1
TrumpianEagleLOL 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude it seems the data in here is wrong. It’s not Michigan but Minnesota... can you recheck

1
TrumpianEagleLOL 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm that makes sense, but then this would mean the court may "laugh, it out of court". Ellis said some judges never allowed to be presented, why is that?

Note: Media reported that it was thrown out.

1
TrumpianEagleLOL 1 point ago +1 / -0

So this thing that we can view would also contain the EVIDENCE right?

3
TrumpianEagleLOL 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do we get to see it when she files it? And read it? Or do we have to wait?

If it gets rejected, does she have the option of climbing till scotus? If she does why would SCOTUS deal with it differently than the other courts.

Hoping for the best, Thanks!

1
TrumpianEagleLOL 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahah yes I get that, but what does dont read this affidavit form an IT expert?

1
TrumpianEagleLOL 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do not read this affidavit from an IT expert. We know what is documented here is impossible as the Maricopa County Supervisors told us everything is fine and go back to sleep and pay your taxes and wear a mask. And leftist reporters told us to move on.

Can somebody tell me what this means? The affidavit looks good.

1
TrumpianEagleLOL 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the Demonrats pretended to listen to us, and maybe gave us a tiny win such as removing a very small number of ballots, maybe it would have been harder for us to appeal.

what did you mean here then?

2
TrumpianEagleLOL 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the rejections are a good thing. And all evidence would be presented there?

2
TrumpianEagleLOL 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im starting to hope its part of the plan because well why else would they MAKE this statement? But why make this statement?

9
TrumpianEagleLOL 9 points ago +25 / -16

I get what he is saying here but in the comments, they claim that Michigan results have been certified.

view more: Next ›