I highly doubt they use nano tech in this vaccine. That has not been approved....especially on this scale. It is however important to remember that this vaccine is an MRna vaccine....the first of its kind to be used on humans and on such a large scale. Its completely possible that this vaccine could cause "unknown" mental and behavioral issues since it was mainly short term physical reactions that were being studied during "trials". In theory, the rna strand could be coded to affect certain chemical productions in your brain or body. The word is this vaccine will be a bi-yearly injection.... Put 2 & 2 together and you see a formula that doesnt require a tinfoil hat to solve
I think we need to dissect that question into 3 parts.
1. Is the vaccine itself safe? No one really knows.
2. Is the vaccine effective relative to safety?
For certain age groups maybe. If you're young, I don't see a point. Again...no baseline to establish whether there's more harm than good.
3. Do you fully trust the government and large multi national health corporations?
The Tuskegee Experiment might be a valuable read for this one.
I don't get how people can't see the propaganda in that statement. The disconnect is unreal.
The people downvoting are the people who want to live in a fantasy of confirmation. Any opinion that could produce thoughts that might expose holes in that fantasy need to be rejected. We all do it to an extent. Its just really bad as of late due to the censorship. Probably doesnt help that the organization that signs Rubins biggest checks have the social media/influencer market for the new age conservative completely monopolized. They pick the winners and big tech nukes the "losers". Fun times.
Everyone has their favorite sports ball teams...and thats fine but we need to enjoy it as such. I feel like we lose sight of that and these grifters end up sucking away our energy. Most "sport ball teams" are doing it for the money and not the fans. Chances are if theyre still on youtube or they have an institutional backing (Shapiro, Kirk, Owens, etc) then youre watching someone who has silently agreed to toe the line (at your expense) in order to get paid. While they still sound based and redpilled from time to time, their message is actually pretty constrained and packaged within a given scope that is acceptable to the money interests that pull the levers on both sides of the aisle. The problem with this is it creates dogma talking points and messaging that comes off as mainstream and lackluster/lack of edge (ie culture wars, the dems are the real racists!, etc.) It usually ends up being on the same wave length as fox news which is something i think we all need to thoughtfully look at and evaluate.
Dave Rubin is probably fine...but trust him in the same way that Trump trusts the people around him (ie dont). Theyre all pawns in this game and theyre going to let you down.
It would impact counting via straight party ticket votes. If one candidate is listed as "repubiican", they will not be selected when choosing "republican" as your down ballot selection
You can format the text with a text selector. Basically a script that will only apply to a certain string. In this case, you would have a particular formatting script that looks for string instances of "ii" within the span of text and its told to capitalize the first letter of that string making it "Ii".
Edit: this script would not translate over when you copy/paste into a text editor etc. Thus why you see "ii" when you copy/paste since youre not copying the script. Youre only copying the raw text
Pay attention to how she worded that. We must come together (unite) and we must CHANGE... Remember that buzz word moving forward
Its how the CIA works for the CIA that makes it something more or something less.
Soros is the face they obfuscate with. They do this with other characters as well (Bill Gates being a big one as of late). Its like Orwell's 5 min of hate. Simply take the name of the agreed upon and all encompassing bad guy and then stick that face next to something youd like to destroy. In this case....getting conservatives to hate a censorship free social media platform.
Thats just a feed for data (edison) which the news sources use to report election updates in real time. Dominion wasnt hacked by any chans
I read that article. Doesnt really seem damning....i dont even like fox news. Tucker basically said that even if the uncovering of the fraud doesnt change the outcome...it should still be pursued. Spin that however you want and shill it in big, bold capital letters too. Youre not going to take down the undisputed king of primetime news. Tucker is our asset. Anyone saying differently is quite literally a media matters shill. Heres your sheckles loser. We're cutting the supply soon.
Fox News has never been on our side. Theyve always been ultra neo con. Theyre a gate keeper to a mainstream right wing which is honestly much much worse. They exist solely to provide the left with the gas for their political fires.
You know shits about to get real when (((they))) activate this asset
I havent honked this hard in a while
Im sure its fine. The website is an aggregator of reports though so i think people shouldnt submit NEW claims of fraud to them. Especially since this website isnt affiliated with any group or person. Looks to be anonymous.
Whats with all these hand shake accounts posting so many different links for submiting fraud tips? Its almost as if theyre trying to bury helpful tips from reaching those it needs to go to...
Edit: im not saying this site falls within those bounds. Im just saying we're combatting a lot of noise right now from not only disinfo...but grifters as well. Theres a lot of eyes on this situation right now and people will attempt to market off of it. Just keep a a critical eye on what you click, read, believe, and share.
Where else are you going to go? We wouldve been playing musical chairs with "platforms" for the last 2 years if no one put this site together the way it was put together. We would be completely fragmented and censored. Let this site be your marker for when the time has come. If the site gets taken offline...its time.
I disagree. We dont have to sell ourselves short just because everyones attention span is shorter than Joe Rogan. That only allows the media and the left a chance to downplay, obfuscate, and change the narrative. We need to throw every single documented fraudulent tactic used back into their face over and over again until they understand the picture that we're trying to show them.
•Statistical evidence of an algorithm within the voting software on dominion machines.
•Multiple "glitches" in multiple states....always going one way. Documented on both feed reporting as well as live TV reporting.
•Hundreds of precincts with over 100% voter turnout.
•Whistle blowers at the polls, post office, and software companies.
•Dead people voting.
•Video showing no chain of custody or protection of ballot boxes being delivered in the middle of the night.
•Not allowing verification of ballots at the polls
•Voter registry rolls in complete disorder (bad when you're doing mail in ballots)
•Video of poll worker training where they were being told how to cheat.
•Supreme court of PA overriding the state legislature and allowing ballots to be accepted after the election (unconstitutional)
There's more but that gives you a foundation to stand upon when someone says "baseless claims of fraud" or some other derivative of that talking point.
They need to produce a narrative that attempts to legitimize something that is illegitimate. There is MASSIVE amounts of documented evidence showing voter fraud (first hand, censorship, statistical, whistleblowers, etc). This election is illegitimate to anyone with a free thought and if they get away with it despite all of this, a large portion of the nation will be pissed. They will need an explanation (talking point) to inject into the consciousness of Trump supporters via shills and grifters like Ted Cruz. "Not a good legal plan of action" is probably one of many talking points theyre currently priming us with. Its essentially a psyop meant to demoralize you leading up to as well as after the climax of a presented timeline.
https://twitter.com/orijonal/status/1327277595583414274