1
The_Daydreamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Scientists today on the Covid shot: “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, SCIENCE-HATER.”

Scientists 75 years ago on leaded gasoline that is now proven to have killed 60 million people and poisoned scores of millions more: “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, SCIENCE-HATER.”

1
The_Daydreamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

…who saw something corrupt in his party at the last second, showed it to the world, and was martyred for it. Repentance is a thing that exists. Don’t be a purity-spiraling faggot.

5
The_Daydreamer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Salute Seth. One of the OG moments around which this community rallied.

His name was Seth Rich, and he died an American patriot.

2
The_Daydreamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

And so, to cap off the folly of it all—one more holocaust-causing blunder to add to the annals of Big Science—they are now dumping bioengineered mRNA therapies into the environment, where it will do who-knows-what. Get ready to see fish and small animals randomly showing up with spike proteins and prion diseases.

2
The_Daydreamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

How long do you give it before she does something deeply embarrassing to the institution? I expect the Roe leak will pale in comparison.

3
The_Daydreamer 3 points ago +3 / -0

So to stick it to the patriarchy, she’s denying sex to trans folk because of their bodies. What a TERF bigot! I sense a cancellation in her future.

0
The_Daydreamer 0 points ago +2 / -2

Or

Or

Don’t be a bleak corporate drone when you could be a married mother.

EDIT: HOES MAD

2
The_Daydreamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

You think men see you as nothing more than a pair of boobs and a vagina.

So you “free” yourself by swearing fealty to a corporation that sees you as nothing more than a pair of hands to type on its keyboards.

2
The_Daydreamer 2 points ago +3 / -1

It should just say YES as usual. Other than that, it’s perfect.

2
The_Daydreamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will never forget the pain I felt when this organization fell.

4
The_Daydreamer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fun isn’t something one considers when the fate of tens of millions of babies is at stake…but this does put a smile on my face.

1
The_Daydreamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Psychology is an actual battlefield and you are making a serious mistake by ignoring it. Nothing materially changes by doing it the way I said, except that suddenly, we have more of the moral high ground in the public eye.

1
The_Daydreamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Publicly funded education is fine under classical liberalism, as long as it’s the States that are doing it and not the Federal government (because the Fed doing it turns it into one grand incestuous redistribution and bloat scheme that eventually infringes liberty).

That can happen with the States, too, but since it’s a state and not the fed, it’s easier for the people to overturn it.

1
The_Daydreamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Libertarianism is not classical liberalism. George Washington was not a libertarian. Classical liberalism established a system in which each of the states could pass regulation for itself on issues that were important to its people. If one state banned weed and others did not, Jefferson and Franklin would say that the system is working as intended. Libertarians explicitly disagree with that idea.

2
The_Daydreamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Enabling humans to do what they want to themselves, with no consequences, is how we got San Francisco. It’s assisted suicide for the homeless and drug-addicted over there right now. Lolbertarianism is not the future.

0
The_Daydreamer 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, because married couples who stay together and have children do need to have tax breaks.

view more: Next ›