Boom Tetris for Jeff

Nothing. They already picked a side. To admit they certified fraud would be signing their own death warrant (immediate criminal charges would follow)

If you switch a vote you do both -1 to trump and +1 to biden. Total shift=2.

If you start with 100 votes each and switch one from trump to biden you end up with 99 trump 101 biden. Total difference 2. Add to that the one lost and you get 3%

Legally calling your representatives and telling them to repeal section 230.

Illegally ddos and hacking

Not until section 230 is repealed. When it gets repealed you'll be able to

It was 1 vote not counted. 1 vote switched from Trump to Biden. Switching a vote counts as two because you both remove a vote from Trump and add one to Biden. Total shift is 2 votes. Not counting counts as 1. Total error=3%. He's 100% right

Fingerprint verification works like this: you put your finger in a chemical solution after voting that stains your finger blue for a few days. The color can't be washed or bleached off. That way if you try to vote again your finger will already be stained so they'll know you already voted. Of course this means elections can't last more than 3 days. You don't mark the ballot itself, you just stain your finger

Alex gets things either horribly wrong or absolutely right. No inbetween. Mostly the second

I am gonna call bullshit on this one. PEG is everywhere. It's so incredibly common that had 70% of test subjects become allergic to it we would have had people dying in the streets left and right.

Not to mention the fact that PEG is already widely used in medicine as a laxative and as a thickening agent for syrups. You don't become allergic to it because you take too much. You get diarrhea if you take too much because it acts as a stool softener.

Also the way the first post is worded sounds like "we don't think it does but we're also not 100% sure it doesn't and we can't take any chances" which is basically the same as saying "we know there could have been fraud in the election but we can't be 100% sure there was so we'll say there isn't any"

Also the wording in the second tweet could mean people independently become allergic to PEG and already are when taking the vaccine which is why it could be dangerous. But if that's the case we'd have to have people dying left and right when drinking syrup. Which isn't the case. There's a lot more PEG in any medicinal syrup than in a vaccine. But people don't die left and right from syrup.

I mean, the whole reason why we use PEG instead of gelatin is because there are more people allergic to "natural" gelatin than there are allergic to PEG.

Overall it sounds fishy to me. Obviously you'll have to make up your own mind. But trust me if 70% of people developed a PEG allergy it would be too many to go unnoticed even if you were trying to hide it.

You'll have to choose between moderating everything or nothing. Easy choice

0/10 no bagpipes

Still here.

There's no "grand plan" like some people think. But there is a plan in the sense that there is a planned sequence of actions by Trump and his lawyers and his advisors on how to best challenge the fake results.

I wouldn't bet on that. However i'm not at all surprised he was misquoted and taken out of context. It's what the media does

If you believe that the same media that distorted statements for 4 years hasn't done so now you're a fool.

If you believe Barr was suddenly gonna do something useful you're also a fool.

Or how about this: maybe both his statements were exaggerated AND they were poorly researched to begin with. They're not mutually exclusive and imo the most likely outcome

I mean... I'm surprised anyone thought barr would be useful. To the best of my knowledge he's always been useless. And your (quite heated) reaction makes me think that after all you too had some faith in him or at least a strong will to be proven wrong about him.

Any Larp is a larp unless confirmed. No matter how good or bad it is for you. If you were doubtful about the server in Germany before it was confirmed you weren't stupid. You were a reasonable person.

Now i'm sure that his actual statement was exagerated by the media (as always) so that too should be considered, but regardless, everything needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

That also doesn't mean don't speculate, speculation is what leads to research and confirmation or denial.

Getting angry at memes...

You do understand what a joke is right?

Remember the good old days when we could freely joke about anything without asking the fun police for approval?

Of course the media has it all planned, but there's a problem: they'll run out of smears far sooner than we'll run out of evidence. They try to cover it up, but they're on the last gasp. What do they have left?

All rinos already spoke. All obama intelligence agencies already spoke, all governors already spoke. All voting companies spoke. Everyone spoke. At the top of my head i can't think of anyone else they could get to speak without looking like fools.

They're pretty much out of people they can interview, but we're not. Why do you think we keep pressing on an on with testimonies, hearings, press conferences and all that? I mean these past two days we produced over 10 hours of materials per day. And there'll be more to come all week. We're forcing them to use all their options now to cover the massive evidence so they'll be depleted by Saturday. Remember what happens on Saturday? They'll have nothing else to talk about anymore. The only thing left to talk about will be Trump's gigantic rally.

As i said in another post: there's just one reason why you'd do it: you're hiding something bigger. What that could be? Idk. But if you're willing to lose a court case by defying a court order, a case that will flip the state then the contents of the drives must be really really explosive

Openly defying a court order? It's a guaranteed lost case in court. Only reason why you'd do it is because you're hiding something bigger than the case at hand.

Basically they admit to this fraud to hide something bigger. I can't even imagine what that could be...

His "base" is lobbyists and foreign nations. He's bought and paid for. He can't allow a serious audit. He'll be found out and put in jail. He has to defend his fraud cause it's his only hope of avoiding jail.

We're basically asking a thief permission to look in his pockets. Why are we surprised he won't let us?

As if they haven't called him a dictator and a fascist for the last 4 years...

Any destoryed evidence shifts the burden of proof to defendants. If the evidence that's been alleged to have been destoryed isn't given to the court by the defendants the allegations made by plaintiffs are considered true.

Nope. That was bullshit invented by communists. The reason why everyone gets censored can be blamed in part on copyright law (DMCA and similar) and in part because companies can't be sued due to section 230 (to be precise a bad interpretation of it)

So you have chosen: death. I mean for real you have to be quite dumb to put your signature on fraudulent papers.

You're basically admitting you're in on it.