It means someone who has changed their clothes, which is all someone can change. Transgender is a lie.

Bonus: they will all hate it so much.

If I go to any website, my phone at least tries to go before failing but now it does not even give any indication of attempting to go to parler.com. It just acts like nothing happened when I type it in.

If only you believe hard enough anything can come true.

This is a lie. Success comes from hard work, not hard believing. Though there may have been actual doomers who were trying to discourage supporters, some of us just always expected it to turn it like this because that is how it generally does turn out. Meme energy is real, but billionaires owning politicians is also real.

I hope we have not seen the last gasp of American greatness these past four years, but if we just sit around and complain about how it is all unfair we will not accomplish much. We need to be planning how we will save the Republic, not whining or lying about "tick-tock".

Stream it on the internet. We can all go through it.

Benford's law only applies where numbers smoothly increase without artificial limits either up or down. For instance, the average sit down restaurant bill does not follow Benford's law because one person rarely dines alone and two people or more rarely can eat for less than $20.

Where it works great is something like odometer readings.

It does not work for ages because people rarely live past 99 but often live past 19. It does not work for birthdays because the same number of people are born on any given day of the month.

So we can consider whether the numbers being analyzed are under this law. The number of people who vote per precinct might be if it freely increases above 99 or better yet above 999. The number of people who voted for a specific candidate by definition cannot follow Benford's law. Why not? Because if total voters does follow it, then a percent of voters cannot follow it. That would be a contradiction.

You might help prove fraud if you could think of a number to analyze that just goes up and up like total voters in a state and is not a percent of a larger number like total Trump voters in a state.

The main thing Benford's Law shows is where people are making up numbers out of thin air. If the fraud involves physical fraud, it may follow Benford's law since people had to make the fake ballots one by one.

One possible analysis would be number of mail in votes in each area. If you really want to help, compile spreadsheets with the data, share them, and let everyone analyze.

They cooperated with China where all this fraud was produced. But China did it not to help the democrats but so that they could release evidence afterward leading to an American civil war, to bring down our country. The fraud is so obvious on purpose. They will release just enough evidence to convince Trump supporters beyond question but not so much that the average democrat believes it, particularly with the media hiding all the evidence.

There is no winning if we prove that fraud because it only results in civil war. There is no obvious path to a unified America and that is our biggest problem right now.

It would have spoiled the plandemic.

He seems like a guy who tells the truth. His attacks on the president are policy disagreements. He is wrong, but not a liar. His response to the current fake news was just so honest and simple, almost amazed that such a lie should be believed. I wish all our opponents were like him.

Too many people seem to think that they would rather throw communists out of helicopters than win the election this year.

I like that he does not throw political enemies out of helicopters, and I like that he is using the rules of law despite having the whole deep state against him. He does not stoop to evil even when fighting evil, even when some people on this site would rather have a fascist dictator like Pinochet.

But also...

• That property is people's livelihood,
• And the person trying to burn it down is making us choose between their life and our property
• That property is owned by someone who risked their life to earn it, whether as a cop, a taxi driver, or an Alaskan fisherman. Work is dangerous.
• Replacing property would require more risk to life. Even with insurance money, construction is a risky job.

The basic issue is that Kolfage and Bannon were paid. This would normally be okay, but they made a big deal of not being paid. Our president can do that because he is a billionaire and Mother Teresa could do it because she is a saint but normal people cannot work hard and give lots of their time and never be paid for it.

This is the lesson: if you start something good for MAGA don't be afraid to say you will take a salary for it. We want you to succeed. Saying "I won't take a penny" sounds nice but is impractical.

Now that we know that her mother was the one who filled the police report, I am suspicious that this was all just to draw attention to her documentary.

I am not claiming to know, just going to be more patient and see how it develops.

I love how they want us to say, "Oh, just a couple Bibles...to start a larger fire. Just that."

I am not going to link to the story of course. It is written in their usual racist style.

We are starting to see memes about wishing the dam would overflow. Don't let the politics make you a monster. Millions would die.