Called an "in kind" donation and must be official reported by campaigns
Baaaaa who are we kidding laws are legally selectively enforceable lol fun game they have
One could argue both cost the win - either way (checking signatures or checking machines) it's a huge narrative win.
That's not how you play this game. You're following the rules. Rules are for losers.
After all that ya'll still don't understand how this game is played? Narratives. It's about narratives and public opinion.
link + timestamp
Anything can happen if enough people decide to do something
Seems like New Mexico could be the first State to do a full hand-count + audit, considering Biden fucked them with a pen stroke. Kinda decent motivation to go back and check...ya know...just to be sure =)
depends on how long the secret plan has been secret. It's possible we all found out about it after it was already far enough along to make it impossible to stop.
that's how Chess works...in every case the loser doesn't see he has lost until it is too late, but the winner does.
Daniel 11:21
"Vile", or "Reviled" - despised, held in contempt.
"Intrigue" - make secret plans to do something illicit or detrimental to someone.
I'm willing to withhold judgement until he actually gives up control of the military.
Disagree. Release it & let We the People obtain justice. There is no "Official" channel through which this will ever happen. It must all be released if there is to be justice, regardless of "fallout", "laws", etc...
From what I've seen, most "trusted" experts also love this form of reasoning.
Yes, the proof works the same if they are primarily mail-ins as if they were primarily counted late. However, it's the late aspect that favors the narrative of filling out single circle ballots in a rush to close a gap, which is why I think we focus on that element. It may be easier to prove they were all mail-ins, though, so that would be perhaps just as good or better.
One "wording" caveat, though - if the 450,000 plus single-vote ballots for Biden came in bunches during overnight counts of anywhere near tens of thousands, it's way more than "likely" impropriety. The chances of legit votes coming in like that are about the same as someone flipping a coin 450,000 times in a row and getting heads each time.
There is this: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EfdGUM/weve-identified-450000-ballots-t/c/
I do not have the time data, that is why I made this post. Others do and/or can secure it. I'm just pointing the direction.
Yes, comparing Biden's to a Trump / 3rd party control is definitely a good idea.
I understand your concerns, but I assure you this is ALSO legal evidence that would absolutely stand up in court. That's included in the "statistical impossibility that these types of ballots would all come in late & at the same time".
This strategy just so happens to ALSO have the neat feature of being viral in its ability to relay a story, as opposed to most evidence, which most people just see as a bunch of little things that don't add up to much.
Yes, for those people, the Sherlock Holmes method (#4 above) works best.
That's why showing when those votes were counted makes all the difference. They can come up with an excuse for the total number, but not for why it is they all just happened to be counted at the end.
That's the key, that's the statistical impossibility.
Hey Joker, just trying to get this idea to the data guys (you may have thought of it already): stat analysis of when the Biden Only [No Down ticket] ballots were counted. If they filled them out late, counted them late, this will prove fraud, as in a normal count these would 100% be distributed evenly over the course of the counting.
I think this is a statty way to prove fraud that could be used much more effectively than most (like benfords) because laymen would understand the visual of people rushing to fill out one circle for Biden to make up for trumps huge lead, and they will not be able to imagine any other reason these would have all been counted late (because there isn't one)
No, that's when generic Biden Votes were counted.
I'm talking specifically about narrowing the scope to Biden only (no down ticket) ballots.
No, nobody has yet run stats on when the Biden only ballots were counted.
It is far more of a tell than even Benfords law, as benfords suggests fraud while this would prove it.
Yes, but if someone runs the numbers it's proof of fraud that people don't need a stats degree to understand, thus, powerful.
Moreso even than 90% for Biden because people accept "mail in + blue area = Biden skew x 2"
This would project strongly the image of small groups feverishly filling out a single circle over and over to try and cover trumps 400k vote lead.
yeah they didn't bother to go that deep. Nothing to see here. hero. please move along.