Put: http://hereistheevidence.com on them
This is from last year, my dude. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text
I personally believe that the first thing Trump should do rather than starting his own station would be buying a majority share of oan or something along those lines. They've been radically pro-trump the whole time, although they do make claims that they are unbiased so maybe having his own Standalone channel would be better.
Problem with impeaching is if you do it too much and for no good reason it simply means impeachment loses its meaning.
Now if we happen to have some dirt on the current president, maybe connections to foreign countries and Powers, compromising material on him and his family and his son, or evidence of any kind that the election was stolen, that might be worth an impeachment.
But I scoured all over CNN and MSNBC and I've seen nothing of the sort so I think that this impeachment is just nonsense.
It's actually two dozen different pictures. And I link to my own Facebook post only because it was the simplest way to put them all into initially shareable narrative. I wish the Donald would let us share batches of photos
DISCLAIMER: My whole adult life I've voted third party. I've ALWAYS advocated for a third party rather than the "two" uniparty parties.
Trump changed that. Trump was a disruptor.
He was the first presidential candidate from a main party I voted for (I've voted for Green, Libertarian, Constitutional etc.) - because he actually took the name "republican" seriously - one for the Republic. I didn't vote for him in '16 because he was too much of an unknown, and I believed the "hype" the media spun about him, but he proved me wrong again and again until I couldn't wait to pull the lever (or fill in the oval) for him in 2020.
Now he's rumored to be thinking about starting his own party, and that suddenly fills me with trepidation. It runs the risk of repeating history and merely crippling the "conservative/constitutional" cause.
Dan Bongino lays this out pretty well in his show from today, so I'm sharing it here.
If it's on social media which preload URLs I share this one chunk at a time, usually stopping at or around the next URL:
You don't think there's evidence?
Well, https://hereistheevidence.com/
But there is a lot there, so let's break it down:
First, for a simpler read that concisely summarizes a lot of the problems across all of the states can be found in Peter Navarro's work which is only 36 Pages, here: https://www.larslarson.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20.pdf
If you want a far more in-depth look at some of the evidence of the more elaborate fraud, here's a 270 page summary of the evidentiary filings of Sidney Powell. Note that she had over 2700 page lawsuits that she has filed, which even with typos is an astonishing feat of accomplished in such a small amount of time. Most people don't appreciate that a case like this can often take years to put together.
https://www.zenger.news/sidney-powell-document-binder-2020-election-fraud/
Here's just one small pocket of votes that would completely overturn, for instance, Georgia: https://rumble.com/vcdwmv-georgia-election-data-reveals-17650-votes-switched-from-trump-to-biden-.html
In fact, Pennsylvania was so bad that their legislature wrote to decertify their electors but Governor wolf was unwilling to convoke a session of the legislature and it was unclear whether they could convoke themselves or not.
And of course there are probably 40 hours of hearings with various state legislatures where evidence after evidence was presented. But that was not a court, only I hearing.
Here's six hours just from Arizona: https://youtu.be/LQWsH4SE6e4
Here's one of the Georgia Senate hearings, also about 7 hours: https://youtu.be/hRCXUNOwOjw (there was another that was about 4)
And then there was the Integrity of the ballots sent and received, which is also significantly in question on a number of different fronts.
Matt Braynard did a comprehensive study and found that, amongst other things, Republicans who sent an absentee ballots had a 40% chance I believe it was of not having their ballots received and counted. And something like a quarter of them had ballot requested in their name that they did not request, and subsequently some of those people then tried to vote and were forced to vote what's a contingent ballot, many of which may have never been counted, while the others had somebody voting in their name: https://youtu.be/XH9ihoLi1NA
I am fully comfortable with the fact that some of these claims May well be debunked. But there is enough here, especially when the pocket of votes is so staggeringly tiny oh, that it wouldn't take much in any of these states to completely overthrow the election results.
But nobody was ever willing to look at the evidence in a legal case. And these legal cases have so much evidence, that you would have heard because it took 7 + hours to present a basic summary of the fact in the Senate hearings that I posted above. In a trial with back and forth and evidence and counter evidence and everything else, it would have gone on for weeks.
I know you remember how long the OJ trial lasted. Any one of these cases in one of these states would have gone that long.
I actually played a very small part in putting together some of the evidence. For instance, I found that Allegheny County in Pennsylvania, which is Pittsburgh, had official ballots online that you can print off: https://www.loom.com/share/92bfc08d9894412baa9fbe8fca2362a2
Maricopa County similarly in Arizona had balance that you can turn off. I shot a video about this one as well it was slightly different. D's Work official Dominion balance and so what they had in mind was technically a sample ballot but as I show in this video the way that they put the sample on the ballot was easily removable and in no way affected the actual ballot with seems like an utterly terrible idea: https://www.loom.com/share/73f2bee4cb0244b68dd856f0484aa9c9
We also saw that the Dominion voting machines, without even talking about vote switching, could have an adjudication error rate of between 60 and 90% in certain counties.
When a vote is adjudicated it goes to a third party who gets to look at it and decide who to vote for.
There are hundreds of signed affidavits that show that this adjudication process was not monitored. Poll Watchers in Paul Challengers couldn't even see the regular ballots, but in most of the precincts where the adjudication took place it took place out of you of anybody and usually with simply one person doing the adjudication.
Here's a sloppy video I Shot to show how easily you could shift the vote to to 5% with the tiniest of effort: https://youtu.be/GE5_bvMW8tg
None of this requires International raids 2 servers in Germany or vote switching courtesy of the Italians in the Leonardo Spa, which there are currently people sitting in jail for in Italy right now with signed affidavit saying that they switched votes here in the United States.
But you can discount that 100% And Trump still won.
BONUS: RE: THE "SIEGE" OF THE CAPITAL:
There is a LOT of evidence suggesting that the gist of the "false flag" was a starting of the problem and then urging of actual supporters to "join" the riot.
-
Multiple sources from people in the ground, including one of the leading War correspondence in the world, who has been to over fifty antifa rallies and knows how they operate, who verified that there was definitely some admixture: https://youtu.be/4bIeKj7fZ8U
-
And here's some footage that shows John Sullivan, BLM activist who's advocated for violent Insurrection Etc, in the front lines of the Capitol protest, where the woman got shot. He was right there with his Cohorts egging the whole situation on, right were Ashli Babbitt was shot, and when she was shot, he immediately leveraged it to get people further riled up. https://youtu.be/5nvqvvsqJ_s
-
Meet Aaron Mostofsky. Wearing a potentially stolen police vest and riot shield, he said this to the NY Post: “We were cheated,†he told The New York Post, parroting President Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud. “I don’t think 75 million people voted for Trump — I think it was close to 85 million.â€
Sure sounds like a trump supporter.
But "Mr. Mostofsky, 34, is the son of Kings County Supreme Court Judge Steven Mostofsky, who also goes by Shlomo. He and his father are registered Democrats, according to New York State election records."
- Trump gave his speech late. Very late. Like over an hour late. And because of that the crowd arrived at the capital "later" than expected. In fact, the "insurrection" etc. started before President Trump was done speaking: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/01/timing_doesnt_line_up_for_trump_to_have_incited_violence_at_the_capitol.html CF: https://unwokenarrative.com/posts/trump-did-not-incite-violence-proof
The Timeline Has Been Debunked 12:00PM Trump begins speech
12:40PM Violent protestors arrived at the Capitol
01:09PM Conditions were poor and efforts were made to call in the National Guard.
01:11PM Trump concludes his speech
01:50PM Capitol was breached, prior to already being attacked for ~ 1 hr.
01:56PM Earliest that Trump speech attendees could arrive at the Capitol. (There's a 45-minute walk between the Trump's speech location and the Capitol)
In fact, rioters who breached the perimeter would have had to leave before Trump’s speech even began (at 12pm precisely) to make it in time for the events as they are detailed by authorities.- CF: https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/ex-capitol-police-chief-says-pelosi-mcconnells-sergeants-at-arms-refused-security-measures-while-new-timeline-proves-trump-incitement-claims-bogus)
- There is even SOME evidence that SOME in the capital MAY have facilitated the breach. You've seen the police moving the barriers and waving the people in, but they also broke out a window and left it unguarded, and let go people who broke windows: https://youtu.be/FViI4X7tLdM
As long as they can prevent election reform from happening, they'll never have to worry about that again. Didn't you know that our whole country turned blue and 2020. That was the beginning of the snowball.