The people arguing this are the same ones counting votes.
My opinion is that BLM is a thuggish group intent on pushing the edge of politically motivated violence and intimidation. They stoke racial hatred.
I’d be happy if they changed their message to one of harmony and appreciation for our beautiful country. Somehow that seems unlikely.
She crushed that Texas star!
DC is covered in snow right now.
Where is the snow?
Whisky Tango Foxtrot
Delisting will happen in 3 years IF the Chinese companies do not comply with USA accounting methods and standards.
It may be that big companies like BABA choose to comply with these accounting standards. Or they may be delisted and only available on other exchanges such as Hong Kong.
If you are holding shares at the time of a delisting there would likely be a process to transfer your shares to a foreign exchange.
Panic selling your stock is not recommended. Make an informed decision.
Trump campaign lawyers need to be overseeing how the ballots are being selected (to prevent biased or pre-planned choices) and need to be able to scrutinize each and every ballot and have the opportunity to object over signature matching of any ballot.
This is basic fairness and transparency and is similar to what was allowed in the 2000 Bush v Gore recounts. Each side had a representative who got to object to interpretations of voter intent.
Without Trump campaign involvement this is absolutely meaningless.
Without Trump campaign direct oversight of the signatures this is meaningless.
Asking the crooked people to check a third time is idiotic.
Or a process where representatives from each campaign can challenge signatures. Putting a liberal university in charge of it while Nancy Pelosi is teeing up a university bail-out bill is RIDICULOUS.
Hey look off in the distance is a blue haired poll worker rubber stamping signatures!
What a farce.
Trump campaign needs to be able to see and if appropriate challenge EVERY SIGNATURE for match. Otherwise it’s just recounting the same shit. Leaving matches to the judgement of whatever hyperpartisan dem is hired by the left is outrageous.
The legislature needs to declare no confidence in this election.
The media is the Dems’ Geheime Staatspolizei.
It’s what terrorizes republicans into collaborating with Dems.
It is what keeps all the Dems in lockstep.
It is a potent weapon that we have continually underestimated.
I thought that Trump showing behind the curtain that the media was all lies would sap their power. But the media has managed to convince people to follow their lies despite knowing them to be lies. To impeach a president over something everyone knew to be false. To support an election result they know to be fraudulent.
The media is the heart of democrat power. I am hopeful there is a non-violent way to neutralize this corruption.
Looks like a vagal reaction. Seen it many, many times.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/vasovagal-syncope/symptoms-causes/syc-20350527
It looks to me like she had a vagal reaction.
I see it frequently in people getting any kind of shot or even in people watching someone else get a shot.
Their blood pressure drops, pulse drops, and they faint.
Usually fine just by laying them down and elevating their legs.
The idea that the vaccine is some super poison that caused her to faint immediately is silly. She had a vagal reaction. It irritates me when we promote material that we like even if it is wrong or misleading. I know the other side does and so we think we have to do it as well.
Signature check needs to be an adversarial process with Trump campaign lawyers and Biden campaign lawyers able to object over matches.
Anything other than an adversarial process with active involvement from both campaigns is a farce.
Would it? I’m not sure the will to preserve the Union is what it was in 1860.
More people than not believe the election was stolen.
Unless this is thoroughly investigated in a public, timely, transparent manner satisfactory to both sides, we are headed for turbulent times.
Adjudication is essentially voting in someone else’s name.
There MUST be a representative from each campaign reviewing every adjudicated vote. Allowing Susie the blue haired poll worker to decide the votes of thousands of citizens with no adversarial oversight is pure election fraud. Adjudication without oversight is fraud plain and simple.
Best justice of my lifetime.
Your doctor or nurse is stuck in the same hell you are.
over the last 5 years, I have learned to trust evidence, not people.
All Lin needs to do is produce the evidence that convinced him, and perhaps it will convince me also.
But apparently he cannot because reasons. Just like the fake news cannot name sources because reasons.
Sorry, but it’s too late in the game for the plan to be forming. It’s do or die time. Even if Roberts said this thing, the only result would be that conservatives would demand he recuse himself from future rulings on the election but there is no criminality to him hating Trump.
There are a thousand ways to publish anonymously on the internet. There are ways of getting this out if the issue was that the recording was illegally obtained or to protect a source.
Lin obviously wants this is the public sphere. But if it can never be revealed to protect sources then it’s worthless hearsay.
Lin Woods’ behavior makes no sense.
If you are going to make an public announcement of corruption on part of the Chief Justice of the USA, and you expect to be taken seriously, you had better present more evidence than “trust me.”
This is the kind of anonymous source tactic the fake news uses. An emotional entreaty devoid of supportive framework.
If people cannot support their public declarations with actual evidence, they should shut up until they can. It’s basic, fundamental logic.
Yep. This is the same as an “anonymous source.”
I like that Lin Wood is fighting for Trump and I am naturally predisposed to believe and support him.
Nevertheless, fake news has cured my of ever believing in anonymous sources again. If you have evidence but you cannot reveal it or it’s source in public, don’t announce it publicly. Because people have learned to only trust evidence.
Vote of No Confidence in this election.