I’m just really happy that all the shills telling us to not vote seem to have disappeared.
Small victory for us.
He gets how it works but his solution is garbage.
You fight defamation with defamation.
The moral high ground is dead and useless.
How did this even get downvotes?
This is dead on.
Spiking the football on this is the most retarded thing I have seen here since “hey everyone let’s not vote anymore”.
What would make me feel better is if you could let go of that autism to be less offended and more effective.
And yet you responded to my comment in which the context did involve what to do.
Almost like the spaz comment is projection.
Weird.
You going to answer my question?
All I saw was you take advantage of a definition designed to portray leftists in a good light and just apply it to yourself.
You also didn’t address your absolute incompetence in terms of how you react to language changes which stood a chance of being successful unlike your own effort.
I’m fine with ignoring that for now though.
The worst part is you just spent a decent amount of time on me here, a place where your opinion hardly matters because we already understand what you are trying to say.
To better explain my opinion it’s better to be effectual. I just feel like the libertarians who constantly and autistically fight that fight really waste their energy.
You’re right. We should totally leave the name of the video alone because 99% of the people reading the title totally won’t assume this refers to the police officer.
You’re right. I should give up and marginalize myself completely.
Reduction of influence is reduction of power.
You likely know that already. Thus why you’ve taken your current position.
Honestly that’s the real difference between being part of a legit investigation and just being the target of a bunch of women complaining about you.
Loser shill position.
This is another entity we should be influencing from the inside.
Abandoning items we largely have control of is low energy, defeatist, and simply a quick way to lose.
We don’t live in a free market because government allows illegal corporate monopoly positions.
That’s by far the most important factor.
Can I ask you a simple question.
Why are you so insistent on muddling a message in regard to the definition of liberalism. Something which the modern definition has been established for 30 years.
But you’ll roll right over when people more recently redefine scores of terms like alt right, white supremacy, racism, terrorist, insurrection, violence, etc?
I feel like boycotting sports is another shill loser position honestly.
Look at the accounts. It’s the same people telling us to not vote and to hate the police.
We have full majority control of these leagues. Why give that up because there’s a couple retards at the top.
This isn’t the FBI nonsense where Hannity defends a majority of idiots in DC.
Outside of the NBA something like 70% of the players know this is bullshit. And certainly the organizations up to and maybe including many owners know this as well.
We need to identify and root out subversive social Marxism when we can and these sports leagues are great opportunities to be battlegrounds for change rather than just surrendering.
This might be a good time to note that despite having voter ID laws Colorado instantly turned to a blue state the moment Dominion entered the picture there.
On really any subject we are talking about there are no instant fixes. Our solutions like universal voter ID are often good. But we have to fully administer the systems correctly or else illegal scumbag cheating (which is the activity Dominion enables here) will continue to occur.
I very much appreciate the work you do. It’s massive and appreciated.
One item you might want to consider is to separate Benfords law as a different item.
Benfords law won’t indicate the presence of illegal or modified ballots if they are part of the physical paperwork, instead it indicates the presence of modified data after the fact via software or human editing.
Illegal ballots wouldn’t change the Benford graph so I feel like it’s best to have that as a separate additional piece of independent evidence rather than lumping it in with ballot fraud.
Thanks so much again for the hard work.
I disagree on various points to a certain extent but that’s fine.
My point was that browser movement typically happens at a faster pace than the speed where people change search.
The real issue is mobile. Until good mobile devices change default browser and search it’s going to be a little harder. You kind of touched on that.
Lol! Imagine having to use politicians who lost their last 3 combined elections as an example of why I’m wrong.
We are actually at step 1 of Google relinquishing it’s hold on search.
It’s crazy to think they would give up on ad words in such a way.
It’s clear by their own design that they don’t value the quality of their product however.
Step 2 will be the slow movement away from their site.
I guess with Chrome they feel more secure but that shouldn’t. The public at large is used to a continual transition from browser to browser throughout time.
Many people are conditioned but most have now embraced the notion that the quality of google results are crap.
They seem to forget the whole reason people initially moved to google was the clean interface and actual good search results.
Not sure google would go broke but I think ads are still >60% of their revenue.
Ehhhh, this is corporatist.
It’s just going to legitimize what is already happening behind the scenes in men’s college athletics.
Shoe companies pick and choose which schools they run and control and recruit the players from high schools.
This guy still has his job?
It’s been a while. Do native Americans feature prominently in the original or are they just going over the top to compensate?
Haha yeah if nothing else the past 20 years have been a master class on how liberals can turn fallacy into reality.
Boomers didn’t generate wealth.
They inherited it and gave it all away to other nations.
While simultaneously raiding public funds to the point where we are on the verge of bankruptcy.
What is this response. Some sort of divisive shilling?
Joe Rogan is informative depending on the guest but he is not news.
Please don’t elevate that guy the way the Gen X people elevated Jon Stewart to “news” it’s cringe af.