None of these will happen. Only solution is physical war.

SCOTUS failed us. DOJ failed us. And there are more than enough Republican turncoats in the House and Senate that the other won't happen too.

Seriously what do you think the outcome will be if we just sit back and wait for the government to save us.

Is this legit?

def vote(): return "BIDEN" if random.randint(0,100) >= 10 else "TRUMP"

Republicans MUST be allowed to observe up close. This is critical.

Good, quick dismissal so it can go to appeal to SCOTUS faster.

Where were these peoples brains during the debates? Ugh.

Can Trump just leak all unredacted documents himself? Surely he has a copy of them...

I say fuck protocols. Do it.

I hear you but what does this mean? Say for example SCOTUS doesn't side with Trump. Does that mean Trump is going to assume the role of President anyways? Are we going to have two people claiming the role of President? Where does it actually go?

I agree. But Trump is just one president. The entire apparatus is against him. It's only a matter of time before the other side gets control.

Do you have a source that they ignored it? Trying to redpill a friend.

If you haven't figured it out yet, the Republicans are complicit in all of this. They want the country to die apparently.

"Future elections" lol good one

Can anyone confirm CNN said this?

And Romney will let it happen. We'll never see another Republican president again if Trump doesn't fight this and win in the courts.

I can confirm this. I am running similar analysis now and so far my results are matching these.

I am running a script now similar to this. I pulled voter registration data and am validating it against absentee ballots received. So far I have found 267 people age 100 or older in Michigan who had an absentee ballot received. The script is still running.

That China overseas vote.

Icing on the cake is the registration says he lives on MARX STREET

I have downloaded it and am running it against the ballot search now.

UPDATE:

Ok guys, I've downloaded the October 2020 data.

I filtered it down to voters with a birth year less than or equal to 1930, and I'm running it now against the registration/ballot information. I'll let you know the results.

So far I've found three voters born in 1919 that submitted absentee ballots.

"I have the ability" ok then do it. I'm sick of these people leading us on.

I've already downloaded the data set. 2.6 GB that I filtered down to 3.9 MB (only people born on or before 1920).

The website probably doesn't support searching for years less than 1900.

So cool, voters from 2 or older centuries ago are still voting.

Is it worth running the analysis with that number of entries?

UPDATE I have downloaded the October 2020 data and filtered by birth year less than 1920. There are 15,360 entries. Have not validated them against the registration data yet.