1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

And at that point the porous borders would also make it a field day for foreign arms dealers selling (and foreign nations giving out free) heavy infantry weapons. I'd happily trade in a silver bar or two for a Carl Gustav M4 from some Canadian gun runner.

2
Thrasymachus 2 points ago +2 / -0

It does indeed give one the sense that the catastrophic history of apocalypse heaped on apocalypse heaped on apocalypse in Chinese history--with three thousand years of constant subjugation, humiliation, and wholesale slaughter--did ultimately have its cumulative effect.

5
Thrasymachus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trust me, it's not some CCP policy handed down from on-high that makes Chinese people comically racist. Ask them about the Japanese, or, better yet, ask them about blacks!

2
Thrasymachus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can attest that this is true. Want to add that not only is the amount of "work" actors have to do a joke, but they also literally break into tears constantly on set about how some imagined slight or obstacle is making it extra difficult to do that tiny bit of work.

2
Thrasymachus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I stick with traditional magazines (both STANAG and polymer) because drums just aren't reliable enough and don't carry well.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

the Constitution, properly understood, does not prevent Americans from enacting the gun laws they want and need to protect their families and communities, and it does not entitle people to weapons of war.

I wish extreme violence on these people with every fiber of my being.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biblical literalism: not even once.

7
Thrasymachus 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is a speech that handymen have heard eight billion times 🤣

Reminds me of this old comic.

78
Thrasymachus 78 points ago +79 / -1

You guys are missing the real Christmas Miracle here, which is the comments section: it's out of control in the best possible way. It's unlikely to survive the night but get in there while you can and bask in the glory. It's so good it almost makes the existence of this abomination worthwhile, if for no other reason than it makes apparent that increasingly huge swaths of the population are Onto Their Shit, mandatory Holocaust classes and seminars every year for fifteen years of school be damned.

3
Thrasymachus 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it takes you 30 minutes to stretch then your fat ass ought to have jogged.

But seriously, "It's just different, a unique approach to driving" is forced relativism. Electric cars are stupid because you can't fucking get anywhere long distance without massive stops. You'll be real good and stretched by the time your twelve-hour 120V charge is finished. Electric cars are stupid because software development is unreliable trash, but your whole car is now a piece of software. Electric cars are stupid because [Your License Number Has Been Selected To Drive On Even Numbered Days Only]. Electric cars are stupid because lithium and nickel aren't easy or impact-free to mine, and China effortlessly outmaneuvered us by simply buying off our worst politicians, and now we're not in a position to control our own supply of either.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is once they mandate electric only and shut down all the gas stations. I think my next car is going to be diesel, if only you could get anything worthwhile in diesel in the US.

5
Thrasymachus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lolbertarian hot takes are as inane and retarded as ever, but these days at least you get appropriately laughed at.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't say I'm really in a position to bring about a major discussion on these points; it's more a sense based on my understanding of history (which is not, dare I say, insubstantial) that events do not, in fact, repeat themselves: the context in which humans make decisions is always changing; only humans themselves, and their impulses and proclivities remain the same. That is relevant specifically with regard to your second point: unified a scant 40-odd years before being plunged into a catastrophic war and blockade (and then wracked by various varieties of direct communist agitation afterwards), the German economy in its sad state in the late 1920s bears very little resemblance to our own (Bolshevik designs on both notwithstanding). Though distressed as several sectors may be--some by shifting industrial fortunes and some by deliberate sabotage by way of economic treaty--the US economy is capable of supporting virtually limitless construction, revitalization, and military expansion simply through retrenchment of waste, prosecution of graft, and reevaluation of foreign agreements and commitments. We need no outside investment and require only that the shackles of foreign (and domestic) enemy intervention be removed for the actual prosperity the incredible technological advancements the latter half of the twentieth century created to have a chance to reach individual citizens that lack capital reserves (rather than being siphoned off by those with the ability to manipulate the mechanics of money supply). With regard to the funding of a political movement specifically, I point simply to the enormous amounts of money the uniparty GOP is able to raise with lies and then sequester for the continuation of their own loyal-opposition sham existence.

As to the first point, it is quickly becoming apparent that the lack of specific notation in our founding documents against explicit opposition to the continued existence of the nation not just specifically as envisioned, but even as loosely considered, was a catastrophic oversight. Without getting into the philosophical underpinnings of the definition of the modern nation state, and even leaving behind the extent to which it may be seen a function of its peoples or perhaps in contrast exists in some a priori state prepared to absorb anyone who is physically present (the latter being the farcical notion foisted on those unfortunate populations on the receiving end of limitless hostile immigration), we can likely agree that a state as a separate entity has some right to exist, and to attempt to continue to exist. We can even simplify to the point of ignoring the duties of a state (if any) to its citizenry. Thusly, I feel confident in saying that "liberty" to act against the very existence of a nation can be limited, or even removed in the event that these actions refuse, some by their very nature, to participate openly within a system of governance that already included a wide variety of built-in measures for facilitating change (even substantial change) without requiring subversion. These actors having made their intentions openly clear do not deserve liberty, and I will gladly remove it from them.

We can stop this without sacrificing who we are.

I consider this unlikely, but only in part; most citizens will not participate any extra-judicial political action at any level, for any reason (I believe this is hardly a bold statement considering how few even bother to vote). But the minority that do engage will need, in my estimation, harder hearts than perhaps you feel necessary. As for the rest, they can be made to accept that freedom to commit treason is not a freedom they will enjoy moving forwards, regardless of their money or connections. I do not believe this is a negative. Our commitment to freedom needs some shoring up insofar as its vagueness has, to now, set us on the path to our own ruin.

Perhaps because of the continued impact, conscious or otherwise, of a half-century of One-World "Antiracist" gaslighting mass "education" I feel compelled to point out that in spite of my vehement opposite to the former (as well as my hesitancy towards the perceived universality of some Enlightenment ideas that in truth have not actual survived the test of time particularly well), I'm not actually a monster, but these days I feel increasingly compelled to grant that I'd become one without regret in order that the masses never need to (in addition to getting to survive without experiencing communist genocide). I get the sense that while in the minority (for now), I'm also hardly alone.

Anyway, thanks for reading this novel; look forward to the Netflix adaptation coming soon with an exceptionally diverse cast and the exact opposite message

-3
Thrasymachus -3 points ago +3 / -6

Sleeper shill account activated fresh out of the tranny Discord supply closet with a le reddit tier post starting with "LMAO" (naturally) that includes the key phrase of the day: "literally the exact same as the Rittenhouse case".

Many such cases, in addition to the obvious cascade of handshakes. Use your judgement and don't be swayed by these pathetic jogger gobblers.

2
Thrasymachus 2 points ago +2 / -0

It can be safely assumed.

27
Thrasymachus 27 points ago +28 / -1

I respect your posts. But in this case, I respectfully disagree.

The goals of the Bolshevik left were extremely difficult to halt (or, as it turned out, slow) even with national collective action eighty years ago. The postmodernists, Fabians, Frankfurt School and Marxist International have only gotten far smarter, far more entrenched, and far better funded since then. I believe that it is only an incomplete understanding of the scale and scope of the problem that can allow an intelligent person to believe that libertarian resistance can provide anything more than the mildest speedbump to the relentless march of neo-feudal One World government. Our political environment is NOT the tribunes versus the Condor in some generic, never-ending Revolutionary cycle of concentrated vs. distributed government. Liberty cannot truly exist while a second, stealth network of politics exists within a nation solely for the purpose of destroying it, yet that shadow state cannot exist but for that same continued tolerance of its dormant slumbering. That makes what lingering freedoms we have left an omnipresent contradiction, one that is revealed as a falsehood in each new instance of the law being applied differently to "our" side versus theirs in the increasing number of venues that they now fully control.

By the time more people realize that they don't actually have individual freedoms entrenched in law left, yet ardent belief therein prohibited their support of any effective reactionary response, it will be too late.

6
Thrasymachus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Are you going to argue, on a conservative forum, that a community has no right to police itself?

Literally half this thread is comprised of morons arguing exactly that, interspersed with almost unbelievably pathetic posts amounting to "Please, please, please don't call me racist, if I use the phrase "good ol' boys" maybe I'll get MSNBC to reapprove my BIPOC-Ally Not Racist pass for another week!" It's frankly unbelievable how pozzed this thread is.

0
Thrasymachus 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm no longer surprised at all when I see utterly dysgenic faggotry written by your username. Why don't you try Reddit?

4
Thrasymachus 4 points ago +6 / -2

That's exactly the jury I would like to have been on.

11
Thrasymachus 11 points ago +12 / -1

Jesus, you're actually getting downvoted for this?

A lot of people here think they can The Law their way out of this, and may God have mercy on them when their ass is in a concrete hole in a secret prison with the key thrown away because they were so fucking stupid as to not see that there is no law; law is a collective agreement and collective agreements don't hold when half the citizens have been brainwashed and gaslit into wanting to kill the other half, and the state enforcement arm is a rogue occupational power representing foreign interests.

0
Thrasymachus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't ask this question; the writhing, moaning gud bois in this thread are going to every conceivable length to avoid it with legal jargon alongside the typical Please Don't Let Them Call Me Racist No Matter What Please Not That hand-wringing.

view more: Next ›