Hang on, hang on pedes. "This claim about election fraud is disputed." So, the Nazis at Twatter say it isn't true. I guess it's all made up then. :P
If only there were a way to share a video with your fellow pedes so they'd know wtf you're talking about. That would be pretty cool, huh? Too bad it's only 2020 and we don't have that technology yet...
Hah. It's a bug in the thedonald.win. It links to a video but doesn't bother to indicate that a video is linked. Got it. Brilliant.
Punk, I graduated from college before you were born.
Care to share it? Or you comfortable just telling us that it exists?
Oops. Thanks for the downvotes. Here's some back at you. :)
There is only one protection in Section 230. It prevents the internet companies from being sued for publishing something that might be false/defamatory. That's the only reason Section 230 exists.
Fact: 'Then' and 'Than' are different words and you got them wrong.
he was saying if the vote rigging isn't fixed NOW, there is no way they can win!
At best, this is ambiguous. At worst, it's dead wrong.
I think what he meant to say was, "if the vote rigging isn't fixed NOW, there is no way they[the Dimocrats] can be defeated!"
Brian Kemp is the governor of Georgia.
There's only one protection offered by Rule 230. It prevents you from filing suit against the content provider. (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) The assumption was that the content provider would act as a "platform", and not censor content, and not be liable for the content published. Instead, they censor people, and can't be sued. They're acting as a publisher, not a platform.
Your solution does not work, just so we're clear. If you hold the content providers liable for what the people say, then they go out of business, or they censor content.
Agreed, but not just Dominion machines. The counts should be hand counts in front of cameras or they don't count towards election.
I'm all for deporting the traitors, but let's not be killing any cats. It's not their fault.
Emoticons are used to express emotion, which is lost in plain text. ;) Get it, dumbass? Learn how to internet, moron.
So, I think you're missing the point. They're going to remove the protections of Section 230. So, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram will still exist, they just won't be able to censor people any more. After their Rule 230 protections are removed, if they censor you, you'll be able to sue them and put them out of business.
I promise you that you can go into the grocery stores without a mask. They are required here, and I never wear one when I go into a grocery store. Tell them you have a medical condition that prevents you from wearing one (asthma, for instance).
I know negative and positive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjTOSDZ0BE
-22.26 and -25.00?
But that's assuming that it doesn't go to the Supreme Court, who would then announce that each state would get to send 1 elector to the electoral college, resulting in Trump winning by a landslide. And this can happen any day right up until the day the president elect takes office on Jan 20th.
clutch?
Until what?
Agreed, but he's got to deport a lot of people....Bill Barr is swamp. CIA. FBI. NSA...they've all got to go. They're subverting the duly elected president. Time to clean house. Bigly.
Agreed. Until I saw this speech today, I really hadn't heard from him since the election. This is the Donald Trump we voted for. The one we deserve. His speech gives me confidence that he's not going to go down without a fight. We've got less than 2 months, pedes.
Did you find the video? I'm not clear where it is (or why it isn't here).
I'll pass. Not that interested in it. But it would be easy for OP to link to a video if he wants people to see it.