1
T-Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's called working on a commission basis, is it not? Car sales is a biggie for that.

12
T-Bear 12 points ago +12 / -0

That's like sending a strongly-worded letter, telling them to stop. They won't.

If entrapment is already illegal, and the courts won't do anything to curtail it, getting more lawyers involved (and wealthier) isn't going to help.

Sounds like a great idea on the surface...but so does gun-control to those who cannot think cause to effect....

7
T-Bear 7 points ago +7 / -0

And just who gets to make that call?

You do realize the Soviet Union made ample use of "mental health" to deny dissidents basic rights, don't you?

EVERY Communist system does. Our own Communist takeover, if it succeeds at the last, will be no different.

5
T-Bear 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you’re someone who has yet to buy a gun, what the fuck are you waiting for?"

Ammunition to go with said firearm.....

8
T-Bear 8 points ago +8 / -0

Shoot...in gangsta culture, this is not a crime. It's a street cred enhancement....

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sorry, but you really don't see the point, even if you're clued in on certain aspects of fact the OP made.

The OP is stating that if the gun-control issue really was about public safety, then simply making it a law not commit murder by ANY means would suffice.

HINT: It's always been illegal, in every culture in every place on earth, to commit murder.

Since such a law, enforced and executed swiftly, has never once prohibited murder from occurring again, then it follows that society has to take extra steps to defend itself, even while certain groups desiring power over others work to counter society's attempt to defend itself from the murderer.

Hence, the OP's REAL argument - that gun control is all about CONTROL of people (not weapons) - stands.

He's not trying to change minds - he's simply wiping the lies and insincere arguments away as the garbage they are.

Sad that you missed that....

1
T-Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Um, that's "Thou shalt not commit murder". The Hebrew of the Old Testament had several different words for killing; only one was absolutely prohibited (murder).

At no time did Jesus state killing that comes in the course of self-defense, a lawful war, or in the course of the judicial process, to be covered under the commandment against murder.

That is a teaching from fallen minds, not from God.

1
T-Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was illegal when Cain murdered his brother Abel nearly 6 thousand years ago (give or take a few).

By tradition, Cain used a nearby small boulder to crush Abel's skull in - since Cain did live and work in a weapons-free zone...

Just goes to show.

Oh, and the Commandment in Exodus 20:13 specifically prohibits premeditated murder born of anger and hatred without cause...not the slaying in self-defense (whether against tyranny, in war, or within a crime event), or the necessary killing required in the execution of a judgment upon a person.

These other forms of killing are very framed with very different Hebrew words, and have specific places and conditions where they may be exercised.

Not all killing is murder.

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

No seems about it.

The 2A states if an enemy, foreign or domestic, can bring a certain kind of weapon to bear upon you and threaten your life and liberty under God, YOU have the right to obtain the resources to acquire the same type of weapon class, educate yourself as to its use and maintenance, and coordinate with others of like mind and resources, to preserve your life and liberty under God.

All weapons means precisely that - all weapons.

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's one skill I don't know how to do...yet.

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

The stunned silence after his question said all that was necessary to say.

3
T-Bear 3 points ago +3 / -0

RCBS and MEC 600 Jr man here.

Inherited Dad's MEC; I've had my Rockchucker since the late 90's.

Stocked up on supplies while they were still available - no telling when this drought will end.

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is DC doing? Importing more voters, because YOU won't vote for what they want.

Population replacement of Americans is the goal.

You only thought they were your public servants, looking out for your cares....

0
T-Bear 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't see you loading up your Minecraft game and heading for the border, do I?

That's the thing with illegals - they don't come with pre-made targeting. UN "peacekeepers" do.

The only way to catch the illegal coming across...is to catch them coming across before they get "processed".

Once "processed", they have full access to the US taxpayer's wallet for everything they need.

14
T-Bear 14 points ago +14 / -0

I made this very case at a recent church board meeting, and got roundly vilified. People simply cannot fathom the depth of this evil.

8
T-Bear 8 points ago +8 / -0

True. We don't know yet how it will pan out.

Thy could just keep these UN "peacekeepers" to the big Blue cities, where they are "safe" and plenty of prey. Much like the Muslim "refugees" in Germany, France, England, and Sweden.

Should those "peacekeepers" find themselves going to the countryside, I think there'd be quite a few people exercising the no bag limit on blue helmets thing...

I could be wrong. We'll see how far down the cuck hole America has gone.

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now, that's funny! Even Kim would find this funny!

45
T-Bear 45 points ago +45 / -0

Blue helmets = target practice. Blue chest emblem = target practice.

UN troops here = invasion force.

Simple enough to understand. Anyone with even a passing knowledge as to what UN troops do to the civilian populations they supposedly "protect" understands this.

Anyone who thinks they are really "peacekeeping troops" is flat out gullible and naïve.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›