1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

What definition of vaccine are you using?

31
TonsOfSalt 31 points ago +31 / -0

Even if they were actually attracted to them (they aren't), not being able to have a child is a legitimate reason to not be interested in dating. That's not bigotry.

3
TonsOfSalt 3 points ago +4 / -1

Given the fact that there are drive through vaccination services, we can all but guarantee precautions aren't being carried out for these potential allergic events.

At the particular facility where I got it, there was a large 15 minute holding area where people had to wait before leaving. My opinion wasn't based purely on the anaphylaxis I observed, but it also includes the severity of side effects that I found unacceptable among my peers. Most had standard side effects a bit worse than a flu shot, but some people got absolutely crushed by it. The 2nd dose gave me nausea so severe in the middle of the night that my abs were cramped up from dry heaving so hard. I was actually struggling to breathe I was throwing up so hard. I was thinking, "Man, if I was like 30-40 years older, this shit would have killed me." I just found out that one of my older family members got the 2nd vaccine and was having a rough time with it, and now they're being admitted to the hospital. So... yeah.

0
TonsOfSalt 0 points ago +1 / -1

You do realize that the companies don't have liability for regular established vaccines either, right?

2
TonsOfSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

It sounds like semantics to me. They did a safety study that justified EUA, which is obviously not going to be the same standards they normally go through for traditional approval. Emergency authorization implies that it otherwise would not have been approved under normal circumstances, but it is approved within the context of the "emergency".

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'd need to address each example individually, but I actually don't have much of a problem with the general claims they made there. They aren't factually inaccurate.

10
TonsOfSalt 10 points ago +11 / -1

I was a guinea pig and got the Pfizer vaccine 100% aware that long term side effects are unknown, but I deal with ultra sick COVID patients with high viral loads at my job and was bound to get it. So I basically weighed a shitty vaccine with a shitty virus. I see lots of people talk about mortality, like that's the only important thing. I met someone who got COVID at the very beginning, and they still cannot taste anything a year later. Long term side effects of the virus are unknown as well. Most people didn't bother to actually look at the trial results for the mRNA vaccines and parrot stupid false shit about it. I personally think the side effects of the vaccine are unacceptably high and cause an unacceptable risk of severe allergic reaction based on my personal observation. I know my anecdotes are "low level" evidence, but when you see lots of people go into anaphylaxis... I draw the line. Someone I know had to get a breathing tube put in because of the vaccine.

2
TonsOfSalt 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm not following your logic, even if we presume the vaccine 100% killed the person. It was a voluntary decision, and nothing Facebook said was inaccurate there. There is room for debate about what constitutes "extensively", but I find most people I discuss this with have no idea about the numbers involved in either the Pfizer or Moderna trials.

14
TonsOfSalt 14 points ago +15 / -1

This forum is full of retards who can't make legitimate criticisms of the vaccine (of which there are many).

People who haven't even done a cursory examination of the facts are obvious.

13
TonsOfSalt 13 points ago +14 / -1

The FDA gave Emergency Use Authorization. That is a form of approval, no?

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're proposing an excellent way to remove medical staff from hospitals and negate their ability to treat any sizable emergency.

You don't live under the "dictate" of doctors. You have the right to refuse treatment and leave AMA.

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah, I wouldn't accept that type of racist shit. I would openly reject it.

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Buy the stock then sell ITM calls on it to dump it at a lower price. Get paid while their shit goes down.

9
TonsOfSalt 9 points ago +11 / -2

Lame screenshot with no source?

2
TonsOfSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're just trying to get some token black people in charge to get ahead of the fact they kill endless black people to diabetes.

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Soda --> Beetus --> Renal Failure = Good

Cigarettes --> Emphysema --> Lung Cancer = Bad

19
TonsOfSalt 19 points ago +19 / -0

“Our staff are now being targeted with vile racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic slurs and degrading language from people outside of their school and nothing justifies the abuse directed at our educators,” the department representative reportedly said

Confirmed. Attack someone for their race, then accuse the angry people of being racist. lol

3
TonsOfSalt 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Our study simply gives yet another example of how racism gets into people's bodies and makes them sick, which can be added to this litany (of evidence for reparations)."

Honk fucking honk

view more: Next ›