It seems she has the perfect understanding of what they wanted in this case.
The want people to go through the motions and get the same count as last time so the media can point to yet another audit finding nothing wrong and coming up with the same count as before.
"But we have taken a second look! Can't you see - they just did an audit!"
I mean, have you read Trump's fundraising emails about the election fraud?
They stopped saying anything about attempting to change the result a long time ago. Now it's all cleverly worded "next time" shit.
And you have to donate a pretty ridiculous amount of money to even have it go to the save our elections fund. The first large chunk gets divided up between Trump, The RNC and some other PAC (I assume Georgia runoff)
I mean, you've got to admit that it's at least noteworthy that Trump had better support amongst Arabs than Jews.
Kinda weird since he was the first President to actually follow up on his promise to move the US embassy, actually got some mideast peace deals going and sent plenty of our tax dollars to our "greatest ally".
I know I was certainly fucking surprised by that.
Are you really unaware of the type of data these social media apps collect from smartphones even when the app is not in use?
Sorry, but my computer doesn't know where I work, or what route I took home. Or where I ate lunch. Facebook knows all that about me and more and I've never even had an account.
Right. Because having control over pretty much the entire news and entertainment industries doesn't allow anyone to exert any influence on public opinion at all.
If Biden is allowed to take office it's going to be like the early 90s all over again.
Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidians show that the government absolutely will react with violence with the right (wrong) leadership. And it's once again gonna snowball into something like Oklahoma City.
But we aren't going to see any insurrection. Because if we did, Biden wouldn't hesitate to invoke the act and crush it.
What was the Senate balance of power then?
I assume this has more to do with it being so close to 50/50 now (especially given how many of the Rs are actually Ds) that if there were some type of emergency session (election related or otherwise), her vote would be very important to their side.
One thing is for certain - it's not because she thinks they aren't going to be in the White House in 5 weeks.
Damnit the cached version updated. Sorry, I didn't know it did that. Should have used an archiver. I just saved the link someone else sent me.
At any rate, the pdf is available on that page.
Sure thing:
Here's the link to the current page where they say they took it down because people were using it to support "inaccuracies" (lol, in other words "the research didn't say what we wanted and the wrong people found it")
https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19
I think they do include a link to a pdf on that page, but just in case here's the google cached version from before they took it down. It was a pretty eye opening read to learn that NO age groups experienced a spike in deaths this year. That seems vurrry significant to me, but what do I know?
I like the suppressed study that showed overall deaths weren't up in 2020 in ANY age group.
The researchers were surprised at that one because they were expecting there to at least be a spike amongst old people.
So it really seems like this thing is only killing off people who had a few months to live anyway. Sounds like a good reason to shut everything down, give the government more power and ignore the constitution when government officials decide it doesn't apply to them.
Fuck that "dead name" shit. We already have a word for it.
It's "legal name".
One of those experts is "conservative" lawyer George Conway, who just spent many millions of dollars to elect left-wing candidates in many races across the country.
George Conway says that Trump's case has no merit. So apparently he can't read because at the very least the PA one is an absolute slam dunk because the mail in voting as administered was plainly unconstitutional.
Someone hasn't been paying attention. That's literally why the case was tossed from the PA Supreme Court.
That's fine and dandy.
But if a case that has been litigated for weeks through the courts was filed too late, how can a case that was filed less than 24 hrs ago not also be too late?
I feel like this is just a preview of the eventual fence sitting ruling. They're going to eventually say that it was unconstitutional to set the precedent that this can't happen again, but they're also going to say something about how absent clear evidence of widespread fraud due to the unconstitutional decision they aren't going to overturn votes of people doing what their legislature told them.
That's going to be the next fraud if they are ordered to get rid of those ballots.
It's going to be "oh wow all these mail in votes that were illegal were Trump! The Biden late night spike wasn't mail in votes it was election day votes that weren't counted earlier due to a clerical error"
Oh, well because you say it's because he's a commnist I guess I don't need to see any affidavits.
Yeah it was painful because if she had stopped before sounding like a person off her meds she could have been a good witness.. but when she started accusing the guy at the hearing of being in on it with the "maybe you guys were doing funny stuff with the pollbooks" or whatever, she lost me and I was embarrassed. Rudy obviously felt the same thing because he kept trying to stop her.
And of course, that's literally the only bit of any of these hearings I've seen on the media. They are all too happy to show crazy lady but won't show the real evidence or the stats people making excellent points.
Got a link to their affidavits? Because they certianly weren't included in the lawsuit and that's why the judge was able to say that no one backed her up.
Really? So when Rudy reacted to her sounding crazy by trying to ger her to shut up, he wasn't helpful to our side?
I'd love to hear more about this theory that Rudy Giuliani is a plant trying to hurt Trump.
I heard he got cancer or some shit. Legitimately. And I guess it started affecting him badly so he didn't feel up to streaming anymore or as much.
I wish she had listened to Rudy when he was trying to shut her up. She came off as insane.
I think her testimony was a caricature in itself.
This clip of course cut out all those parts, but she came off looking like a crazy person off her meds.
The fact that no one else who was there, even republican observers back up her claims is also questionable.
I feel like she's a plant to discredit us. Rudy was clearly trying to get her to shut the fuck up at one point but she wasn't listening.
Is that Mr Metokur?
Was this the one where they found a couple of Trump votes switched to Biden in something like 100 ballots that were supposed to have been duplicated?
I remember seeing a video from the Arizona GOP saying something like that.
That's a ridiculously small sample size and they should WANT to compare more to see if it was an anomaly or if that percentage holds up across the board. That they aren't even looking is just disgusting.