just one way we know the CO2 alarm is a hoax. There are several ways to arrive at the same results including the use of atomic weight equivalents incorporated into a ratio algorithm. That method produces the same limited AGW result within +/- 2% of the above.
NdGT is towing a political line, but physicists and astronomers, geologists, botanists and paleo climate scientists simply do not agree with what is easily disputed as a farce. We don't even know if the CO2 count was 285 back in 1895 because modern climate model writers decided to cull that number from the bottom third of over one hundred experiments run at the end of the 19th century.
One reason we know that is an error is the botanical extinction paradox. Botanists have discovered that over 1/3rd of plant species simply cannot survive below 200 ppm. Yet climate scientists keep insisting that ice age CO2 levels were in the 160-180 ppm range based on ice core studies.
If so, why did the earth not suffer a 1/3 loss of all botanical species enduring ice ages? The logical answer is CO2 sublimation loss. In other words, ice cores while consistent in storing data, do not store 100% of A-CO2 during the long event trapping processes that eventually become the source of the ice cores. Ignoring CO2 sublimation during the long course of each trapping event causes an estimate understatement of 33-50% of actual CO2 in the ice core. Adjusting the ice cores as physicists suggest, means actual CO2 levels in the last 3 million years was likely 50-80 ppm higher than previously thought. Such an understatement coupled with revisiting the real CO2 in A back in 1895 means the human impact on CO2 is likely no more than half of what could be calculated above.
NdGT...how did you get a doctorate?
Who's pork was she roasting?
I was questioning it in March of 2020. Case in point. A purported pandemic that detects Corona virus, 10 thousand variants of it in nature are everywhere, arises and kills 600,000 people, but total deaths in the U.S. decreased by 20,000 in the year 2020. Where did all re real cause of death cases go? Heart disease, stroke, bicycle accident. Sorrosis of the liver, meningitis, heart attack, suicide by mother-in-law, arkansides, all of it? Funny how deaths in ALL THOSE CATEGORIES DROPPED DRAMATICALLY but COVID killed THE SAME NUMBER of people instead.
So hypothetically, she is advocating a criminal culture be allowed unabated. In such a culture, wouldn't she also be in far more danger from criminal behavior like the rest of us? Or does she still get government funded police protection while we don't. Seems like a ridiculous idea on her part.
6 million vaccines were issued, 6 rare blood disorders occurred, all in women. It seems more likely researches will find other commonalities such as all take the same other medication or eat the same food or possibly used the same brand hair color. 6 in six million us a very low incidence rate. I want to take the Johnson and Johnsin vaccine because it is a more traditional biological Architecture. This is disturbing ggv because it seems like a very few bureaucrats are helping a very specific group of companies to profit from a condition they may well have had a back hand in developing.
According to the Bill Mahr interpretation of events, apparently so. In a similar light, Disney Corporation at odds over its liberal position that there should be no boarders continues to maintain walls and ticket booths at its Orlando Florida Parks and keeps California parks boarded up because it s Board of Directors cannot resolve the problem of duplicitous Socialism I'm competition with material capitalism.
And he would be 100% correct.
It's what happens when people in government say, "Trust us!" Then you foolishly trust them. Government is often just organized crime with better PR.
Let's start by reintroducing math (it's not racist), science (ozone holes and CO2 earth baking are hoaxes), and both world and U.S. History. Oh wait, U.S. History is that DEMOCRATS supported slavery, founded the KKK, wrote Jim Crow, opposed Civil Rights, Murdered M.L. King...an awakening is in order and they love Karl Marx big-time!
The milage tax would be unconstitutional. The U.S.C establishment of the commerce clause was just one of several parts of the constitution that forbade states and the federal government from numbering the citizen's rights of passage. While a gas tax applies to fuel that can be used to transport, the direct levy on miles driven is a certain infringement in the peoples rights to move freely about the mention and without encumbrances. It cannot be considered constitutional. At some point SCOTUS needs to step forth and recognize that government is servant of the people, not the other way around.
I am beginning to think they keep substituting the word "dog" in place of "president" for these stories.
Some say hours. Others only seconds.
What happens to the citizen under the Bill of Rights when those swarn to uphold those rights are given a free pass to violate them in every way? America died at the hand if another Gadianton, a judge that put illegal twisting of a false legal doctrine in the way of constitutional trust. The judges in this case should be disbarred for obviously not knowing on whose side the law was supposed to protect from big invasive government, and whose innocence was at stake. Rosenstein and Holder both knew they were breaking the law. It was the courts responsibility to FIND perfection in Attkinson's prosecution, not technicalities to dismiss liability in a bureaucrat's defense.
Always coming in a truck or van. When will they learn that although it requires more round trips, arriving in a Porsche, Audi, Caddy, Lincoln, Mercedes or BMW is far more likely to help you gain that tourist visa you so desperately desire. Arriving in a beat up deliver van, semi-trailor or Chevy pick-up is all the wrong kind of attention getter. 😉
Wouldn't Plague #2 be Socialist-Marxist Dogma since just in the last 104 years it has claimed over 150 million lives and spawned wars globally by those bastards that want to enslave. We the People of ALL nations don't need Joseph Engles, V.I. Lenin or Dr. Fauci to tell us the cure is cut their balls off and shove them down their throats. I for one am done with plutocrats tracking dirt on the Bill of Rights over an illness most people will not get, and over 99% that do won't die.
What gave him/her away?
Licences Plate Mustang Both
Any answer is correct!
I think it's a true statement she left Honduras because of starvation...as she caused a famine. Having done that, she has come to America where she has not yet caused starvation or a famine, but you can do anything if you try hard enough in America.
Listen carefully to all the 💩 white elitest liberals have told us during the past few years:
-
If you are Black, math is racist (i.e. you are too stupid to do math so you should not try and should never become a builder, mathematician, actuary, scientist, engineer, nurse, physician, researcher, airline pilot, programmer, or accountant (thus never work for Boeing), BUT, you can flip burgers and carry bags at the SeTac International Airport.
-
If you are Black you are too damned dumb to find a bus schedule, visit a DMV or apply for a drivers license, BUT you can stand in lines to collect cheese. Food stamps/EBT Cards, and get listed for placement in Section 8 or other public housing.
-
If you are Black you cannot possibly learn to speak the English Language or any other foreign language because that requires application of linguistic practice and semantic structure, but you can rap and make shit up that degrades other people, elevates pushing, pimping and whordomes and institutes a level of social equality such that the prostitute and the nurse are essentially equal and accepting government handouts is not the same as slavery.
Personally, I do not like the liberals making these decisions. I know many people of color who live in and are part of the supposedly white society, people who are scientists, engineers, physicians, lawyers, business giants, all 8f whom happen to also be by race, black.
Why people if color tolerate the negative stereotyping of race by white liberals is simply beyond me.
Holy 💩 on a 🍕, China has spoken the unthinkable truth, except the truth flies in the face of the DEMOCRAT PARTY'S 95 Thesis of Truth. What will DEMOCRATS do? Can the DP condemn China and still pander to the perverted left of the left? This will be almost as fun to watch as a Joe Biden press conference in which he uses the 'N' word, sniffs a coworker, refers to his Veep as President Obama and then calls upon us to reverse his returning the White House to a palace if dgnity post Melania. That should be fun.
🤔
Shouldn't the Maricopa County be arresting the officials that illegally ordered the ballots shredded on a variety of conspiracy to defraud or at minimum of malfeasance in record protection demanded by both federal and state law?
The law breaking seems to be on the part of the MCo election office, not a man collecting evidence of the fraud and exposing the criminal malfeasance that was discarded into the public waste receptical.
We know the world has become a Marxist State when the crime is exposing corruption and not the actual corruption.
Now if we could just get this done at 300 public airports. CNN's viewership would drop from 319 to 19.
🤣
So Trump went to a foreign country (The People's Democratic Union of New Amsterdam) to do some business. 😉
RFek is radio frequency gain that forces the addition of kinetic energy within the atmosphere.
The forcing values of each GHG molecule is established by the laws of physics post laboratory experimentation. Since 1998, the original forcing value for a molecule of CO2 was 2.011, but the NOAA, NASA and IPCC recently resolved and revised the value to 1.94. Water vapor (H2O) also a far more significant GHG has a value of 1.00.
H2O in the atmosphere = 25,000 ppm CO2 in the atmosphere = 410 ppm
Now when you measure how important GHGs are to total climate, you realize that only 16.3°K of 288.8°K >|0|°K comes from GHG RFek forcing.
Of that, 25,000 x 1.00 ek units is from H2O., and 410 x 1.94 ek comes from CO2 and remember less than 30% of ek from CO2 is human caused.
That means the heat forcing of H2O is by an RFek factor of 25,000, while...
The heat forcing factor of CO2 when including methane (CH4 / cow farts) is only about 800.
So you can do the algorithm.
16.3°K/288.8°K x 800/25,800 × 3/10th (being generous here)...
That represents the total CO2 related climate change caused by humans over the last 125 years...
About 0.00052°K out of a purported 1°K (or C) change in the last 125 years. Ot means NATURE is responsible for 99.99848% of climate change.
No getting past the physics and those are easily validated in other ways. The laws of Thermodynamics will not change just because they are politically inconvenient for the Marxist left.