It's exactly the same issue. Pennsylvania was allowing votes to come in, and be counted, after election day. That defeats the entire purpose of having a uniform election day.
Contact Fox news, and tell them why you're not watching their cucked broadcasts anymore:
The Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, that you cannot allow voting to continue after election day:
“When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)
If an election is consummated after Election Day, this also violates the statute, and such behavior, along with State legislation that encourages it, is preempted by 3 U.S.C. § 1. The logic of such a prohibition goes directly to the heart of the evils Congress sought to nullify by creating a uniform Election Day.
Single day elections curtail a distortion of the voting process by concealing results that might influence later voting. The “object” of 2 U.S.C. § 7, as noted by the Supreme Court, was to remedy multiple evils involved with non-uniform voting. Therefore, under the unanimous holding in Foster v. Love, federal elections consummated before, and after, Election Day, are preempted by Congressional statutes.
Federal law absolutely prohibits any voting to continue after election day, as did state law in Pennsylvania. It's time for this nonsense to stop.
Also, if someone can figure out a way to distill this into a digestible meme or infographic format, you'd be doing God's work.
These illegal lockdowns are destroying people's lives. People are losing their livelihoods, their homes, and being driven to depression and even suicide in extreme cases. It is wrong, and we need to act.
Contact the officials who gave the illegal orders. Contact the judges who refuse to strike them down. Organize protests and prayer vigils at government buildings or the homes of the officials.
Have regular times to keep the pressure up. Focus energy on the most egregious examples (no church, but strip clubs allowed) that will redpill people on the injustice.
We already have lots of witnesses who state they observed the back-dating of ballots. Election workers, postal employees, etc. Call them as witnesses.
The evidence is overwhelming, which is why these leftist judges keep dismissing the lawsuits without allowing any hearings on the evidence. While that's annoying, it's going to be good for us in the long-term, because a district court's findings of fact are hard to overturn, while findings of law are much easier to overturn.
If they were really thinking about long-term strategy (like Trump does), they would have allowed the evidence to be presented, and issued a finding that it doesn't prove anything. But they would run the risk of people actually paying attention to the evidence, which could turn public opinion completely against them. So, they decided to dismiss everything and pray the Supreme Court can be intimidated into letting it happen.
These social media companies want to pick and choose what content is allowed on their site. Ok, they have that right as a private company.
That is called being a publisher. Companies that select what they want to publish, like book publishers, newspapers, blogs, or television stations, are responsible for the content that they publish. If it is defamatory, they must pay damages.
If they want to act like a publisher, picking and choosing what viewpoint to endorse, then they should be liable for defamatory content on their site. If they don't want to be liable for that, then they should stop censoring views that they don't like. It's the way the law works for everyone else, and that's how it should work for large social media companies.
The Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, that you cannot allow voting to continue after election day:
“When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)
If an election is consummated after Election Day, this also violates the statute, and such behavior, along with State legislation that encourages it, is preempted by 3 U.S.C. § 1. The logic of such a prohibition goes directly to the heart of the evils Congress sought to nullify by creating a uniform Election Day.
Single day elections curtail a distortion of the voting process by concealing results that might influence later voting. The “object” of 2 U.S.C. § 7, as noted by the Supreme Court, was to remedy multiple evils involved with non-uniform voting. Therefore, under the unanimous holding in Foster v. Love, federal elections consummated before, and after, Election Day, are preempted by Congressional statutes.
Federal law absolutely prohibits any voting to continue after election day, as did state law in Pennsylvania. It's time for this nonsense to stop.
Also, if someone can figure out a way to distill this into a digestible meme or infographic format, you'd be doing God's work.
The Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, that you cannot allow voting to continue after election day:
“When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)
If an election is consummated after Election Day, this also violates the statute, and such behavior, along with State legislation that encourages it, is preempted by 3 U.S.C. § 1. The logic of such a prohibition goes directly to the heart of the evils Congress sought to nullify by creating a uniform Election Day.
Single day elections curtail a distortion of the voting process by concealing results that might influence later voting. The “object” of 2 U.S.C. § 7, as noted by the Supreme Court, was to remedy multiple evils involved with non-uniform voting. Therefore, under the unanimous holding in Foster v. Love, federal elections consummated before, and after, Election Day, are preempted by Congressional statutes.
Federal law absolutely prohibits any voting to continue after election day, as did state law in Pennsylvania. It's time for this nonsense to stop.
Doing the lords work
Speaking of which, in addition to contacting our officials and taking action, we also need to remember to pray. There is no doubt in my mind that our opponents, who want to murder babies, give sterilizing hormones to children, and kill white people, are being driven by spiritual forces of evil:
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. (Ephesians 6:12)
President Trump and many officials and attorneys are doing their job fighting all of this corruption and evil. Now, we need to do ours, supporting them in spiritual warfare and prayer!
The Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, that you cannot allow voting to continue after election day:
“When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)
If an election is consummated after Election Day, this also violates the statute, and such behavior, along with State legislation that encourages it, is preempted by 3 U.S.C. § 1. The logic of such a prohibition goes directly to the heart of the evils Congress sought to nullify by creating a uniform Election Day.
Single day elections curtail a distortion of the voting process by concealing results that might influence later voting. The “object” of 2 U.S.C. § 7, as noted by the Supreme Court, was to remedy multiple evils involved with non-uniform voting. Therefore, under the unanimous holding in Foster v. Love, federal elections consummated before, and after, Election Day, are preempted by Congressional statutes.
Federal law absolutely prohibits any voting to continue after election day, as did state law in Pennsylvania. It's time for this nonsense to stop.
They say "Easter worshipper" because it sounds like "Ishtar worshipper." Many of these people are in mystery schools, like Skull & Bones, high level Freemasonry, and other strange cults that worship the old pagan gods:
This rediscovered name for God is revealed as 'JAH BUL ON' It is regarded by Royal Arch Masons as too holy to be uttered by one person, therefore it needs three masons to utter one syllable each.
Masonic writers agree that this is a composite of three gods. JAH for Yahweh. BUL for Baal. ON for Osiris.
https://www.yorkriteofcalifornia.org/royalarch/ra_education/Holy%20Royal%20Arch%20-%20Jabelon.pdf
That's not what we mean when we talk about Easter. We are talking about Jesus Christ dying for our sins so that humanity can be saved by grace. They want to mock that message, because they hate Christianity.
Thanks, Obama!
Contact Fox news, and tell them why you're not watching their cucked broadcasts anymore:
Yes, we are fighting against the Democrat election riggers. But the real enemy, the real power behind this corruption, is Satan himself:
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. (Ephesians 6:12)
President Trump is doing his job fighting all of this corruption and evil. Now, we need to do ours. Prayer warriors, MOUNT UP!
Fox News has lost all credibility. They called the election for Biden, knowing there was widespread fraud and legal challenges. Then they fired Judge Jeanine because she was telling people the truth, and ordered their hosts to tell people to "move on."
We're moving on, alright. Moving on from Fox News.
Remember, remember, the fifth of November
Election rigging and plot
I see no reason why Democrat treason
Should ever be forgot
President Trump is doing his job fighting all of this corruption and evil. Now, we need to do ours:
if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land. (2 Chronicles 7:14)
We need to repent of our sins, repent of the sins of our land (abortion, corruption, sexual immorality, sloth, etc.) and ask God to heal our land. If we do this in faith, God will heal our land, and make America greater than it ever was before. Prayer warriors, MOUNT UP!
He is doing his job fighting all of this corruption and evil. Now, we need to do ours:
if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land. (2 Chronicles 7:14)
We need to repent of our sins, repent of the sins of our land (abortion, corruption, sexual immorality, sloth, etc.) and ask God to heal our land. If we do this in faith, God will heal our land, and make America greater than it ever was before. Prayer warriors, MOUNT UP!
Q said Israel will be one of the last places to get cleaned up. There are a lot of good people there, but there also a lot of bad. We need to worry about our country, winning this election, and we can pray for places like Israel to get their act together as well.
Former vice president Joe Biden repeatedly said on The View on Friday that he believed Anita Hill from the moment he heard her tale of sexual harassment by Clarence Thomas. But he previously told Sen. Arlen Specter that it was clear her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee included lies.
“Not only didn’t I vote for Clarence Thomas, I believed her from the beginning. I was against Clarence Thomas, I did everything in my power to defeat Clarence Thomas and he won by the smallest margin anyone ever won going on the Supreme Court,” Biden told “The View’s” Joy Behar.
But in 1998, Biden admitted to Specter that “It was clear to me from the way she was answering the questions, [Hill] was lying” about a key part of her testimony. The exchange was published in Specter’s 2000 memoir, “Passion for Truth: From Finding JFK’s Single Bullet to Questioning Anita Hill to Impeaching Clinton.”
https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/28/joe-biden-on-anita-hill-in-1998-she-was-lying/
Former vice president Joe Biden repeatedly said on The View on Friday that he believed Anita Hill from the moment he heard her tale of sexual harassment by Clarence Thomas. But he previously told Sen. Arlen Specter that it was clear her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee included lies.
“Not only didn’t I vote for Clarence Thomas, I believed her from the beginning. I was against Clarence Thomas, I did everything in my power to defeat Clarence Thomas and he won by the smallest margin anyone ever won going on the Supreme Court,” Biden told “The View’s” Joy Behar.
But in 1998, Biden admitted to Specter that “It was clear to me from the way she was answering the questions, [Hill] was lying” about a key part of her testimony. The exchange was published in Specter’s 2000 memoir, “Passion for Truth: From Finding JFK’s Single Bullet to Questioning Anita Hill to Impeaching Clinton.”
https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/28/joe-biden-on-anita-hill-in-1998-she-was-lying/
Get a reliable weapon, get some magazines and ammo, and make sure your rifle is properly zeroed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtzqHnGKc-g
Then, pray to God we never have to use them.
We wouldn't lose a civil war. Especially not if we had even a fraction of the US military on our side. Where we would lose is that our country would turn into an absolute hellhole, with the possibility that we never recover. It's not a road we want to go down unless we absolutely have to.
It's in the middle of the page. Here's the direct link:
The Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, that you cannot allow voting to continue after election day:
Federal law absolutely prohibits any voting to continue after election day, as did state law in Pennsylvania. It's time for this nonsense to stop.