1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that was pretty weird. I think it might set a new precedent, however. Dems will always claim it isn't over until they can "find enough votes". It's some real banana republic shit. :/

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

The world feels for her highness in her time of need. I wonder if Huma can console her. :D

9
SteelDriver 9 points ago +9 / -0

Have you ever seen One-eyed Willie and Dan Crenshaw in the same room together? :D

1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

To the leftists who are immersed in their own propaganda, anyone right of Bernie is "far-right" or "alt-right". :/

1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus Fucking Christ. Why? Great, Mitch, you'll get one begrudging 'moderate' in the New York Times to praise your 'bipartisanship' and then they'll return to curb-stomping conservatism and calling you a Nazi again.

4
SteelDriver 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's interesting that a left-majority Supreme Court is not a problem, but as soon as the right plays by the same rules as the left and gains a majority on the court, it is "a problem" and the court's "legitimacy" is questioned and there are calls to 'restore' "ideological balance." The left are just the whiny bitches that take their ball and go home when they lose a single game (after winning so many times due to the rules slanted in their favor).

1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cue the line from that faggoty Hamilton play leftists love: "You’re gonna need congressional approval and you don’t have the votes."

4
SteelDriver 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks to all those who've toed the line for freedom. I hope future Americans will demand leadership only ask that ultimate sacrifice for truly worthy causes.

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

They've got to destroy our history before they rewrite it. Fucking assholes.

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

...but, but, we were just told they wanted to take it down and donate it to an "appropriate venue." Fuck these anti-American fascists.

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I think it's the one registrar. I think AR15.com (among many other right-leaning sites) uses it as well.

40
SteelDriver 40 points ago +40 / -0

Is Twitter gonna tag this as "misinformation"? Are they going to tag everything previously recommending 12-29 year old boys take the Moderna vaccine as "misinformation"? It has to be one or the other based on their own precedent, right?

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hubris of the modern left is unmatched in history. They will do right what everyone else has done wrong in the past.

16
SteelDriver 16 points ago +16 / -0

Trump will probably have to buy his own DNS registrar, too, the way things are going.

3
SteelDriver 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope this thing succeeds. It would be nice to spit in the eye of the Big Tech oligarchs.

1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

...yeah, that sounds about right for our current global political climate. The "black = good, white = bad" isn't "anti-racism," it's "counter-racism."

3
SteelDriver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nothing says "America" quite like requiring papers to enter a restaurant or movie theater. :/

10
SteelDriver 10 points ago +10 / -0

I want to take my daughter to see a professional orchestra (she started playing the bass last year and is really interested in it). Unfortunately, all of them near me not only require masks, but proof of vaccination for everyone 12 and up. This shit really pisses me off.

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was this supposed to be some sort of KKK rally? If so, it's such a threat to national security that I didn't even know about it, until reading about this.

1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's very odd when many doctors have stated since this started that the main reason no previous coronavirus (such as the common cold) has a vaccine is because coronavirus vaccines are inherently leaky and drive faster mutation rates. ...just like we're seeing now. Very odd, indeed.

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Patriot Post delivers. Again. :)

5
SteelDriver 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yes, but only until they rule against something we like, then they're persona non grata again. :D

I don't know that I'd agree with the premise of the article. Sometimes, justices seem to be critical of something during questioning and end up going the other way with their decision (maybe they sometimes play devil's advocate).

view more: Next ›