Might be a problem of what units we're using, typical measure of po2 is 10-20 measured in kpa (killopasscales), as a perfusionist in the UK we don't see any abg measure of 98 except maybe Hb (if someone is using a a unit scale). So when referring to Oxygen the only measure that makes sense to me is saturation (which ABG machines do measure), importantly they can't use pulse oxymetry because...well he had no pulse and the spectrometer wouldn't register ( pulse oximetry is useless during CPB as circulation is laminar, not pulsatile).

TLDR, unless the USA uses Killodaltons or some other pressure unit, the only thing that makes sense is for the doctor to be talking about Saturayion of haemoglobin. (Doesn't rule out suffocation, can easily saturate a dead body using 100% bvm + chest compressions)

Im gonna get lots of shit here but it's possible to fully saturate (98% oxygen) a dead person with good mechanical ventilation via a " bag and mask" and chest compressions. I've seen it done. Given that this is standard procedure for ambulance staff, it doesn't mean Floyed wasn't suffocated. Sorry, no hate please.

I'm gonna get lots of shit here but it's possible to fully saturate (98% oxygen) a dead person with good mechanical ventilation via a " bag and mask" and chest compressions. I've seen it done. Given that this is standard procedure for ambulance staff, it doesn't mean Floyed wasn't suffocated. Sorry, no hate please.

The document linked in this article quotes a CDC document. However the quote upon which the claim is based does not appear. It has been removed or never existed (page 39 is claimed to state no identifiable virus issolated, it does not)

SNP are the worst cuts.

Knife party. CSTT 2015 vets

That was no punch. That guy 100% had a heavy metal bar in his fist.

Now imagine there are 1000 people in the precinct. 800 registered Republicans registered. Shiva assumes these 800 vote RSP (the 0% line), Trump only receives 600 votes . Trump is at -25% in an 80% Republican precinct. They used real numbers dude.

OK I've had a third watch and I think I'm seeing the problem. You argue that in a precinct with just 1% Republican population (say 10 people from 1000), TIC (trump votes) can't be less than -1% but a 10% decrease in support for Trump in that precinct (1 person just voting RSP not Trump) would show as a -10%, remember they are using vote tallies to calculate the % not just inferring. So in the precinct that is 1% Republican trump gets 9 votes from an estimated 10 based on % Republican population, Shiva then assumes this 10 (1% as population) would vote RSP and subtracts it from Trumps actual vote tally to get -10%. The problems come in at 0% & 100% at 0% Trump can't go -ve and at 100% Trump can't go +ve so it appears the criticism is valid. Conversely the criticism argues that in a 50/50 precinct (say population of 1000, 500 assumed to be RSP) the spread has to be -50% - +50%, however if Trump somehow received 900 votes then the plot would show Trump at +80% of RSP.

I think in trying to make the graph easy to read he has opened up doors for valid criticism.

OK I've had a third watch and I think I'm seeing the problem. You argue that in a precinct with just 1% Republican population (say 100people), TIC (trump votes) can't be less than -1% but a 10% decrease in support for Trump in that precinct (10 people just voting RSP not Trump) would show as a -10%, remember they are using vote tallies to calculate the % not just inferring. So in the precinct that is 1% Republican trump gets 90 votes from an estimated 100 based on % Republican population, Shiva then assumes this 100 (1% as population) would vote RSP and subtracts it from Trumps actual vote tally to get -10%.

It depends on how he is linking the axis I think, I believe his is implying a straight line of 0% along the y axis would represent the 100% of the %Republican on the x axis also voting Trump. If 10% of the Republican % population (x axis) chose not to vote Trump then it would show as a straight line in the negative at -10%. The criticism comes in because he does a poor job of explaining that the main x axis is not the one linked to the Y. User Supercharger argues that if there are only 1% republicans in a precinct then trumps % can't be less that -1%... however I believe Shiva is arguing that Trump lost 10% of that 1% and that's what his graph is showing.

Since edited.

Of course the y axis can exceed 0% at 100% RSP, independent and democrat voters voting trump would push it into the +ve. You are correct that at 0% RSP means the TIC can't be less than 0% but that doesn't matter because it would just mean Trump got 0 votes in 100% Democrat precincts.

Edit; just rewatched the relevant parts, if a precinct is 100% Republican and they all vote RSP then TIC can't be 0< you are correct on both points. But, in true deep Republican territory Trump got less % RSP votes than some 50/50 precinct?

Ty, found on YT too

Any link not from twatter that I can send to my normal mates?

Despite massive increase in mail in ballots.....

Old school C.S.T.T vids on YT from 2015 primaries then onto T_D then here.

At all times willing to be reasonable......unti he was forced to be unreasonable. RIP Killdozer.

Channel 5 is the ginger stepchild of UK television, id be shocked if they get over 100,000 views for anything they produce.

TFW you're soon to become cum filled currency for both black and white prisoners and your dream of being the catalyst for racial equality becomes reality

Isn't this the wrong guy? Other posts say a guy named Kyle.

Twitter is packed with "trump is loosing it" "he's gone mad" chatter over the past week or so....Guess this is why.

Its uncanny.

""Ladies"" you say?

Oh my sweet summer child...