2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't discount the number of shills here also. Not every doomer is being honest about who they are. Anyone who was here right after the decision saw how damn fast those threads were filled up with doom and gloom. It was definitely not organic.

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

As things stand right now, Trump is still fighting the legal battle. Unless you've decided that you don't trust him, I would suggest you wait and don't do anything stupid that could jeopardize his fight there.

0
Sumsuch 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's quite prideful of you to assert that your conclusion there is certain. Are you proud enough of that conclusion that you will stake your life upon it, if that were demanded?

I get that I'm sounding rhetorical here, but it's an honest question that you ought to consider if you're intending to build your perspective upon such a conclusion.

0
Sumsuch 0 points ago +3 / -3

I know enough retired officers and even generals who can and are willing to lead the fight.

So why don't you go talk to them instead of trying to convince anons online to flip their shit?

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You want to talk about the WHOLE of reality?

The Allmighty God, who stands above absolutely everything else, loves us unconditionally.

Our individual lives may suck, sometimes for a long time, but at the end of everything his love for us is unwavering.

2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Focus on the signal.

Ignore the noise.

Random retards posting anonymously online might not even be real people. That's noise.

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Now go tell that to the many people actually, explicitly, suggesting that throughout this thread.

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you suggesting that you would be willing to kill over this if you got a confirmation? If we do have to go to war, that's one thing, but flying off the handle and shooting people over this is just stupid and counterproductive. At the least wait and see what Trump's response will be.

3
Sumsuch 3 points ago +3 / -0

We kill now

Is the second comment in this thread.

4
Sumsuch 4 points ago +17 / -13

For real, the shilling is going into overdrive in this thread trying to convince people to start shooting randoms. Even saw one comment near the top trying to convince people to kill their own family.

-9
Sumsuch -9 points ago +21 / -30

Who said there will be no consequences? There are still more legal avenues open. Did you just totally forget about all the evidence of fraud that this case didn't even attempt to address?

Besides, are you going to let an anonymous internet comment make such a serious decision for you?

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Calm down everyone. It's completely normal for the FBI to go to a murder victim's home and confiscate their laptops without even investigating the murder.

6
Sumsuch 6 points ago +6 / -0

They are attempting to instigate political violence that can disrupt the orderly processes that are ongoing, because they know that they can't win if these cases are allowed to proceed.

15
Sumsuch 15 points ago +15 / -0

You should realize that the dicks you're thinking about are the very people that we're opposing in this culture war. They've weaponized their mass media to sell you the idea that we are your enemy, because we are just as pissed off as you are at what they have been doing while waving our flags. They would love for us to fight, seeing each other only through the lens of overly broad groups, rather than turning our attention towards the specific individuals who are personally responsible.

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a scientist I feel obligated to point out that, if you take what they claim about the vaccine at face value, these are not mutually exclusive options. Similar to the whole mask + distancing thing, when you apply both together they work in tandem to produce a better result than either one alone does. There are much stronger arguments that you can make, like the fact that the disease isn't even particularly dangerous anyways, as this one is fairly easy to legitimately refute.

2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

If SCOTUS applies a strict interpretation of the constitution

Translation: If SCOTUS follows the law

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's really come into his own after losing to Trump in the primary. Cruz is quite possibly the best example of a republican who has truly learned how to win from GEotUS.

-14
Sumsuch -14 points ago +2 / -16

So point out the double standard directly instead of trying to be coy by pretending to go along with it.

It's like the okay hand gesture. Do you think 4chan actually tricked anyone? Hell no, they were just happy for any excuse to paint something else ordinary as an alarming symbol of evil for their followers.

-11
Sumsuch -11 points ago +2 / -13

You're imitating their behavior by pretending that certain phrases are magically more powerful than others regardless of context, which is what they need you to accept before they can start eliminating problematic phrases from our language.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›