1
Technologically 1 point ago +2 / -1

Those "demands" are a childish pipe-dream.
You can't make demands of "technology companies", they don't claim to represent your interests. You can't measure or restrict politicization unless you plan on restricting freedom of speech. There is no such thing as non-partisan review left.

All effort should focus on the only two things that matter, open investigation of election fraud, and future verifiable elections. Nothing matters if the vote doesn't matter.

2
Technologically 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it dooming to point out that voting clearly doesn't matter? If voting doesn't matter, what's the goal of "this community"?

2
Technologically 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you surprised a Fortune 500 CEO would write letters that follow the media narratives? He actually has a fiduciary responsibility to not fight the narrative...

1
Technologically 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair elections would have given us 4 more years of America First. Which would have given us the prosperity to balkanize the middle-class and deflect communist rule.

1
Technologically 1 point ago +1 / -0

We live in a society! You need to worry about everyone's health. Just stop worrying about who is voted to dictate our health.

1
Technologically 1 point ago +1 / -0

My elections identify as transparent, why are you such a bigot?

3
Technologically 3 points ago +3 / -0

You should choose your words more carefully, lest you unknowingly support non-citizen voting because they bought a pack of gum. You probably meant income tax payers, but even then do you lose your vote the year you go through bankruptcies? Consider landowner only with new laws to bar foreign ownership of land.

2
Technologically 2 points ago +2 / -0

Take care, frens, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God. He's fighting for you.

view more: Next ›