2
SurlyBastage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why has no one (whomever might have the power) determined 1. WHO, exactly, in each counting place gave the fucking STOP ORDER. 2. HOW did all them get their message to stop? Cell phone call? text? email? Personal visit by some messenger? an alert from the Dominion machine or system? HOW? Can someone who can be heard, PLEASE DEMAND THESE ANSWERS?

1
SurlyBastage 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the WI hearing, live, a bit ago today, the legislators state that since they had ceded their election control to so0me commission, years ago, that "Our hands are tied by our own actions"

5
SurlyBastage 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mr martin says that the workers just "weren't trained" to let people know when they resumed counting.

1
SurlyBastage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone please answer a related question? First, I’m so damned proud of my home state (Native Texan, hell yeah!) but what I can’t find anywhere: are Rudy and Sidney DONE? Do they have ANY current suits? If not, does that mean that if not for Ken Paxton, it was all over, or is there something else in the works? Thank God for Paxton, May God bless his massive jewels.

3
SurlyBastage 3 points ago +4 / -1

Can someone get me up to speed, here? The Texas case is our Last Best Hope? OR are there still Rudy or Sidney cases filed that are out there? I get the impression that we're down to only the Texas case (God bless Texas) but there MUST BE MORE....right?

40
SurlyBastage 40 points ago +40 / -0 (edited)

The most troubling bit in this judge's rejection speech was "you are asking me to ignore the two-and-a-half million Georgia voters who voted for Biden", so even in his summary, he is portraying the vote numbers as accurate AND is revealing that he does not 'get' the magnitude of the fraud that has been perpetrated. The sweet spot of this fraud scheme is that they made it so huge... that its very dimension provides the disbelief to stop the question. We are left with having to say that the reason we are in this court is because the scheme is SO MASSIVE; to which the court replies "well THAT massive would just be impossible so, no, you can't look.".

1
SurlyBastage 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

actually, logic would suggest that we KNOW they were mail-in, so we'll apportion them with the same ration as all mail-ins (Biden/Trump 85-15) so if there are 100,000 120-year-olds, we'll throw out 85K Bidens and 15K Trumps.

7
SurlyBastage 7 points ago +7 / -0

Start by simply nullifying adding up voter records marked as 120 year olds. throw that many mail-in votes out.

2
SurlyBastage 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why NO ONE would tell us how MANY total ballots were to be counted. They STILL won't tell us what the 'universe of ballots' is in many places.

1
SurlyBastage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope that it's proof and explanation of a point not yet well stated; specifically: that the REASON for all the hoopla over (and the warning that there would be so many) mail-in votes is that they are the MECHANISM for colluding with the Dominion machines. The dominion system responds to the unexpected Trump numbers by flipping votes in the tally, but in order for this to be covered up, (in case of a recount) there must now be X number of new Biden ballots CREATED and added to the aggregate. As the night wore on, the Dominion system did the math on the fly/ created votes/ destroyed votes and ALSO communicated to the handlers that X ballots needed to be created and the Mail-ins at 4AM were the way to make it happen. Please let veritas expose this!

13
SurlyBastage 13 points ago +13 / -0

The White Hat Whacker is here to Cut dominion down to size!!!

view more: Next ›