3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

In fairness, the breathtaking scale of our slide into full Clown World was and is now hard to fathom.

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Underappreciated comment. Yes indeed re: the money and power at stake, and Kline's role, and the oligarches' execution.

-1
SurfingUSA -1 points ago +1 / -2

Your loss. You asked a question. The series has the answer.

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think you are both correct, Bannon kept Trump strong against the D.C. cabal pressure.

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

? Pede is answering a question, not fluffing, IMO

8
SurfingUSA 8 points ago +8 / -0

BORIS ON POINT -- the loss of the Louisiana senator in the Peach Mint vote -- lucky it wasn't more -- due to the ineptness of Trump legal team.

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Another thing is that it is a show of IDEAS, he has a LOT of authors on who are amazingly aware about the larger picture --

The author of Thirty Tyrants -- https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-thirty-tyrants

The guy who wrote how completely uninvested Hollywood virtue signallers are: https://www.conservativereview.com/prominent-professor-takes-down-virtue-signaling-seth-rogen-gets-canceled-hard-2650399492.html

Sometimes I'm amazed at how much of an intellectual salon the show is.

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

My take without doing any research on this point is that he is, as usual, full of [email protected]

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think he was a bit quiet and only rarely pulled his own weight, and I say that as a fan of Maxey. Posobiec etc. are a ton livelier.

10
SurfingUSA 10 points ago +10 / -0

WHOA this FBI guy arrested is the expose of the year ...

So the same FBI that shredded Georgia's ballots HELPED ORGANIZE the Capitol "riot" ????

Dang .... dang ....

-1
SurfingUSA -1 points ago +1 / -2

Read the Deep Capture series on the election steal by Patrick Byrne, and have a sick bag nearby while you do. https://www.deepcapture.com/

Basically Rudy drank his way through the legal attack on the election and fiddled with his phone whenever Patrick and his quants presented their damning evidence of the numbers/machine fraud. AND quashed the quants' pleadings in person with DJT, who was unfortunately loyal to the counterproductive "mayor."

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

even BORIS has turned around!! Honestly now that he is broadcasting with his real face and about the Peach Mint, he's suddenly not full of hot air and MUCH more valuable.

Someone prolly Raheem got him straightened out after the withering criticism on this site and live chat.

2
SurfingUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I saw the video as well, an officer threw his hands or upper body off the balcony, and he seemed to fall a fatal distance but impossible to actually see how he landed based on the video angle upwards.

9
SurfingUSA 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yep, there WAS a thrown fire extinguisher (as your video shows) but Sicknick was not part of the entanglement.

16
SurfingUSA 16 points ago +16 / -0

On balance, acknowledging that Bannon was wrong about Trump continuing in office, he's still essential viewing because otherwise NO ONE is providing pertinent details of what is going in Wyoming with Cheney, in Maricopa County with the subpoenas, in the Peach Mint with the struggling legal defense, etc.

He was wrong about Trump staying in office probably to keep morale up, or to keep his OWN sanity.

I really think for all his towering faults, Bannon is way better than any other news source anywhere, with stellar guests lists (barring Giuliani) based on whoever is really breaking news. I'd say when he's on form, he's the modern-day Cronkite + Huntley Brinkley, and if our nation was not fully compromised from within, he's be on the biggest network in prime time.

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

His Twitter bio says "former co-host," so apparently yes.

1
SurfingUSA 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are completely daft. China is making huge inroads in the Caribbean and Canada and Latin America via its investments. You have the most naive view of how international relations really work I have ever read on a comment board. Are you a hippie in Taos, or what exactly.

2
SurfingUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

From Unrestricted Warfare:

At the time of the emergence of the early nation states, the births of most of them were assisted by blood-and-iron warfare. In the same way, during the transition of nation states to globalization, there is no way to avoid collisions between enormous interest blocs. What is different is that the means that we have today to untie the "Gordian Knot" [3] are not merely swords, and because of this we no longer have to be like our ancestors who invariably saw resolution by armed force as the last court of appeals.

Any of the political, economic, or diplomatic means now has sufficient strength to supplant military means. However, mankind has no reason at all to be gratified by this, because what we have done is nothing more than substitute bloodless warfare for bloody warfare as much as possible. [4] As a result, while constricting the battlespace in the narrow sense, at the same time we have turned the entire world into a battlefield in the broad sense. On this battlefield, people still fight, plunder, and kill each other as before, but the weapons are more advanced and the means more sophisticated, so while it is somewhat less bloody, it is still just as brutal. Given this reality, mankind's dream of peace is still as elusive as ever.

Even speaking optimistically, war will not be wiped out rapidly within the foreseeable future, whether it is bloody or not. Since things which should happen will ultimately come to pass, what we can and must focus on at present is how to achieve victory.

Faced with warfare in the broad sense that will unfold on a borderless battlefield, it is no longer possible to rely on military forces and weapons alone to achieve national security in the larger strategic sense, nor is it possible to protect these stratified national interests.

Obviously, warfare is in the process of transcending the domains of soldiers, military units, and military affairs, and is increasingly becoming a matter for politicians, scientists, and even bankers.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›