4
TheDeSantis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can I ask you a simple question.

Why are you so insistent on muddling a message in regard to the definition of liberalism. Something which the modern definition has been established for 30 years.

But you’ll roll right over when people more recently redefine scores of terms like alt right, white supremacy, racism, terrorist, insurrection, violence, etc?

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +2 / -1

I feel like boycotting sports is another shill loser position honestly.

Look at the accounts. It’s the same people telling us to not vote and to hate the police.

We have full majority control of these leagues. Why give that up because there’s a couple retards at the top.

This isn’t the FBI nonsense where Hannity defends a majority of idiots in DC.

Outside of the NBA something like 70% of the players know this is bullshit. And certainly the organizations up to and maybe including many owners know this as well.

We need to identify and root out subversive social Marxism when we can and these sports leagues are great opportunities to be battlegrounds for change rather than just surrendering.

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +1 / -0

This might be a good time to note that despite having voter ID laws Colorado instantly turned to a blue state the moment Dominion entered the picture there.

On really any subject we are talking about there are no instant fixes. Our solutions like universal voter ID are often good. But we have to fully administer the systems correctly or else illegal scumbag cheating (which is the activity Dominion enables here) will continue to occur.

13
TheDeSantis 13 points ago +13 / -0

I very much appreciate the work you do. It’s massive and appreciated.

One item you might want to consider is to separate Benfords law as a different item.

Benfords law won’t indicate the presence of illegal or modified ballots if they are part of the physical paperwork, instead it indicates the presence of modified data after the fact via software or human editing.

Illegal ballots wouldn’t change the Benford graph so I feel like it’s best to have that as a separate additional piece of independent evidence rather than lumping it in with ballot fraud.

Thanks so much again for the hard work.

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree on various points to a certain extent but that’s fine.

My point was that browser movement typically happens at a faster pace than the speed where people change search.

The real issue is mobile. Until good mobile devices change default browser and search it’s going to be a little harder. You kind of touched on that.

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol! Imagine having to use politicians who lost their last 3 combined elections as an example of why I’m wrong.

4
TheDeSantis 4 points ago +4 / -0

We are actually at step 1 of Google relinquishing it’s hold on search.

It’s crazy to think they would give up on ad words in such a way.

It’s clear by their own design that they don’t value the quality of their product however.

Step 2 will be the slow movement away from their site.

I guess with Chrome they feel more secure but that shouldn’t. The public at large is used to a continual transition from browser to browser throughout time.

Many people are conditioned but most have now embraced the notion that the quality of google results are crap.

They seem to forget the whole reason people initially moved to google was the clean interface and actual good search results.

Not sure google would go broke but I think ads are still >60% of their revenue.

2
TheDeSantis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ehhhh, this is corporatist.

It’s just going to legitimize what is already happening behind the scenes in men’s college athletics.

Shoe companies pick and choose which schools they run and control and recruit the players from high schools.

2
TheDeSantis 2 points ago +2 / -0

This guy still has his job?

16
TheDeSantis 16 points ago +16 / -0

Haha yeah if nothing else the past 20 years have been a master class on how liberals can turn fallacy into reality.

7
TheDeSantis 7 points ago +7 / -0

Boomers didn’t generate wealth.

They inherited it and gave it all away to other nations.

While simultaneously raiding public funds to the point where we are on the verge of bankruptcy.

What is this response. Some sort of divisive shilling?

7
TheDeSantis 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is one of the most ill informed things I have read on here in a while.

To be clear I’m not saying Gen X is going to be your personal political Jesus.

What I am saying is that if you have any chance Gen X is it.

Baby Boomers are 100% selfish fucks who want to sell the nation out.

Millennials are emotional morons who think they can invent new economics to solve their economic illiteracy.

At least Gen X has perspective compared to those two.

What other generation do you suggest has a better chance to help?!?!

Bro, think this one through!

3
TheDeSantis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its ok to go on there if you want.

FB is already dead.

They have just convinced advertisers that their data is relevant.

More importantly though if you log on to fb or insta clear your cookies / cache and restart your browser when you are done.

In addition get rid of the fucking apps on your phone.

They are likely pulling 60% of your info from the apps and another like 30% via cookies from embedded code on “partner sites”.

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why the new politifact brigade around here is so infuriating.

No, I don't care that the article about Biden said he has two dogs which shit on the carpet when he actually only has one.

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just think it’s funny people bring up anaconda in the Gartz context because I would be shocked if that user was an adult with all of the emo flip flopping he does.

-3
TheDeSantis -3 points ago +1 / -4

Not going to lie. I’m on the fence.

Here’s why I think he’s innocent: The moving the goalpost bullshit. First it was underage, then it was trafficking. Now it’s prostitution.

Here why I think he’s in trouble: There’s some sort of truth here in that he put out the idea of a resignation and won’t tell the full story publicly.

If I had to guess I would say he had some sort of onlyfans setup going which is embarrassing af as a congressman. And the feds convinced a girl to say the payments were for sex.

All that being said this particular time is literally like mid-disclosure so anyone jumping to any conclusions today is likely going to be eating some sort of crow later on.

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t doubt that those absentee ballots are fake but by connecting them to Benfords law you’re creating some confusion.

If ballots were illegally manufactured the results still would follow Benfords law.

Benfords law is a sign of electronic data manipulation. By where the natural distribution of counting results indicates a level of tampering with data after the fact.

If the point is just to maintain multiple levels of evidence perhaps you might just want to make that more clear.

2
TheDeSantis 2 points ago +2 / -0

With the amount of makeup she’s wearing right now I don’t think she’s going to make it to her presidential run before she looks old and busted.

6
TheDeSantis 6 points ago +6 / -0

“Once you buy into my premise, based on the concept of demoralization. You too will come to the conclusion that there’s nothing you can do to prosecute these people who broke multiple federal and state laws.”

6
TheDeSantis 6 points ago +7 / -1

I mean I’m pretty sure it’s actually a Punch Out reference but knowing that doesn’t really make me feel good.

6
TheDeSantis 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s kind of a possibility but dude said this girl doesn’t even exist.

Maybe it’s some bullshit fed by China like this post suggests?

1
TheDeSantis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with this.

Like there is SOME element of truth here but there’s 1000 other better ways to bring light to it.

Also I wouldn’t call it a “cash cow” just a form of eternal victimhood.

And to be fair the Arab community did a horrible job of hand waving that legitimate victimhood away by treating them like shit for the last 70 years.

Now with all that being said the reason you get these comments is that the shill accounts spend the most time in the new section along with their upvote bot friends.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›