1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

I only wear it if the business requires me to. Big Gretch tries to make us wear one the moment we walk outside but we all refuse.

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of them are just a mass of lost people. They can be found frens

3
Thejudge6060 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not sure its 100% true but there is enough truth here to raise morale

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't yoda's line "luminous beings are we, not this crude matter" negate the entire LGBT mentality? Jedi are supposed to reject the physical world

5
Thejudge6060 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck it, make a fan made one and we'll all drive traffic to it. That will at least get you noticed by someone

16
Thejudge6060 16 points ago +16 / -0

Yeah, but it doesnt even fit within the lore of their own fiction. The jedi council would be telling the entire LGBT movement to stop focusing on the material world

6
Thejudge6060 6 points ago +7 / -1

Having been a marine, you may be fucked. That said, getting rid of you for such an innocuous question is going to red pill a lot of dudes in your platoon. Not much you can do now other than try to be as cool as possible with your fellow sailors and hope for the best

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

So hes not allowed to discuss something until he's done it. Sounds logic

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. So if he tries to see if those around him would join him, rather than going solo and guns blazing, he's a coward. The options you're giving him are coward or retard

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately these always read to me like "fuck, my plan a failed, may as well go with plan b"

0
Thejudge6060 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have no idea who he is or what he would do. You're right to caution against the glory of war, but everything else is just a call for the same complacency that got us in this mess.

10
Thejudge6060 10 points ago +10 / -0

Basically this. Any idea that we can debate and reason our way back has been proving false multiple times now. The options, as I see them, are civil war 2.0 or we just simply make it clear they can make up whatever rules they want, we just wont care.

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is when your only tool is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail...

I've never hit my kids, but I'm not jumping down the throat of someone who has. I recognize the difference between sharp discipline and senseless "ass beating"

2
Thejudge6060 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd argue that's okay though. We need to stop importing from China. Exports to China are good (in 90% of cases)

7
Thejudge6060 7 points ago +7 / -0

I mean, we could, as sovereign citizens, do the same if we really thought it was worth whatever consequences the Biden Admin imposed.

China needs exports to survive. The exports need ships. Theres nothing stopping a man unafraid of the consequences from performing a modern day tea party. Maybe making mini remote control submarines to drill holes in Chinese shipping ships? You're really only limited by your imagination

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because they felt like their women weren't on their side. Let's be real, men may have overt and obvious power, but history is full of examples of women manipulating men into using their power to do what a woman wants. How am I going to stand my ground on anything against my wife if she can, at any moment and any cause, say "well fuck you I'm out and taking the kids"

1
Thejudge6060 1 point ago +1 / -0

China makes subcomponents of too much stuff to ever fully boycott them, at least in the short term. We need to come up with another way.

Spit-balling ideas here, but would it be possible to pull a GME maneuver on the Yuan/Renminbi? Their trade surplus is dependent on keeping their labor cheaper than the US. Ideally we'd find a way to spike it

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›