Well that is probably the easiest version of a glowie to spot.

You don't seem to understand that those left wing tactics are nothing but stage magic. They don't work by design, if you don't have the full cooperation of whatever authorities are relevant.

Yea, this is a new EO, but was there not one signed a while ago that stated the incoming president must not have financial ties to foreign governments (or something like that)? Might have been 2016?

2018 iirc

There are absolutely threats. A lot of these gangs take orders from people higher up.

And, finally, they allow the Secretary of Defense publicly to list whether a company is a Communist Chinese military company

Good news then. It does expose them.

Edit: Hold on. What was that EO about people with ties to China being unable to take office in the US?

That's why this statement was put out, to hamstring their attempts to incite such violence.

They lack the one and only thing that actually matters at the end of it all in this world.

It's not just about inserting diverse characters though, it's also about asserting that existing characters have no deeper value than a collection of random variables.

Do you know what I see?

I see that the left is fighting tooth and nail to get Trump out of office now.

What possible motive would they have for these actions if Trump had already lost?

Godspeed patriots.

Oh look, more

Totally real evidence guys! Believe me! No I won't show it to you.

I'm not American, so it'll have to be Dem.

A certain amount of that always has to do with when they were posted, and how far down the comment chain it is. You should also note that I didn't really provide any hard evidence of what I'm saying.

Basically, don't read too much into how many Internet points something gets. There are lots of potential reasons other than whatever you're reading into it.

That's an entirely different issue from

yup sodomy is legal as long as you are LGBT and within ten years you can sleep with a minor. 22 year old can sleep with a 12 year old now and not be prosecuted.

Which is outright false.

It's been a while since I looked into it when it was popular, but most of the reporting I saw was playing fast and loose with language to strongly imply things that weren't true. Some just lied outright.

iirc: It only relates to how sentencing is determined, and doesn't do anything to change the actual legality of any given acts. Previously judges were allowed to use their discretion only in cases that involved vaginal intercourse, but this new bill allows a judge to use the same discretion in cases involving anal intercourse as well.

It's a really stupid bit of misinfo that got spread around. The specifics are a bit complicated, but the bill everyone is up in arms about was only fixing an existing discrepancy between how the law treated vaginal vs anal sex.

Do they not know what “shall not be infringed” means?

Oh, OH! I know this one!

It means that if you can figure out how to infringe upon it then the entire document is rendered moot, right?

it's morally wrong

Strong disagree. What he is alleging is as exceptional as circumstances can possibly get. Making these allegations without providing receipts is what is morally wrong.

Also, if you honestly believe that the military would fight with the people today, but those same soldiers would fight against the people because the date rolled over, you've got an infantile perspective on the world.

Yup. He appears to be asking people to take some extremely serious action, based entirely upon his word that proof definitely exists.

No. If he actually has solid evidence that he believes necessitates armed insurrection, then it is his duty as a patriot to release that evidence.

Anything less at this point and I'll start treating him as an agent provocateur.

Do Europeans miss being serfs?

They really seem too. They keep trying this shit every generation or two.

You gonna be all right champ?

You sound a little bit on edge.

They also want to distract you from the real battles with petty agitations.

There is literally a video of Biden admitting to pressuring Ukraine to fire a prosecutor in exchange for foreign aid.

Nothing means anything politically if you don't have the hard power to enforce your views.