I long for a day when former CNN employees live in terror that someone will discover their past association with the former propaganda producer.
The only reason I bother with thick-headed mopes like you is that I know that their hearts are in the right place. Their heads need to catch up.
The people who use the police for things you don't like understand what the police are. They understand the things I'm talking about, which is why the police work for them. The Constitution is only as good as its current interpretation, and your interpretation is meaningless unless you find a way to give it some weight.
Police should properly be thought of as tools and weapons. Being sad that a weapon doesn't spontaneously shoot its wielder is absurd. What matters is taking the action necessary to wield the weapon.
You don't understand any of the political or legal realities. And you really don't want cops thinking they have the authority to enforce or not enforce laws by fiat.
It may comfort you to know that lots of cops won't touch some of the laws and orders you don't like. But it shouldn't. Wanna know why? Because the political machinery will replace them all with time. We are always going to be outmaneuvered if we fail to learn how things work and take control instead of getting boo-boo lip because things should somehow be different.
Go learn something.
His chin needs liposuction.
You clearly need this: The Easter Bunny isn't real, either.
Now maybe you can stop being butthurt because predictable things happen predictably.
I retired out as a cop. It took me months to work through the adrenaline when everyone started wearing masks into businesses. 😄
Okay, now you're getting closer to a workable model. The problem is that you're acting like you just discovered that Santa isn't real. The more dangerous thoughtless faggots are the ones who think the police wuv them and are there to pwotect them. Sowwy, but welcome to adulthood.
Now decide if you're going to bitch about the police or go after the hand holding the leash.
You seem to think that cops are something very different from what they actually are. They're not a standing army to protect the people. They're the enforcement arm of local government. The constitutionality of their actions is determined way above their pay grade.
The Glock/taser confusion is likely a result of training. Cops are trained to draw their pistols under stress, but taser training is always going to be more sparse.
When I was issued a taser years ago, I did my own studying. I already knew that cops were drawing their pistols when they were thinking taser out of neuro memory. Nobody cares when a cop screws up and kills a white guy, so the stories don't get wide coverage.
Anyway, I trained myself to use my taser with my off hand. Taser left, pistol right. The individual cop has to figure out how to train himself to get the right weapon out, and the department needs to provide the time and materials to anchor in the right response.
But some executive dictates are covered by the Constitution. Governors are the top of the executive branch in their states, and their powers expand under a "state of emergency". If the legislature and judiciary don't countermand a governor, those dictates are presumed constitutional.
There is no legal mechanism for the lowest rung of the executive branch (cops) to start deciding which laws or executive orders make sense. That elevated beat cops to the level of a supreme court, along with some firepower to enforce their decisions.
The cops are never going to suddenly become our saviors. It's not because they're bad, good, or indifferent--it's the way the whole thing is built. Cops aren't even mentioned in the Constitution. We need to control the apparatus that directs the cops. Good mayors, good governors, good judges, and good legislatures make for good enforcement.
In the animal trials (before we gave manufacturers a worldwide human test group), there were some extreme adverse effects, including a paradoxical hypersensitivity to the bug being fought, and a number of autoimmune reactions.
Even without concerns that some dark agenda is being advanced, this is new biotech that's never been brought to market, and we're testing it on healthy people for a bug that can only kill a sliver of the population that's already being killed by something.
I couldn't find anything specific to CVST about heparin. Heparin is dangerous, but most of the danger is mitigated if we're paying attention. Lovenox is safer, but it can't do everything.
I'm wondering what this guy means about heparin being dangerous in this case. It seems that danger is relative to politics these days.
Good ol' heparin is dangerous, and it's only administered via continuous IV. It needs to be monitored and titrated constantly. It also has an extremely dangerous potential side effect that has to be caught immediately.
Lovenox and its cousins are a quick subcutaneous shot without anything near the risk of heparin.
They don't actually thin the blood. They affect platelets (aspirin and Plavix) or clotting factors (warfarin and heparin). It doesn't affect blood volume or viscosity.
They may not be stupid, but they're lazy and scared.
This is a genius way to get and keep trannies out of Texas.
When the Texas Coalition comes to invade my state, I know which side I'll be fighting for.
When a law is passed by elected legislators and supported by duly appointed or elected judges, how are the cops supposed to decide which ones are fake?
Wait--a show about slavery in America? Why hasn't someone thought of this before?
Yeah. It's a choice of evils, but I'd prefer to take the more conventional versions of vaccine. I'll take the known risks.
Okay, but why did they use a picture of Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson?
It was only one time because PETA found out what you were doing and grocery stores stopped selling you Jell-O. The good news is that Snopes is giving the story a "mostly false" until they can find out if you voted for Biden.
I'd still take the J&J instead of the mRNA treatments if I had to choose.
Fair enough, but they're very sharp on infection control.
Smaller, weaker cops can justify a higher level of force earlier in an encounter. A female cop can and will shoot you before a make cop would.
Wanna know how to reduce the incidence of "police brutality", though? Pass laws saying that cops are justified in immediate and serious force escalation when a suspect takes any action to resist arrest. People don't screw around much if they sure they got a skull fracture coming when they pull away from an arrest (I don't actually want that kind of society, by the way, but the Care Bear approach emboldens dirtbags to run and fight.)
You're also known for that one thing with the penguins and the 42 gallons of raspberry Jell-O, but I won't bring that up here.
It wasn't for you. It was for people who can understand and actually make a difference. Enjoy being part of the problem.