I didn't make a list. What's up with this strawman? I provided a link to article about a study by Stanford. The study has all the details, and all the links. The study is the evidence.
Keep trying. I'm sure someday you will win an argument on the internet.
There are 67 citation links in total. Many of those citations have multiple links associated with them. Often, one has to dig further into the link to read the relevant article cited, as they are often quite large. Sometimes they are books.
There are 11 citation links that explicitly deal with the subject you mention.
And you claim that the 5 you cherry picked prove you are correct?
Please call your parent or guardian over and tell them to turn off your internet.
You don't get to lie to people about "finding faults" and then try to weasel out of it. That link has the information you say you wanted, you just chose to ignore it, or were too lazy to go look at the citations provided.
But, please, whine some more.
You mean mine with Stanford in the authors list? The cardiology division? The one that lists dozens of links that you decided to cherry pick and find the ones that didn't support the conclusion instead of the others that did?
Or did you mean someone else's?
Here's the archive link if the original gets memory holed.
What is the pattern? That you are deliberately looking for Jewish heritage? That most elite bankers and donors live in NYC, which has a plurality of Jewish people? That these folks want their backs scratched?
You looking at race or population distribution?
Neither has anything you have replied with. You've consistently shit on everything here. And been shown to be a lazy reader/responder.
All you have are assertions. Nothing you've posted has shown why your argument is correct. Everything you have posted has shown you to be disingenuous.