None of the lower court judge decisions matter when it comes to justice and truth, they have already proven to be crooks.
So when somebody brings up how many cases the Trump team allegedly lost, just let them know how many arsonists, antifa/blm terrorists are on the street freely because of the same judges.
They seem to follow the Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation word for word. It can't be a coincident.
These points are especially prevalent:
-
Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
-
Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
...
- Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
...
-
Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
-
Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
-
Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
...
- Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues
...
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.
...
- Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
...
- Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
...
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
...
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.
- Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
This site is awesome, but it's not adequate for red-pilling normies. There are too much inside-jokes, memes and too fast post turnaround to find relevant information.
We need a well curated platform to which we can refer the normies and low info citizens!
So for example when someone claims there is no evidence for widespread election fraud, we could refer them to an article with a big flashy red sign: Completely false!
And presenting all the relevant, reliable data with sources and archived evidence.
We could create and upvote these fact checking articles here, then the mods could publish it on the fact-checking site, or we could build a wiki like platform. But we need to do it as soon as possible!
This will trigger the lefties, 100% guaranteed.
But in fact, each and every one of us has just as legitimate claim for presidency as creepy Joe, so why can't we use this title?
Hi there, Hungarian pede here.
Some leftists are baffled how it's possible that the conservative party wins the third consecutive election here. Well, it's because the left can't cheat.
As you may now after 40 years in 1989 we managed to kick commies out of our country, so we have quite a bit of experience about their dirty tricks and how to deal with them. We also know that they are like bedbugs and very hard to keep out of the system.
In light of this experience, knowing that nothing is sacred for them, and they despise democracy, we created a voting system in which there is virtually no room for cheating. At least it's extremely hard to cheat with the ballots.
So here are the main aspects you should consider:
- YOU NEED BIPARTISAN VOTING COMMITTEES IN EVERY LOCATION
There is no partisan vote counting, It's insane that in the USA democrat partisans are counting the ballots. It's obviously a conflict of interests, it's like letting criminals judge in their own case. How did you let this happen?
See, in Hungary there is a voting committee in each and every location where voting is possible. Each and every party which has a candidate (and mind you there are more than 2 parties in Hungary) sends delegates who represents them. This polypartisan committee oversees the election from casting the votes to counting.
Every member can individually/manually check every single ballot.
Then every member of the committee has to validate the report with their signatures. If something fishy happens, it goes into the public report. Until everyone signs the report there is no tabulation.
- YOU NEED COMPLETELY TRANSPARENT AND PUBLIC TABULATION
Here if a ballot is unreadable or ambiguously filled, then it's void. No copying shenanigans. There are no shady tabulation softwares, no scanning, everything is paper based. When all the members of the above mentioned committee signs the report, it is published to a government website. Then it is immediately visible to everyone,it's public record, and you can see that each report was validated by the representative of your preferred party on location. If the numbers don't match on the site, any of the representatives can appeal. Everyone can then add up the numbers of these reports and thus check if the status they see on the tv or on the internet are accurate or not.
It's completely transparent, public and validated by each party.
- YOU NEED ID AND RESIDENCY VALIDATION
Here in Hungary for voting you not only need a personal id but a separate document which proves that you live in the area (it's a card "lakcím kártya"). Every citizen has a designated voting location according to there official residency. Everyone who walks in to these locations is then unambiguously identified and matched with the records. Only then they can receive a ballot. No dead people voting here, and nobody can cast votes multiple times, nobody can vote on different location than it's registered.
- MOST IMPORTANT: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS
Mail-in voting is not possible here, unless you live abroad. Even then, chain of custody of such exceptional ballots is tightly regulated and monitored, and publicly tracked. No ballot dumps can appear from out of nowhere. Days before the election it's known exactly how many votes are coming in from each foreign countries. But once again, it's obviously an option exclusively for those who can't travel home for election day. Although I have to say, these mail in ballots here as well suspiciously lean left most of the time...
Having all of this said, and seeing what's happening there in the USA, I find it hilarious that some leftist politicians and media pundits in your country has the audacity to question the legitimacy of our elections. But I also know that you, my fellow pedes, despise these pundits just as much as I do.
MAGA 2020, Sooner or later justice will triumph, don't give up the hope.
Best wishes from Hungary.