Ok racist
Well you sound like a disgruntled upset liberal so I’m just gonna move on from this pitty party
Now this makes me smile ❤️🇺🇸
SCOTUS has held that an election of any United States official can be challenged based on fraud or error by a writ of quo warranto. And the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the proper venue to challenge the election of a sitting President is the D.C. District Court
https://www.leagle.com/decision/1915775238us5371732 https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35/#:~:text=§%2016–3544.&text=In%20a%20quo%20warranto%20proceeding,if%20either%20party%20requests%20it.
SCOTUS has held that an election of any United States official can be challenged based on fraud or error by a writ of quo warranto. And the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the proper venue to challenge the election of a sitting President is the D.C. District Court
https://www.leagle.com/decision/1915775238us5371732 https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35/#:~:text=§%2016–3544.&text=In%20a%20quo%20warranto%20proceeding,if%20either%20party%20requests%20it.
SCOTUS has held that an election of any United States official can be challenged based on fraud or error by a writ of quo warranto. And the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the proper venue to challenge the election of a sitting President is the D.C. District Court
https://www.leagle.com/decision/1915775238us5371732 https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35/#:~:text=§%2016–3544.&text=In%20a%20quo%20warranto%20proceeding,if%20either%20party%20requests%20it.
SCOTUS has held that an election of any United States official can be challenged based on fraud or error by a writ of quo warranto. And the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the proper venue to challenge the election of a sitting President is the D.C. District Court
https://www.leagle.com/decision/1915775238us5371732 https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35/#:~:text=§%2016–3544.&text=In%20a%20quo%20warranto%20proceeding,if%20either%20party%20requests%20it.
Says who? You?
Yep you nailed that one. Lol
Lol well clearly you are hell bent on being pissed off. And if you didn’t know, you are not the only one...WE ALL ARE.
But it solves absolutely nothing - if anything, it’s giving the left EXACTLY what they want. Don't stoop to their level.
That’s all I’m gonna say about that.
Lol yeah- ok whatever. I tried
Deport this commi
Wrong. What you are witnessing now in D.C. is an attempt to criminalize use of the law, research, investigations and discussion. War has been declared on the MAGA movement. Our weapon is the law. Don’t give up on it yet. It may still save us.
All of the cases brought before the election were not quo warranto actions, and therefore such cases faced difficult procedural hurdles. All were also somewhat premature in that quo warranto actions may be instituted only after the contested office is taken over.
I can assure you that Biden and Pelosi and the whole anti-MAGA universe is focused on misdirecting your attention from quo warranto.
So far they have done a good job of manipulating attention spans. We need to steer the ship back on course. Defending their bogus attacks is the wrong tactic. The COUNTERPUNCH is** quo warranto**. We will see you in court.
Wait huh? Are you a troll?
Or read here https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Look up “quo warranto”
quo warranto
quo warranto
Two words: Quo warranto
Interesting summary from https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
“I can assure you that Biden and Pelosi and the whole anti-MAGA universe is focused on misdirecting your attention from quo warranto. So far they have done a good job of manipulating attention spans. We need to steer the ship back on course. Defending their bogus attacks is the wrong tactic.
The COUNTERPUNCH is quo warranto. We will see you in court.
What you are witnessing now in D.C. is an attempt to criminalize use of the law, research, investigations and discussion. War has been declared on the MAGA movement. Our weapon is the law. Don’t give up on it yet. It may still save us.”
Impeachment is used to remove a President who was legally sworn in.
A Writ of Quo Warranto is used to remove a person who was illegally sworn in as President.
Right- same here. I mean he’s never been the type to go down without a fight but who knows.
I don't understand why they are doing this? I thought they were on their (DNC's) side?
I knew FEMA was behind this! Many underestimate the level of power that FEMA actually has