US CONSTITUTION Article VII "The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same."
<P>The Constitution is a compact between the states. Out of that compact the SC derives the power and duty to try cases under that Constitution to settle controversies between the states "in law and equity."
<P>The seven deserted their post in a time of constitutional crisis.
Incorrect. The test in Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife, as Scalia wrote it is: to show "they have suffered an injury in fact, i. e., a concrete and particularized,** actual or imminent invasion of a legally protected interest**."
<P>That states have an interest that the other states live up to their bargain in the Constitution. And the harm iif not actual because the EC has not yet met is certainly imminent because they will meet in the near future on a date certain and the outcome is a foregone conclusion in the due course of things.
Standing is an issue? The Constitution is a compact between the states and it's breech is a breech of contract and a breech of a sacred oath to God. If the SC will not enforce the Constitution then the five cucks are cowards.
Why would they sue? They are in charge. Just pass a resolution stating the facts, invalidating the certified slate and naming the electors for the state. It's a US constitution thing. The governor and administrative state have nothing to do with it.
Every time I have seen Pence take on some cuck he leaves a grease spot in the road. Trump has many talents, but debating is not one of them. Pence on the other hand is a master.