2
StrangerThanFiction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lin Wood just said he will send the GA case up to the 11th on an emergency level if he has to. Also he just said he freed Kenosha Kyle!!!

1
StrangerThanFiction 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice how they typed thedonald(.)win instead of thedonaldonald.win, so that normies wouldn't be able to link to this site?

2
StrangerThanFiction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's the entire CNN shitfest full of deboooonking and dispuuuutes: https://archive.is/IYUbI

Edit: after reading some of the rest of it, pay close attention to what they leave out.

The first section leaves out that they rescinded only after they were threatened, bullied, and promised a full audit, which was a lie.

The second section leaves out that Rudy also said there was literally more votes than people in some precincts. Not registered voters. People. Including children.

2
StrangerThanFiction 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't watch/listen right now. Any pede wanna summarize the happening?

6
StrangerThanFiction 6 points ago +6 / -0

It doesn't even make sense as a typo. They didn't just leave off a zero or something. It's way off.

182
StrangerThanFiction 182 points ago +182 / -0

None of it makes sense. Why was there even a zoom call in the first place? Listening to leftists screech shouldn't be part of the process of certifying results of an election.

12
StrangerThanFiction 12 points ago +12 / -0

They only look at certain types of irregularities, specifically making sure the number of votes match up to the poll books. So apparently that specific discrepancy was an issue in Detroit. I get what you are saying though. They shouldn't have even given an inch.

2
StrangerThanFiction 2 points ago +2 / -0

It just seems like all the checks and balances are being ignored and the Republic is teetering on the edge. SCOTUS better hold the line.

2
StrangerThanFiction 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm trying to understand why they would certify results that have discrepancies. Isn't their entire job to make sure there is no discrepancies?

According to WAPO: https://archive.is/PQ3T6

Democratic board members Jonathan Kinloch and Allen Wilson votes “emphatically” in favor of certifying the results, with Republican members Monica Palmer and William Hartmann voting against the motion to certify. Kinloch said there was “no reason under the sun” not to certify and called the actions “reckless and irresponsible.” Palmer said that her reason for voting no was based on problems she has seen, saying “I believe we do not have complete and accurate information in those poll books.”

Then later in the article:

Before they certify the results, the boards spend two weeks reviewing poll books and vote totals and resolving any discrepancies that need to be corrected. The main task: to check whether the number of votes reported by the voting machines in each precinct match the number of voters recorded in poll books. “We’re not here to talk about the van full of ballots that showed up at 3 a.m. or whatever people are alleging happened. That’s not why we’re here. We’re here to look at those poll books,” said Michelle Voorheis, a Republican member of the Genesee County Board of Canvassers.

So how can they then decide to certify and audit after the fact? Does anyone know if this is legal?

5
StrangerThanFiction 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's true, I was watching it too.

1
StrangerThanFiction 1 point ago +1 / -0

A "comprehensive audit" of precincts with unexplained out-of-balance tallies. So ridiculous. I found this out while searching for the 3rd GA county to find votes that Kayleigh McEnany was talking about on Hannity. (I know, force of habit. He usually puts me to sleep). Still searching for a link or video on that, but meanwhile this abrupt certification is sketchy.

25
StrangerThanFiction 25 points ago +25 / -0

Wasn't it also Michigan that instantly showed 138k Biden votes and zero Trump votes?

5
StrangerThanFiction 5 points ago +5 / -0

The other headlines are bullshit too.

Claims of election fraud in key states "deserve to be heard"? They do deserve to be heard, so why is that in quotes?

Wasn't the PA court already btfo by the federal court regarding those absentee ballots? Funny how faux news doesn't mention that.

5
StrangerThanFiction 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Thousands of Trump supporters"? More like hundreds of thousands. "Falsely claim election fraud"? How do they know the claims are false? Have any of the hundreds of current claims been investigated? Fake news gonna fake

16
StrangerThanFiction 16 points ago +16 / -0

"It's one huge criminal conspiracy that should be investigated by military intelligence for national security implications", I believe is what she said. Also, Dominion claims "there were no glitches" and "the results are 100% auditable". Well let's audit them then. She even mentioned that the website links in the letter the dems wrote previously, complaining about the problems with Dominion, have all been scrubbed off the internet. Oh please let them have real rico level proof to catch up Goolag's assets under that executive order. That would be the icing on the cake.

3
StrangerThanFiction 3 points ago +3 / -0

THIS! I was trying to get this point across, but this is perfectly phrased. Thank you Jim Jordan.

Also, it shouldn't be up to just Democrats. More Republicans need to push for this...the damn DHS and DOJ should be actively investigating already. People made shocking allegations under oath. Why does no one seem interested in finding out the truth? Either it's true and Trump likely won, or it's false and people should be held accountable for perjury.

11
StrangerThanFiction 11 points ago +11 / -0

True. My point is, enough is enough. We need a full blown investigation, recount, audit, and then some. Right now. If they could investigate collusion for years and go through a shampeachment then they can investigate election/voter fraud too. There's more than enough to warrant it, what are they so afraid of? If they did nothing wrong they shouldn't mind being investigated. That's what they told us for years.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›