This was the plan all along. It's why DJT told everyone to vote in person. Every state where judges or executive branch modified the election rules from legislative law will get thrown out. They knew this in advance. They were warned.
They didn't stop counting.
They counted and destroyed Trump votes (unofficially) to know how many fraudulent ones to produce.
Want I want to know if how Fox became the trigger for the plan. Way to much coordination for this to be a secret. Way to much information moving around.
Election 2020
Seems that in these discussions that what is missing is a big picture 50,000ft thinking of what may have taken place last week and in the past.
My hypothesis is this entire COVID situation was manufactured, including with the media, to give cover for all the fraudulent behavior, not just mail in ballots, to “explain the voting differentials”. What is missing is establishment of a baseline to show this difference in its totality. So the questions is, if we take a typical normalized baseline election for a given location, how much and where is the deviation from our current election. This is a tactical and strategic discussion.
The fundamental question
The overall big picture is alignment of fraud that takes place: • Local Fraud at your city or county level. What is included here: o Throwing away legit ballots o Introducing fraudulent ballots Copying over and over legit ballots (e.g. same signature) Incorporation of completely made-up ballots or changed ballots. • Systemic Fraud that across regions within states. This would be the software modifications for vote flipping, as an example.
What is needed is baseline data where all the data should be available for comparison with this election: • Propose 2008 Obama election. Doubtful the progressives cheated much in this election. If they did it would be cooked in already and hard to pull apart. o Pick characteristic counties and cities that red and blue. The following information breakout would be needed: President and federal down ballot voting. What is the range of deviation from President to Senator to Congressman. What percentage are President only. You might include some state races to understand how much local/national red/blue voting you get. Percentages of in-person, absentee and provisional for each. Total populations in each area.
Use this baseline data and compare with same location with normalized population distributions. Then we could compare how they are similar and where the differences are located. This basically becomes subtraction math and shows any pattern outages. Voting behavior doesn’t change that much over time I don’t think.
If this makes sense, the first step, and the one I cannot do is collect the raw data.
I remember watching VA and thinking he would win. Fox calling AZ was the trigger for this.
It seems to me the dems were engaged in their normal cheating process that goes uncontested and it wasn't going to be enough, then the just went all in.
This was nationally coordinated with the press and their polls starting the narrative.
My points exactly. Go after what is against the law, today right now. The conspiracy is true. The vote changing is true. There are known, provable issues without any of that, first.
The big picture is that changes in what the legislature said or "uneven" application thereof are illegal. These consent degrees are 100% illegal and impact the former.