https://twitter.com/RedEagle_MAGA/status/1345473082283225088

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Send this letter to your Senator to demand they object to certifying any elector from any contested state that had no meaningful audit of the vote! We need to show these spineless Republican's we are millions strong. Use this letter or not but just contact your Senator now.

Easy way to contact your Senator:

• Click link: https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact
• Choose your State
• Click the contact link
• Use the web form to enter your information and message.
• Click Submit.

Dear Senator,

I request you exercise your Constitutional and statutory authority to object to the certification of any elector from any state that refuses to allow a meaningful audit of the November general election for electors to the Presidency, which must include: 1) a re-canvass of the vote that authorizes independent confirmation of a signature match using the same standards the same election officials use for nomination petitions, recall petitions, and initiative petitions; 2) publishing of the ballots for the world to review and observe, as states promised when they wrote large taxpayer checks to election machine companies like Dominion and others; and 3) audited review of the voter rolls to insure only qualified voters cast ballots for electors to the Presidency. If a state refuses to allow an honest audit of the vote, then I request you object to the certification of any electors from that state which has refused such an audit. At present, this includes the electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

There is reason for my concern. The state legislatures in the respective states chose a method for choosing electors to the Presidency that cabined who qualified to vote, constricted the manner in which a vote could be cast, and circumscribed how the vote could be counted. Many of the restrictions and requirements for each of those three were not followed by several of the states in question. President Carter warned in 2005 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. The New York Times agreed in 2012 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. Jurists, experts, and election officials all concurred that mass mail-in balloting posed the greatest risk of fraud. We just had the biggest absentee-ballot driven election in American history. Yet, the very safety guardrails of this election were systemically and systematically removed, often without the assent or consent of the state legislatures, despite the express promise and explicit protection of the Electors Clause to the Constitution. Midnight counts outside the meaningful observation of poll-watchers. 11% signature mismatches according to the Democratic expert in the election contest in Arizona. Votes from dead people, non-citizens, and non-residents found in the research of Matt Braynard and Richard Baris. Is it really too much to ask that states publish the ballots they promised to publish? Is it really too much to ask that states allow an independently confirmed signature match, at least to a statistically significant sample, of the absentee ballots? Is it really too much to ask for the states to affirm that only those qualified to vote cast ballots for the Presidency?

The Supreme Court directed any remedy to you, and Congress, when it declined to hear the case brought by the state of Texas, a suit joined by the Attorneys General for 18 states representing more than 100 million Americans, 126 members of Congress, high ranking state legislators from the objectionable elections of the states at issue, and public interest advocacy groups representing millions of Americans. I ask that you do me the small favor of simply objecting to electors under the circumstances herein described. At a minimum, it can give confidence to me, and more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump, that our concerns about this election were taken seriously and meaningfully addressed in the only place the courts have directed remedy can occur: the halls of Congress.

The Constitutional conscience of the country depends upon the choices you make. Many thanks for your kind attention to these critical concerns.

Thank You,

XX YOUR NAME XX

Before you watch the many Hearings on the 2020 Election Issues, Please take a minute and listen to some very powerful words from Mr. Scott Adams.

The 2020 election was #NonTransparent by force #Bullying to cheat https://youtu.be/rNM3K0cH2tc

• 11/25/20 Pennsylvania State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSDZkXxFVEU

• 11/30/20 Arizona State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rri6flxaXww&t=39440s

• 12/1/20 A truck driver with USPS says he was suspicious of his cargo load of 288,000 COMPLETED ballots https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0xaA4dYsbQ

• 12/1/20 Michigan State Senate Committee on Oversight Holds Hearing on Election Issues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0-vyw9qbdw

• 12/2/20 Michigan House Oversight Committee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbVe66Y86g4&t=21s

• 12/2/20 Witnesses Testify at Michigan House Oversight Committee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjTOSDZ0BE&t=8s

• 12/3/20 Georgia Senate Committee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e35f4pUIYOg

• 12/11/20 Wisconsin Election Fraud Public Hearing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PxOYdYCFPA

• 12/16/20 U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Election Fraud Hearing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aM6q5sstAaE

• 12/23/20 Georgia House Hearing on Election Fraud, Brad Raffensperger to Participate https://youtu.be/R4cuakECmuA

• 12/26/26 Dozens of Georgia witnesses step forward to expose election irregularities—Pt1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RV57sFsojA

• 12/30/20 Georgia State Senate Holds Meeting on 2020 Election Fraud https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos

Send this letter to your Senator to demand they object to certifying any elector from any contested state that had no meaningful audit of the vote! We need to show these spineless Republican's we are millions strong.

Easy way to contact your Senator:

• Click link: https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact
• Choose your State
• Click the contact link
• Use the web form to enter your information and message.
• Click Submit.

Dear Senator,

I request you exercise your Constitutional and statutory authority to object to the certification of any elector from any state that refuses to allow a meaningful audit of the November general election for electors to the Presidency, which must include: 1) a re-canvass of the vote that authorizes independent confirmation of a signature match using the same standards the same election officials use for nomination petitions, recall petitions, and initiative petitions; 2) publishing of the ballots for the world to review and observe, as states promised when they wrote large taxpayer checks to election machine companies like Dominion and others; and 3) audited review of the voter rolls to insure only qualified voters cast ballots for electors to the Presidency. If a state refuses to allow an honest audit of the vote, then I request you object to the certification of any electors from that state which has refused such an audit. At present, this includes the electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

There is reason for my concern. The state legislatures in the respective states chose a method for choosing electors to the Presidency that cabined who qualified to vote, constricted the manner in which a vote could be cast, and circumscribed how the vote could be counted. Many of the restrictions and requirements for each of those three were not followed by several of the states in question. President Carter warned in 2005 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. The New York Times agreed in 2012 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. Jurists, experts, and election officials all concurred that mass mail-in balloting posed the greatest risk of fraud. We just had the biggest absentee-ballot driven election in American history. Yet, the very safety guardrails of this election were systemically and systematically removed, often without the assent or consent of the state legislatures, despite the express promise and explicit protection of the Electors Clause to the Constitution. Midnight counts outside the meaningful observation of poll-watchers. 11% signature mismatches according to the Democratic expert in the election contest in Arizona. Votes from dead people, non-citizens, and non-residents found in the research of Matt Braynard and Richard Baris. Is it really too much to ask that states publish the ballots they promised to publish? Is it really too much to ask that states allow an independently confirmed signature match, at least to a statistically significant sample, of the absentee ballots? Is it really too much to ask for the states to affirm that only those qualified to vote cast ballots for the Presidency?

The Supreme Court directed any remedy to you, and Congress, when it declined to hear the case brought by the state of Texas, a suit joined by the Attorneys General for 18 states representing more than 100 million Americans, 126 members of Congress, high ranking state legislators from the objectionable elections of the states at issue, and public interest advocacy groups representing millions of Americans. I ask that you do me the small favor of simply objecting to electors under the circumstances herein described. At a minimum, it can give confidence to me, and more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump, that our concerns about this election were taken seriously and meaningfully addressed in the only place the courts have directed remedy can occur: the halls of Congress.

The Constitutional conscience of the country depends upon the choices you make. Many thanks for your kind attention to these critical concerns.

Thank You,

XX YOUR NAME XX

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors will not comply with the subpoenas to turn over Dominion machines for a forensic audit. Instead, the supervisors voted 4-1 to file a court complaint in response. I heard they are unhappy with all of the calls they are receiving.

STEVE GALLARDO- DEMOCRAT -DISTRICT 5 [email protected]

• 602-506-7092

CLINT L. HICKMAN- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 4 [email protected]

• 602-506-7642

BILL GATES- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 3 [email protected]

• 602-506-7562

JACK SELLERS- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 1 [email protected]

• 602-506-1776

Steve Chucri cast the ONLY opposing vote.

Tell him "Thank you for standing up for transparency"

STEVE CHUCRI- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 2 [email protected]

• 602-506-7431

They must comply. Call these people and give them an ear full.

The Senate Subpoenas: https://www.azmirror.com/2020/12/15/senate-issues-subpoenas-for-all-ballots-voting-machines-to-audit-maricopa-county-election/

Video Link of Board of Supervisors Meeting on Subpoenas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2JndZDZXBo

The Board of Supervisors Filing: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/65534/Complaint

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors will not comply with the subpoenas to turn over Dominion machines for a forensic audit. Instead, the supervisors voted 4-1 on Friday to file a court complaint in response.

STEVE GALLARDO- DEMOCRAT -DISTRICT 5 [email protected]

• 602-506-7092

CLINT L. HICKMAN- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 4 [email protected]

• 602-506-7642

BILL GATES- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 3 [email protected]

• 602-506-7562

JACK SELLERS- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 1 [email protected]

• 602-506-1776

Steve Chucri cast the ONLY opposing vote.

Tell him "Thank you for standing up for transparency"

STEVE CHUCRI- REPUBLICAN -DISTRICT 2 [email protected]

• 602-506-7431

They must comply. Call these people and give them an ear full.

The Senate Subpoenas: https://www.azmirror.com/2020/12/15/senate-issues-subpoenas-for-all-ballots-voting-machines-to-audit-maricopa-county-election/

Video Link of Board of Supervisors Meeting on Subpoenas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2JndZDZXBo

The Board of Supervisors Filing: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/65534/Complaint

Disclaimer: This is a letter I wrote to reply to the letter sent out by weak Senators explaining why they won’t fight for free and fair elections. Feel free to use this letter to let your Senator you don’t accept their reasons for not fighting and they need to act now. I am not a lawyer and most of these statements have been clipped from multiple sources and edited to compose this letter. So, lots of plagiarism, sorry but I think it covers all of the points.

Easy way to contact your Senator:

• Click link: https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact
• Choose your State
• Click the contact link
• Use the web form to enter your information and message.
• Click Submit.

[LETTER START]

Dear Senator/Representative,

I am writing to express my deep concern over the 2020 federal elections and the fraudulent activity that has taken place across several states. One can only conclude that you are ether ignorant of the fraud, complicit with the fraud, or have some knowledge that has not been made public. I am requesting a detailed reply as to why you have not acted and stood up against disenfranchising the will of the people with targeted election/voter fraud designed to overturn the outcome. I would also like you to address each findings of Peter Navarro report “The Immaculate Deception” and explain why or why not the claims are creditable. Please don’t reply with the same “copy and paste” form letter that many Representatives have already sent out.

The letter that explains:

• The Electoral College met and cast their votes for Joe Biden.
• United States Justice Department announced that they have found zero evidence of voter fraud.
• Memo from the GSA to officially begin the transition process.
• United States Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit by the State of Texas, asking to throw out votes from 4 battleground states.

Electoral College: The Electoral College cast their votes knowing no true audit was ever conducted. Refused to do any signature matching. Stonewalled all request for transparency. Destroyed and tampered with evidence. Violated their own states elections constitutional laws. Removal or concealment of evidence is grounds for a second (corrective) election. There's no way to legitimately certify an election in which crucial information has been deliberately destroyed, or in which corrupt officials and judges refuse to let the evidence be duly examined.

United States Justice Department:

• Have refused to follow up with any witness or allegations.
• Spied on the 2016 President Trump campaign.
• Covered up an investigation Hunter Biden that would have prevented a baseless impeachment.
• Covered up information that proved Rep. Swalwell was compromised by a Chinese spy
• Additionally, they allowed 4 years of accusation against President Trump they knew were false and helped perpetuate.
• There are many more examples of this outrageous display political bias but I will move on in the interest of brevity.

If you still insist the Justice Department has any credibility left, I have three words for you "General Michael Flynn".

United States Supreme Court: United States Supreme Court abandoned its constitutional duty to resolve a real and substantial controversy among states that was properly brought as an original action in that court. This leaves no cause of action between the States when one State is disenfranchised by the illegal conduct of another State in violation of the elector’s clause. At this point, it is a fact several battleground states willfully and flagrantly violated their own constitutional elections laws in favor of one candidate. The cases put forward only asked to throw out verifiably fraudulent votes or ballots cast unconstitutionally, not to deliberately overturn anything. Of course, it may result in overturning election results but let’s be clear what was asked. What reason does anyone have for counting fraudulent or unconstitutional ballots?

In every case I'm aware of, judges have dismissed based on standing, ripeness, or some other procedural matter. We can’t get relief from the court system because you can't sue before the election; can't sue during election; can't sue after election No standing, Laches, Moot. Please name a single case where evidence was examined, where discovery occurred, where depositions were taken. When judges won’t allow these cases to be heard, it is NOT proof of anything other than possible moral cowardice, corruption, dereliction of duty and smacks of a political agenda.

Example: When President Trump campaign did sue PA before election, this is what a federal court said: "the problem with the campaign's argument of potential voter fraud was that it was "speculative", and therefore the President Trump campaign had no legal standing in federal court."

This complete shut out of the court process should frighten every American.

GSA Memo: Using the memo from the GSA as proof that the election process was legitimate is ridiculous. As a point of fact, the letter that the General Services Administration's administrator, Emily Murphy, sent to “President-Elect” Joe Biden authorizing his transition does not state he won the election. Furthermore, Murphy did not say she had made an "ascertainment". This was despite an internal email from the White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, seen by The Wall Street Journal saying that Murphy had indeed made the ascertainment. Murphy's letter was two pages and highlighted the "thousands of threats" she had received. President Trump publicly urged Murphy to release the funding in order to protect her.

This entire process has exposes all of these institution’s corruption and proved they no longer have any credibility. The double standards are glaring and it is tyranny, plain and simple. Is there any doubt, if this was happening to the Democrats what they would do? They would fight. Why wont the Republican’s band together and stand up to those who want to disenfranchise millions of American voters by legitimizing this stolen election?

.” - Joseph Stalin “The people who cast the votes decide nothing; the people who count the votes decide everything

It is very clear that this is what is happing in America right now. They have control over every lever of power that was intended to prevent this. We know the culprits include Democrats and RINO Republican’s that believe they are better off without President Trump.

• Maya Angelou "Courage is the most important of all the virtues because without courage, you can't practice any other virtue consistently."

We know that witnesses, lawyers, and even judges have been threatened in varus ways. Because of this, they fear to act against this great evil. We pray that you find the courage to stand up against this treason and protect the country.

• Senator Josh Hawley "74 million Americans are not going to shut up."

We will not shut up and we are watching what you will do in this critical time. The Peaceful Transition of Power is Contingent on a Free and Fair Election. Our evidence has never been refuted, only ignored. We want representation now. The Constitutional conscience of the country depends upon the choices you make. I hope and pray that you will do the right thing. May God bless you, and continue to bless the United States of America.

Thank You, XX YOUR NAME XX

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and most of these statements have been clipped from multiple sources and edited to compose this letter. So, lots of plagiarism, sorry.

Easy way to contact your Senator:

• Click link: https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact

• Choose your State

• Click the contact link

• Use the web form to enter your information and message.

• Click Submit.

• LETTER START -

Dear Senator/Representative,

I am writing to express my deep concern over the 2020 federal elections and the fraudulent activity that has taken place across several states. One can only conclude that you are ether ignorant of the fraud, complicit with the fraud, or have some knowledge that has not been made public. I am requesting a detailed reply as to why you have not acted and stood up against disenfranchising the will of the people with targeted election/voter fraud designed to overturn the outcome. I would also like you to address each findings of Peter Navarro report “The Immaculate Deception” and explain why or why not the claims are creditable. Please don’t reply with the same “copy and paste” form letter that many Representatives have already sent out.

The letter that explains:

• The Electoral College met and cast their votes for Joe Biden.
• United States Justice Department announced that they have found zero evidence of voter fraud.
• Memo from the GSA to officially begin the transition process.
• United States Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit by the State of Texas, asking to throw out votes from 4 battleground states.

Electoral College: The Electoral College cast their votes knowing no true audit was ever conducted. Refused to do any signature matching. Stonewalled all request for transparency. Destroyed and tampered with evidence. Violated their own states elections constitutional laws. Removal or concealment of evidence is grounds for a second (corrective) election. There's no way to legitimately certify an election in which crucial information has been deliberately destroyed, or in which corrupt officials and judges refuse to let the evidence be duly examined.

United States Justice Department:

• Have refused to follow up with any witness or allegations.
• Spied on the 2016 President Trump campaign.
• Covered up an investigation Hunter Biden that would have prevented a baseless impeachment.
• Covered up information that proved Rep. Swalwell was compromised by a Chinese spy
• Additionally, they allowed 4 years of accusation against President Trump they knew were false and helped perpetuate.
• There are many more examples of this outrageous display political bias but I will move on in the interest of brevity.

If you still insist the Justice Department has any credibility left, I have three words for you "General Michael Flynn".

United States Supreme Court: United States Supreme Court abandoned its constitutional duty to resolve a real and substantial controversy among states that was properly brought as an original action in that court. This leaves no cause of action between the States when one State is disenfranchised by the illegal conduct of another State in violation of the elector’s clause. At this point, it is a fact several battleground states willfully and flagrantly violated their own constitutional elections laws in favor of one candidate. The cases put forward only asked to throw out verifiably fraudulent votes or ballots cast unconstitutionally, not to deliberately overturn anything. Of course, it may result in overturning election results but let’s be clear what was asked. What reason does anyone have for counting fraudulent or unconstitutional ballots?

In every case I'm aware of, judges have dismissed based on standing, ripeness, or some other procedural matter. We can’t get relief from the court system because you can't sue before the election; can't sue during election; can't sue after election No standing, Laches, Moot. Please name a single case where evidence was examined, where discovery occurred, where depositions were taken. When judges won’t allow these cases to be heard, it is NOT proof of anything other than possible moral cowardice, corruption, dereliction of duty and smacks of a political agenda.

Example: When President Trump campaign did sue PA before election, this is what a federal court said: "the problem with the campaign's argument of potential voter fraud was that it was "speculative", and therefore the President Trump campaign had no legal standing in federal court."

This complete shut out of the court process should frighten every American.

GSA Memo: Using the memo from the GSA as proof that the election process was legitimate is ridiculous. As a point of fact, the letter that the General Services Administration's administrator, Emily Murphy, sent to “President-Elect” Joe Biden authorizing his transition does not state he won the election. Furthermore, Murphy did not say she had made an "ascertainment". This was despite an internal email from the White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, seen by The Wall Street Journal saying that Murphy had indeed made the ascertainment. Murphy's letter was two pages and highlighted the "thousands of threats" she had received. President Trump publicly urged Murphy to release the funding in order to protect her.

This entire process has exposes all of these institution’s corruption and proved they no longer have any credibility. The double standards are glaring and it is tyranny, plain and simple. Is there any doubt, if this was happening to the Democrats what they would do? They would fight. Why wont the Republican’s band together and stand up to those who want to disenfranchise millions of American voters by legitimizing this stolen election?

• Joseph Stalin

“The people who cast the votes decide nothing; the people who count the votes decide everything.”

It is very clear that this is what is happing in America right now. They have control over every lever of power that was intended to prevent this. We know the culprits include Democrats and RINO Republican’s that believe they are better off without President Trump.

• Maya Angelou

"Courage is the most important of all the virtues because without courage, you can't practice any other virtue consistently."

We pray you find courage to stand up against this treason.

• Senator Josh Hawley

"74 million Americans are not going to shut up."

We will not shut up and we are watching what you will do in this critical time. The Peaceful Transition of Power is Contingent on a Free and Fair Election. Our evidence has never been refuted, only ignored. We want representation now. The Constitutional conscience of the country depends upon the choices you make. I hope and pray that you will do the right thing. May God bless you, and continue to bless the United States of America.

Thank You, XX YOUR NAME XX