These people do whatever, and say whatever, to "succeed" in their "career" or to be "popular" in their social circles. That's why they never argue on a philosophical basis but instead say things like "most people" or appeal to an authority.
That could have been for the best. Could have prevented another Comet pizza-type shooting happening among the crazies. We needed more executive action on certain things which didn't happen for whatever reason.
Let's face it, grassroots right has NO organization at all, with or without Qanon. What would they have done? Run for office? People silly enough to believe in Q would have damaged the movement by running for office more than they already have.
Agreed. All Q did was target people already predisposed to conspiratorial thinking and masturbatory activities. Q, although a HUGE annoyance with a lot of followers, doesn't turn intelligent people into morons which is a much bigger worry.
I don't think that was the intent. I think Qanon was probably somebody taking the piss, honestly. They were probably influenced by FBIAnon that occurred somewhat before Qanon's first post.
I don't think anybody who was into Q would have been a great help to the movement, regardless. They would have found another shitshow to gawk at.
I mean, it isn't terribly hard to figure out that Q was phony and after Sessions fizzled out, anybody sane-but-gullible would have left that behind. Instead, it just kept on the slower members of the herd.
Do the elites engage in pedophilia? Probably. Do they worship Satan? No, I don't get anything from them. Are they crooks? Absolutely. Traitors? You betcha. We didn't need Q for the truthful parts, and Q didn't really damage that part of dissident politics at all other than providing a degrading way for the left to paint the right, which they would do regardless.
Q was just masturbatory nonsense that got a few bumpkins riled up a bit more than they would have been at the capitol, but other than that, not a whole lot. I mean, look at who Q's victims were: 4channers and boomers, both groups are the least useful to any movement and most prone to not wanting to engage in serious activity. If anything Q might have just let everyone in the right know now that we have a large segment of crazy useless people and thus should be taken into account for future activities as do-nothings.
-
Left-wing "libertarians" create a group, likely at the goading of federal agents.
-
Left-wing libertarians create protests that largely agree with "the system."
-
MSM reports that it is a "far-right protest".
-
Federal agents send out bulletins warning of "far-right demonstrations" and "possible terrorist/violent acts."
This is how propaganda works. Keep it in mind, and fuck it up. Notice how they never warm about BLM/Antifa -- because BLM/Antifa is largely their own sons and daughters, and fellow travellers.
It'd be easier to sympathize with you people if:
You guys didn't constantly defame people. Back in 2005 you guys were calling Ann Coulter and Shawn Hannity nazis, and trying to say that Hal Turner was friends with Shawn Hannity. Fuck both of them for other reasons, but the lies were obvious.
You guys could handle civil disagreements on anything. You want to force people to live a certain way, anarcho-communist tyranny.
You guy work for the fucking mega-corporations and huge corporate entities. Seriously. You want to talk shit about MAGA people all you want, but we have more balls than you because we have to stand up versus bigger enemies.
Your movement has had FBI involvement since the beginning. Ask Daryle Lamont Jenkins why he was telling Erica Hoesch he wanted to work with the FBI and SPLC in one of his emails that I read after I hacked his forums and email.
Don't give me the fucking "anti-fascist only" part, anarcho-communism is a core to antifa and only idiot liberals buy that propaganda. Meanwhile you guys get the corporate funding and worshipping interviews on MSNBC and CNN.