.... and activities that remind us of our shared heritage of religious liberty and that teach us how to secure this blessing both at home and around the world.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fifth.
This last paragraph is so strange to me......also any guesses on what "activities" Trump will do to remind him of his "shared heritage and religious liberty both here and around the world...."?
This should be interesting.
No election can happen again until this is solved!!!! Talking to you GEORGIA!
Love,
Texas Pede
From: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sean McGarvey-Bio.docx Date: December 14, 2010 at 8:57 PM To: Hunter Biden [email protected]
Hunter
I will tell you that the Building Trades are at the end of their rope with this administration. They, General President Mark Ayers and Secretary Treasurer Sean McGarvey were told two years ago that Nate Tamarin was the "labor guy." Since then, those that haven chosen to circumvent Nate after "no action" did hear the wrath of Nate. Those that stood up to him - the Ibew, NEA, IAFF, etc.... basically told Nate to go f off - in a nice way. Personally, I was the Teamsters Political Director and under the Bush Presidency - I was able to call Rove, Mehlman, Sara Taylor and Andy Card. Granted a lot didn't get done - but at least we were heard. Whereas now, we have our team in - and Sean has sent an official letter asking for a meeting with Vice President Biden over a year ago, and the reasoning for not getting the meeting is absolutely ridiculous. So what is worse - having our guys in there and no access or having access (like with Bush) with terrible results. Furthermore, the National Building and Construction Trades Secretary Treasurer (who represents nearly 3.5 million members) THINKS that vice president Biden doesn't want to meet with him and his President Mark Ayers. You should not be worried about getting "yelled" at by the Boss or his staff - they should be shitting their pants thinking that - because of miscommunication, the Building Trades think they are being dissed by the Vice President. Personally, the Bldg Trades are too honorable and stuck on protocol. If it were my union - I would have sandwiched the President, VP or their CoS and made sure they knew. All that said, what works best - for you and I - is for you to call Sean first.
Say you talked to me and that you want to get all the facts before you talk to the big guy. This will be good for both of us. What do you think?
------Original Message------ From: Hunter Biden To: Chuck Harple Subject: Re: Sean McGarvey-Bio.docx Sent: Dec 14, 2010 8:20 PM I'll work on it- but is there any issue I should know about before I go around everyone and straight to him- if I ask he will do it- but if I am missing something legit then i will get killed by staff. R. Hunter Biden Rosemont Seneca Partners On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote: Btw, just got off with Sean. Told him we talked. He and President Ayers personally thanked me and said it is good to know that what we were thinking about the VP may be totally wrong. I don't even want to get in what I have heard that they were told why the. Vp couldn't meet. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:15:04 To: Hunter Biden[email protected] Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Sean McGarvey-Bio.docx Sean's cell [email protected] Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: JiaQi Bao [email protected] Subject: Louisiana + Thornhill Energy (TE) | Project TE Meeting Minutes #2,10/19 (Thursday) Date: October 23, 2017 at 10:00 AM To: Hunter Biden [email protected], [email protected]
,> ** [email protected]**> ,
Gongwen Dong [email protected],
Mervyn Yan [email protected]
Please find attached for a summary of our meeting with Tom Thornhill in New Orleans. Any editing advice and comments from you would be greatly appreciated. For easy viewing on mobile phones, please check the PDF version. The same document's word DOCX version is also attached just in case. Thank you. Best Regards, JiaQi JiaQi Bao | | [email protected]
From: Jeffrey Cooper [email protected] Subject: Re: Next steps Date: January 28, 2015 at 8:41 AM To: Devon Archer [email protected] Cc: Hunter Biden [email protected], Hunter Biden [email protected], MALEMANM [email protected]
Devon, On #1, also remember that there will be costs for attorneys, translators etc for reviewing the data. I think it will roughly double the cost to approximately $750k but I am trying to drill down on those figures (excuse the pun) and get a budget done ASAP.
Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Devon Archer [email protected] wrote: 1. I will discuss dataroom fee with Burisma today. 2. Ultimately this is a negotiation if we move forward with this consortium so each group will probably want its own counsel Aleman and Burisma. We need to discuss the subtlety there. It will be difficult for me to ask for fees from Burisma for Boies, where Hunter's of counsel, representing both sides. Let's discuss. 3. Integrating Vuk here is difficult without Emilio making that clear. Maybe we separate the efforts if that's not possible and maybe that's Emilio's intention because of the Board cross over. Let's just determine that asap and plan from there. It will require a new follow up meeting arranged by Miguel with PEMEX as the 27th was a meeting Vuk and Emilio have arranged.
Devon Archer 646 436 3745
On Jan 28, 2015, at 12:02 AM, Hunter Biden [email protected] wrote:
Gentlemen, I thought it would be useful to list immediate actions that need to take place in order for us to pursue the Pemex privatization opportunity. Below is my understanding of what needs to be done, but I am sure each of you will have things to add or clarify.
1-We need to gain access to the "data room" being made available for a fee by Pemex/ Ministry of Energy. My understanding is that there is a fee (roughly $350K) that needs to be paid. I believe Burisma is willing to front that fee (Devon?). Burisma needs an official letter/ document/ explanation of some sort that details what paying that fee entitles them to, and also a detailed plan of who from our consortium will handle the review of the data being provided by Pemex. I would suggest that we identify the technical personnel from Burisma (Devon?) and the Spanish speaking technical personnel from Mexico (Miguel/Jeff?) that can begin that review in concert as soon as possible. I believe we need to have the fee and team in place to begin their review by February 6th at the latest.
2-
Several partnerships need to be formed that will ultimately constitute the consortium or entity that will bid on the opportunity identified after we have a chance to review the available data. The first partnership will be the Aleman entity. This will consist of whomever Miguel determines is necessary to his family's team. I believe the current idea is that the Aleman Group will include a U.S. entity that is currently controlled by Jeff and Hunter. We need to finalize the structure of that entity, which includes determining equity, control, where the entity will be legally domiciled, etc... The second step is to determine the legal structure of the Burisma group. The third step is to determine how those two entities exist as one- again equity, control and where that entity is incorporated all needs to be worked out. I would suggest that we have The law firm of Boies Schiller begin to think about the best way of going about this. I believe Burisma will be willing to front the fees to Boies for this and we could also possibly include the firm in a small piece of the equity of the overall opportunity if we feel it's appropriate and makes sense financially. I can begin to coordinate this with your approval. (Full disclosure I am of counsel to the Boise law firm, and they have a deep understanding of Burisma from prior representation). I would assume that Boise would act in full concert with the legal team Miguel has suggested in Mexico. One last point on this. I (in full disclosure) will most likely be granted equity (commensurate with Devon) from the Burisma side. I am also currently 50% of the equity of the U.S. Entity that conceivably would partner with the Aleman group. Obviously that has to be taken in consideration when the final consortium is formed. It may make more sense that I land on one side or the other before the two ultimate entities are formed. So Miguel- please advise Jeff whom in your operation will coordinate with Boise. Devon will identify the appropriate Burisma employees. I will coordinate with Boise to put it al together. This needs to be completed by the middle of February.
3- Finally, once we have the above accomplished we should be in a very good position to make the most of the planned meeting on 2/27 in Mexico City. One additional key to that is making sure Pemex communicates to Vuk that the Aleman Group is "The" group to partner with. We all know that is a fact and it simply needs to be communicated to Vuk who is a board member of Pemex and a very close friend of the CEO. That will just make things easier for us.
RHB 202.333.1880
