Have y’all considered that trump is aware he can shuffle those appointments around at a whim and thus, politics weighs heavily in to those decision, yet this isn’t the case with a Supreme Court nom and he does, in fact, realize it’s a lifetime appointment? Half of you want FOAM PARTY FUCK BOI RUBIO and his think tanks to win the argument and pick the seat!
This isn’t true. She ruled against gop staring that because the governor had ALLOWED religious gatherings that means he has to allow political gatherings. I’m not sure how people on this site are so knowledgeable about the other 2 branches but just clearly know fuck all about how the judiciary works. It was a shit argument a high schooler would make and no judge in the country would take it seriously. We need to bitch about our state level operatives and legislators in that case, if they can’t devise an argument for something other state’s literally never questioned since it’s just a cut and dry first amendment issue, but they totally fucked up the argument. Judges don’t hear an argument and then rule on whatever issues the argument make spring in to their mind and then just hand down edicts. They rule on the merit of the argument....
He’ll still be the president then regardless, so how the hell does that even make sense?? These people are lunatics
That’s not how courts works, so I don’t know how that’s possible. The governor has a right to enact executive orders, the outcome of those orders can be argued against for various reasons. In this case, they likely could’ve won if they’d made a non-brain dead argument. “Just throw it out” isn’t even an actual option, it wasn’t even being asked for in this case. Either you already have a completely formed opinion or you don’t, but you should at least understand what you are arguing against here. Imagine if it were a Trump enacted executive order you liked and she threw it out based on an unrelated argument from the Dems.
“She adopted two kids from Haiti” is not a positive or negative. But muh immigration...did you read her dissent when the circuit struck down trumps ban based on usage of welfare, etc? no, I can answer for you, you didn’t.
As for the lockdowns: The circuit unanimously agreed that the gov allowing some church services didn’t mean they also had to allow political events because it’s a retarded argument that no judge would allow. They can just sue based on first amendment protections, like the religious groups did...
These points are literally just low information or intentional disinformation
Everyone has their opinion, and that’s totally fine with me, but I just get bothered when people are blatantly misrepresenting the facts in our circle. That’s the Dems job.
Concern trolls. Wait and see how much the liberals love her Lolol. If trump picks her, it’s right. In fact, she’s the one person on the list GOP RINOS and other “think tanks” DIDNT lobby to get her in there. He’s avoiding another Sandra Day O’Connor and some of us, evidently, want to fuck it up.
She’s defended 2A, she dissented when the circuit court shot down trumps immigration order related to use of government services being a reason to block immigration, she seems good all around. The covid thing is being heavily misrepresented, it was a very poorly argued case by incompetent gop players in Illinois as usual. Look it up to see what is going on with these accounts spreading that message.
That still implies the sentence itself doesn’t make sense and should be rephrased...
Well I guess idk what I’m talking about. Thank you.
They did raise the millennials though, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
Kabbala, “received tradition”. It may not be the origin as relativism was argued far earlier with the sophists than the origin of Kaballa as far as I am aware, but I think you are right in terms of it being the origin of when teachings in the Torah may have most become coopted to mean “whatever I’d like” via “received tradition”. That also explains the fundamental breakdown in world view between sects within that religion. Really all groups, it’s the root imo.
Has for a few thousands years heh. My point being, our culture is largely based on the western ideal that largely won: objectivism, and relativism is probably the largest root cause of issues created by the democrats. Even in your example, positing the question itself implies there is a “good” you need to calculate for that is external to yourself, even though determining which path leads to it in that case is very difficult and people will disagree on the right metrics to determine if we, in fact, reached the good (e.g. we saved n lives by removing 1, but we also killed m lives to do it). Either way, it implies there is a good to try to reach. The relativist position is neither option is good, and neither optional is evil. It doesn’t solve for the good in the first place. This is the root of most progressive and culture Marxist ideology. Internal metrics are all that factor in to the equation, not a higher ideal like the good. Unfortunately the internal metric in today’s weak and non stoic society is the most destructive metric possible: emotion and passions.
I never said man had some inherent ability by which he is able to always obtain the good in every situation, or is even capable of regularly desiring the good. I stated that either there is “good” or there isn’t “good” and being informed about the history of these two ideas that are in direct opposition to each other might tell you a lot about what we are seeing in society today, and have been for a very long time.
Their is either an objective evil and an objective good or there isn’t. I leave which philosophers, and later, cultural leaders/influencers, agreed with the former as an exercise for the reader.
Liberals can wish in one hand and crap in the other, see which gets filled up first
Trump knows what is at stake and knows these people 1000x better than we do. If he picks her, it’s for a reason.
I can tell from this soy boi teachers voice he is indeed desperate for anything with a D.
Yes, it’s exactly what these social justice minority groups say about white people (the white man keepin me down), but people like this are completely blind to the behavior in themselves. If you really want to know what groups are responsible for the communist indoctrination in this country look to who Trump is fighting as far as other govs go (CCP) He knows, he gets it. No group that isn’t a government is doing anything to you unless you live your life like an utter bitch with some mode of living in which that is even possible. It sure as hell isnt in my frame of reference. I choose my life.
Actually, society was doing a lot better in this regard when we had that thought process in the 90s. Liberals have just switched it to the opposite now because we gave them the power over the media and they don’t actually want minorities to do well, they just want their votes and they get them via division because they don’t have an actual platform. What you are espousing, at an ideological level, is exactly what liberals are espousing.
White values, especially post the enlightenment, value the individual not the collective. You aren’t espousing white values based on our philosophical history.
I am not either but I have family there and am up there quite a bit so I get to hear what’s going on up that way fairly regularly. It seems to be a very strange political mix outside the twin cities. You have staunch union dem voters that are legit racists and sexists but have very conservative values that will ONLY ever vote dem due to the unions and many of the conservatives have a hardcore libertarian streak. But...they are really hopeful, and think there is a really good shot for trump to flip it and that the Johnson votes prove it.
Considering how much of a long shot MN has always been I think it’s encouraging we could have a major pick up this year.
It was 45k votes but Gary Johnson got over 112k votes in the state of Minnesota. Unless assloads of people who voted libertarian are willing to vote for Biden (and Harris??), MN appears to be a state that should actually be favored for Trump based on 2016.
you demonstrate clearly you don’t know anything about the topic.
It’s a cult. It’s like the yearly predictions of Zorp destroying the planet in Pawnee.
No I didn’t. That’s really cool, thanks for letting me know
Have y’all considered that trump is aware he can shuffle those appointments around at a whim and thus, politics weighs heavily in to those decision, yet this isn’t the case with a Supreme Court nom and he does, in fact, realize it’s a lifetime appointment? Half of you want FOAM PARTY FUCK BOI RUBIO and his think tanks to win the argument and pick the seat!