9
TheWhitestOfFangs 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's absolutely horrible. Anyone knows if this appears in Robert Kennedy Jr. book about Fauci? (already pre-ordered...)

1
TheWhitestOfFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Time to have a shore-party on the beaches of China then...

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope the next frame is really bloody...

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shiva asks the right questions and identifies the right issues. If only he wasn't such a self-centered prick and undermine his case at every corner and actually work with people - this would've been so much further now.

I honestly respect the dude, but he needs to be less of a prick and get so much further...

1
TheWhitestOfFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be clear, that's not a question - that's the title of the video...

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

The post has been deleted... anyone know what happened? Any other (independent) sources confirming this?

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be clear - the article itself (which you can't see from this) stated in the title that it's a Covid death, then it's a Covid-related death and finally that there was an "underlying condition" that was the core of the issue...

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good lad! https://i.ibb.co/txrfmxY/image.png

I tried sharing this originally, but the picture was refused, so I just shared the direct link instead...

3
TheWhitestOfFangs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, unlikely. I'd demand to see more proof to be convinced this is not fake/photoshopped/whatever.

1
TheWhitestOfFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

This statement requires sources/citation/proof

1
TheWhitestOfFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

So much inconsistency between what she says there and what she says on TYT. If she wasn't so inconsistent, I might even believe she was honest. She is not.

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe that one of the senators' assistances//underlings is the source, but they will keep anonymous until no longer in position. My ASSUMPTION is that they are spreading the information now knowing it's important to let the public know without exposing the source - which will be exposed and exonerate them later when can be exposed. But I totally agree, it's a difficult thing to trust statements without any proof and I still want proof to give this statement the punch it needs.

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Couldn't that asshole just cancel the membership and go somewhere else without doing zie reich thing?

1
TheWhitestOfFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just want to point out it was already happening for a rather long time. I'm not sure what this specific statement / regulation is supposed to change anything.

It's bad, but it's not really new.

6
TheWhitestOfFangs 6 points ago +6 / -0

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1445090512101384195

I think they got severely hacked and frantically trying to do damage control... My guess.

2
TheWhitestOfFangs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, you could guess with ease based on his public statements... I'd probably enjoy meeting him and sitting on a good whiskey.

view more: Next ›