3
Swedistan 3 points ago +3 / -0

You would think that if they're biological parents they'd be hardwired to never harm their children, but unfortunately that's not the world we live in

I completely disagree with this. The evidence is clear. A non-biological parent in the home is one of the, if not the biggest predictor of child sexual abuse. And two is worse.

7
Swedistan 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it. They always find a way to let them off

0
Swedistan 0 points ago +2 / -2

But it's a great coincidence that it happened to the one in the news isn't it? I mean I'm sure it happens But it is very rare amongst biological parents

-2
Swedistan -2 points ago +6 / -8

I mean.. honestly.. if they had people's names on th cabinets it's almost certain it would fit the name of one of the thousands and thousands of children who have gone missing throughout the years.

Really doubt they be selling children through their main site.

This all seems really unlikely

2
Swedistan 2 points ago +3 / -1

Beans are very healthy for you. Credible theories state that the high bean consumption in Hispanic populations increases the lifespan in these population compared to the expected based on income.

Add beans to all your meals, and specially to meals with meat to mitigate some of the negative health effects of red meat. I put black bean on all burgers at home. Makes little difference to the taste. Great for the digestive system

2
Swedistan 2 points ago +3 / -1

took it as he’s looking at it from our point of view of constantly talking shit about how we have freedom of speech with the first amendment, which we all know is a joke and not true anymore at least in current year

You are wrong. You do have freedom of speech and the first amendment. That's the difference between us.

In Europe we dont. In my country thedonald.win could be declared illegal and would be taken down by police.

You are able to create free alternatives. We are not. Unless we host in the US.

That's one of the reasons I'm here. Our freedom depends on the US staying free.

I do agree on you being in a very bad place though. No doubt about that

2
Swedistan 2 points ago +3 / -1

I disagree. He is saying that Europeans don't understand why you say "n-word" instead of nigger. That's wrong. Most Europeans know why. It's persecution. And it happens here just like it happened over there

23
Swedistan 23 points ago +26 / -3

As a European, I don't see why you guys always have to say 'n word' instead of 'nigger'.

Please don't speak for all of Europe. I'm in Europe and I could possibly go to prison, be fined and lose my job for saying nigger.

"N-word" is how the media refers to it here too

4
Swedistan 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's what they believe. They believe they are a right to steal from you and kill you, and that you have no right to defend yourself.

Why? Because of "racism" or other vaguely defined excuse.

Peaceful coexistence with these people is impossible

16
Swedistan 16 points ago +17 / -1

Where is the picture with the different symbols from? Is it an official document of some sort?

0
Swedistan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Except they are because leftists use any little crack in the system to tear it apart. Everything we call out as ruining our country has been festering since the world wars. The 40s, 50s, 60s were when the seeds were planted. In each community we give an inch and they take a mile. They gain privilege while crying that we dare to exist.

So who would you take away citizenship from? Anyone with family arriving after the 1940s or 50s? Or would you do it based on race?

Would Italians and Irish be white enough? Or what are you proposing exactly?

I don't see how it would solve any of the problems you mentioned by the way

I do not think an ethnostate is right, but I believe it may be neccessary to prevent Russia from not being Russia in the future. I would not go to that exteme for America, but I cannot truly blame Russia for wanting to do so for themselves.

How could possibly the proposed laws be the only way to keep Russia russian?

That makes zero sense to me. I can see a million other possible laws that could make that goal be true.

How can you not blame a country for occupying their neighbours and proclaiming racially based superior rights over the people under their rule?

-1
Swedistan -1 points ago +1 / -2

With that logic you can defend North Korea too.

And any immoral law no matter what. "It's their country"

1
Swedistan 1 point ago +3 / -2

It is Russia, built by the Soviets, now excluding people based on race? How is that right?

There surely has to be a middle ground between demanding racial purity and importing millions of Muslims.

Those are not the only two options

9
Swedistan 9 points ago +11 / -2

I'm not American. But if I was I'd tell them this:

I'll pay reparations for slavery the second blacks pay reparations for black on white crime.

And wait for the theatrical ragequit

-1
Swedistan -1 points ago +1 / -2

Can't. Only existing subreddits accepted. And current eyebleach admins have no reason to come here

Edit: Not sure why I got downvoted

-1
Swedistan -1 points ago +2 / -3

What certainly seems true is that females pretending to be males don't share men's sexual preferences https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116117300430

And it seems like females pretending to be males who previously were attracted to males report a higher propensity to change sexual attraction patterns than females pretending to be makes that allready prefer females. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192544/

And this one seems to indicate a clear pattern of females pretending to be males being attracted to women and girls.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/ahdevor/wp-content/uploads/sites/2247/2016/12/SOIDs.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjS1Y36-LjqAhVQiYsKHTMBBAgQFjAFegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw28pn5gvvSLk8LtxMQpUmOG&cshid=1594049805008

Empirical data seems to fit the predictions of your theories quite well

-1
Swedistan -1 points ago +2 / -3

I'm not sure if that is empirically true. But if it is, it's an interesting theory. Will check it out

-1
Swedistan -1 points ago +2 / -3

I think this is interesting. But doesn't explain the equal size epidemic of females pretending to be males

40
Swedistan 40 points ago +43 / -3

We need eyebleach.win

All pictures of Ivanka and MAGA babes

Maybe some MAGA-puppies and guns as well

-2
Swedistan -2 points ago +1 / -3

I quit reddit for this retarded ass word smithing type of argument. You are a racist

Funny. Most of us quit Reddit because of people like you

I don't have the time for an endless argument where you start phrase parsing my responses and never actually address my comments without taking them out of context or trying to have a "gotcha" moment where you feel as though you've won.

Seems like you are projecting.

I have addressed every poi t you have made.

All you have done is call people "racist" for disagreeing with you.

We're on the same side, except you're a racist who thinks black people should be grateful for slavery.

I'm on the side of Jesse and other rational people who can see that history is not as black and white as you are trying to paint it.

On the side that is nuanced enough to admit the benefits that American slavery has given to Africans in America.

On the side that can see that slavery is wrong while having empathy for black Americans that feel grateful for what American slavery has given them and not call them "bad", "sick", "coon", "uncle Tom" or "racist". But instead stands with them.

-1
Swedistan -1 points ago +2 / -3

Ireland was a shithole until the 1970s, bud. Have you ever heard of the potato famine? Ireland produced enough potatoes for the whole country, but guess who ate them?

So they recovered in a few decades? Guess Africa will recover any day now then?

History is nuanced. Africa was divided into countries without regard to nationality or religion. That's a fact, not a left wing conspiracy.

Most nations are multi ethnic actually. Seems like more silly excuse to me.

Even our dumbest black brothers and sisters are smarter than you.

Even the ones blaming white people for Africa's failiure to thrive? I doubt it. That's a special kind of stupid

-1
Swedistan -1 points ago +1 / -2

Come back when you grow up and formulate some coherent arguments.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›