1
Strill 1 point ago +1 / -0

The states have the constitutional power to conduct elections. The supreme court isn't going to infringe on that. They will make their decisions according to the state election law.

0
Strill 0 points ago +1 / -1

The state courts don't matter. These cases are gonna get appealed up to the supreme court. That's where they'll be decided.

3
Strill 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine you're looking at the first digit of numbers 1 through 20. 50% of the numbers start with one.

Now imagine you're looking at the first digit of numbers from 1 to 50. 20% of them will start with one.

Now imagine you're looking at the first digit of numbers from 1 to 99. 10% of them will start with one.

So we have a trend here. In most situations, the number one is a more common first digit than other numbers. Only in very specific situations is it equally likely as other numbers.

Now imagine that you're looking at the first digit of numbers from 1 to 200. It's back up to 50% of those numbers starting with one. So you can say that the odds of a number starting with one varies between 10% and 50%, depending on the range of numbers you're looking at.

There's more to it than that, but that should at least give you an idea of the basic concept.

18
Strill 18 points ago +19 / -1

There are no do-overs in presidential elections. The constitution doesn't allow for it. The 12th amendment says that if there's no majority by the deadline, then the state house of representatives vote for the president, and that is majority Republican, meaning Trump wins.

1
Strill 1 point ago +1 / -0

He says that 100k votes came in for Biden, and were otherwise blank. Where's the evidence for that?

1
Strill 1 point ago +1 / -0

He mentions that 100k votes came in for Biden, and no other candidate. Is there any evidence of that?