12
TheTaintTickler 12 points ago +15 / -3

My thoughts exactly, it’s like watching football game with a team that has to drive 90 yards in 30 seconds with no timeouts. Can it happen? Sure, but the other side has to screw up massively. It’s not going to happen and it hurts to watch.

25
TheTaintTickler 25 points ago +25 / -0

He got out after 3 years, this is more about expunging his record. Read the full text.

2
TheTaintTickler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does that mean the legislature has to re-vote or does it go back to them as a “veto” they can overturn?

1
TheTaintTickler 1 point ago +1 / -0

They need 2/3 of the current sitting senators: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(ckqohworngnjqy3sqidrce5x))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectname=mcl-Article-XI-7&query=on&highlight=Impeachment

As of now, the republicans have a 22-16 share. They would need 26 to vote to impeach thus making this unlikely.

by Korec
2
TheTaintTickler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got my BA in it from a formerly conservative military college, looks like we are peas in a pod here.

2
TheTaintTickler 2 points ago +2 / -0

It doesn't look likely to actually happen, we need a 2/3 vote for expulsion. Would have to have the MSM put the pressure on the Dems to pull it off: https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Discipline/

by Jotoku
3
TheTaintTickler 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need to do an American version of this. Anyone know the exact type of test kit he used? Bet we could get one.

by Korec
2
TheTaintTickler 2 points ago +2 / -0

I encourage you to look at the Yom Kippur War in ‘73. The Moroccans actually sent troops to fight the Israelis in Syria.

5
TheTaintTickler 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is going to sound reaaaalllly stupid, but what is Q? I know it’s related to Q Anon but I’m not sure what that is either.

5
TheTaintTickler 5 points ago +5 / -0

We all did, he’s going to get primaried so hard in 2022.

Would love for Jim Jordan to step in but we need him to go after that RINO Portman on the Senate in 2022.

by Bullelk
2
TheTaintTickler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Said this above:

They have “joined” the suit in “amici curiae”. Basically, they have an vested interest in the case and will aid the court in making a determination by offering advice and providing evidence. From what I gather though, this is NOT a full on joining of the suit which is still an option. Basically they have joined the case but not fully joined Texas.

by Bullelk
3
TheTaintTickler 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have “joined” the suit in “amici curiae”. Basically, they have an vested interest in the case and will aid the court in making a determination by offering advice and providing evidence. From what I gather though, this is NOT a full on joining of the suit which is still an option. Basically they have joined the case but not fully joined Texas.

2
TheTaintTickler 2 points ago +2 / -0

This might be the best video I've seen today and given all that is coming out of this site, that is saying something.