4
Swaraj_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

okay retard

Title 48, § 301(31a, b, c), Code of Alabama of 1940, as amended, which provide:

"§ 301(31a). Separate accommodations for white and colored races.—All passenger stations in this state operated by any motor transportation company shall have separate waiting rooms or space and separate ticket windows for the white and colored races, but such accommodations for the races shall be equal. All motor transportation companies or operators of vehicles carrying passengers for hire in this state, whether intrastate or interstate passengers, shall at all times provide equal but separate accommodations on each vehicle for the white and colored races. The conductor or agent of the motor transportation company in charge of any vehicle is authorized and required to assign each passenger to the division of the vehicle designated for the race to which the passenger belongs; and, if the passenger refuses to occupy the division to which he is assigned, the conductor or agent may refuse to carry the passenger on the vehicle; and, for such refusal, neither the conductor or agent of the motor transportation company nor the motor transportation company shall be liable in damages. Any motor transportation company or person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars for each offense; and each day's violation of this section shall constitute a separate offense.

Section 10, Chapter 6, Code of the City of Montgomery, 1952, which provides:

"Every person operating a bus line in the city shall provide equal but separate accommodations for white people and negroes on his buses, by requiring the employees in charge thereof to assign passengers seats on the vehicles under their charge in such manner as to separate the white people from the negroes, where there are both white and negroes on the same car; provided, however, that negro nurses having in charge white children or sick or infirm white persons, may be assigned seats among white people.

"Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the operators of such bus lines from separating the races by means of separate vehicles if they see fit."

Section 11 of Chapter 6, Montgomery City Code of 1952, further provides:

"Any employee in charge of a bus operated in the city shall have the powers of a police officer of the city while in actual charge of any bus, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the preceding section, and it shall be unlawful for any passenger to refuse or fail to take a seat among those assigned to the race to which he belongs, at the request of any such employee in charge, if there is such a seat vacant."

The members of the Board of Commissioners and the Chief of Police of the City of Montgomery in their answers to the complaint admit "that they seek to enforce the statutes of the State of Alabama and the ordinances of the City of Montgomery, Alabama", and further aver that "segregation of privately owned buses within cities within the State of Alabama is in accordance with the laws of the State of Alabama and the City of Montgomery."

The Montgomery City Lines, Inc., admits that it has operated, and pursuant to orders of a State Court, continues to operate "its buses as required by the Statutes and Ordinances set out in the Complaint requiring it to provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races". Without dispute the evidence is to the effect that, other than being separate, such accommodations are equal.

The defendants, Blake and Cleere, admit they are employees of the Montgomery City Lines and drivers of its buses, that as such they have acted pursuant to orders of said Company which "has operated its buses on the basis of racial segregation as required by said statutes and ordinances". They deny that as drivers of said buses they are exercising the powers of police officers in the enforcement of said statutes and ordinances.

2
Swaraj_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

It wasn't the bus company's rules, the company was following state and local laws.

6
Swaraj_ 6 points ago +6 / -0

Claudette Colvin was the "original" girl. She was a teenager when she was arrested for refusing to give up her seat, which is why her story started to gain traction. But she also had darker skin and was pregnant while unmarried, and the rumor was that the father was a married man. They staged the Rosa Parks incident because Rosa Parks had lighter skin and a cleaner background, so they gave the press fewer weapons to use against them.

1
Swaraj_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

quite literally the only silver lining of this whole shitshow is that those faqqots will finally fuqq off

1
Swaraj_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah that would really be appreciated, thanks!

2
Swaraj_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I totally get it, I was hesitant to even post the link at first because I pretty much don't ever click Google Docs links, but I figured at the least I could inspire someone else to recreate it on a proper host.

Here's the pastebin, it's a bit messier since the Google Docs thing has everything organized in tables

https://pastebin.com/e8NAjRNQ

2
Swaraj_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I'm looking into that now, I have a backup copy of the Excel file on my computer anyways though.

4
Swaraj_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Toni Morrison called Clinton the first black president. The way she meant it was that the way republicans treated Clinton was like how blacks get treated whites on the street (lol). Hilariously democrats ran with it even further and said Morrison was complimenting Clinton because he was so cool and hip. Whether that was out of pure stupidity or just purely a propaganda effort is difficult to say.

7
Swaraj_ 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've started putting together a document where I can keep track of alternative and independent media sources and I've started sharing it with a few friends. Link is below, what do you guys think?

Also Google Docs seemed to be the easiest way to publish this, if anyone has an alternative let me know, I would gladly switch away from Google

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQrRDR5gXdfZEogWtSRtbhIzX6AYicS9ZcTVfOn55t1ZqRk-KpGxAUdwp0HKySosKMMr4I5568iGkII/pubhtml

3
Swaraj_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

The 6th goes down as one of my top 3 days in all my life, I haven't felt that proud to be an American in quite a while. My only regret is that I didn't attend.

1
Swaraj_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone know where I can the names of these victims? Anytime someone says "George Floyd" I want to be able to counter with names like Ashli Babbitt and Cannon Hinnant.

14
Swaraj_ 14 points ago +15 / -1

Agriculture was run by federal government planning (originally designed to emulate USSR 5 year plans) and they had all sorts of restrictions on who could grow what and how much they could sell it for and who they could sell it to. The new agriculture laws essentially open the markets up for farmers, a lot more freedom to grow and sell based on what they want or what they think the market wants. This places the farming unions, which are essentially run by the Congress Party (a big socialist party in India), out of power. So they basically got a bunch of useful idiots to protest the government catching up to first world agricultural policies.

27
Swaraj_ 27 points ago +27 / -0

India was run by Sanders tier socialists until very recently. There was a period of economic liberalization in the early 90s but the leftists still held onto power until the last decade or so, Modi isn't really that right wing, but it's a good start.

2
Swaraj_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hard times have only just begun.

6
Swaraj_ 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't drink coffee but I'll probably buy a t shirt from these guys. Even if I don't wear it I could always donate it to a charity for those in need. time to start fighting Woke Capitalism and keep right wing businesses alive

view more: Next ›