-19
StayGoldDonnyBoy -19 points ago +2 / -21

You’re right. It’s in the video. She tries to grab the phone from the BLM woman, but accidentally hits her in the face. THEN she gets clocked.

3
StayGoldDonnyBoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hypotheses on what “The Kraken” is?

Personally, i think it’s the NSA’s recordings of communications from democrat leaders. We know they have records of everything, but perhaps The Kraken is Trump finally having enough probably cause to go into the records and pull out the damning communications.

Perhaps the 2018 EO allows Ratcliffe to utilize those Patriot Act tools on the pretense of investigating the foreign influence in our elections and catch these slimy Dems communicating with China and Iran and Venezuela.

Other ideas?

1
StayGoldDonnyBoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m calling for every Democrat and RINO senator to be lobotomized until they can make an informed decision to be a communist or a patriot.

8
StayGoldDonnyBoy 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is definitely part of the plan to utilize the EO, right?

1
StayGoldDonnyBoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can’t citizens of these states file a class action lawsuit against the state for disenfranchising their votes by circumventing the states’ constitutions?

24
StayGoldDonnyBoy 24 points ago +24 / -0
  1. 17 plus Texas is 18, and 8 more is 26. Right?
2
StayGoldDonnyBoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rudy should tweet: “Thanks for not being a crackhead, son“

2
StayGoldDonnyBoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Southern states in the 1960s: “Hey SCOTUS, giving black people rights is a box we won’t be able to close. Please let us southern governors decide what’s best.

2
StayGoldDonnyBoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, guys. I agree. If we let 9 qualified federal justices interpret and rule on the constitution of the United States as opposed to a state governor, we will destroy America.

Do you think we can just let this same Supreme Court get involved every time the constitution is shat on?

It’s a danger to democracy.

1
StayGoldDonnyBoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boom. I can’t think of any other reason those wouldn’t have return addresses on them then. That’s huge.

3
StayGoldDonnyBoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do we have a datestamp for this video? I’m such a cynic, so i immediately try to think of the other explanation—why this isn’t as huge as we expect.

The only thing i can imagine is that this is from earlier in the year and this woman is putting the envelopes together to SEND to voters. Maybe this is why the envelopes don’t have return addresses because they go inside the larger envelopes that is mailed to voters.

At 1:28, boxes have dates of June 9.

I want this to be what we think it is, but could there be another explanation?

1
StayGoldDonnyBoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is huge. Is there any other explanation for this though? Could those envelopes be blank because this is from the summer before they were assembled and mailed to voters?

Do we have a datestamp on this video?

3
StayGoldDonnyBoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m really skeptical of this supposed testimony. In another thread, someone linked to the witness’s website “voterga”. The testimony was linked on the page.

Unless this is a sworn affidavit, i don’t think this is “happening” yet.

2
StayGoldDonnyBoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that reporter got played. Someone here linked to “voterga” of which the supposed witness was a founder— the site looks sparse and the supposed testimony isn’t an affidavit to my knowledge.

Personally, i need something more concrete before i can believe this to be true. However, Stacy Abrams if true.

edit i looked at the website (voterga.org) more. It’s quite extensive— likely not a LARP. However, with no testimony today and the linked testimony (https://voterga.org/events/) not necessarily being a sworn affidavit, i think we should stay cautious.

6
StayGoldDonnyBoy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Did he give a testimony today? Do you know if this pdf on the voterga website is also in an affidavit?

I could set up a sparse website and write up a statement similar to this.

edit i looked at the website some more. It looks quite extensive and not a LARP. Still, since the guy never testified and since we don’t know if the statement was also made as a sworn affidavit, i think it’s better to err on the side of caution.

48
StayGoldDonnyBoy 48 points ago +48 / -0

We’re getting a lot of compelling testimonies this way. I like this tactic. We’re about 30 people in telling similar stories of impropriety. If the panel goes until 7, like AZ, then we might hear from 100 people today??

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›