God bless y’all. True Patriots at work. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Are there other teams doing the same data analysis in other states behind the scenes that you know of?
I know Bobby Piton is working on reverse engineering data sets and doing some other data analysis but was just curious if there were others teams like y’all as well.
Regardless of the exact dollar figure, I believe we can all agree to remove the BS spending. AMERICA first! Especially, when AMERICAN people/family’s are suffering. Why is that even in there for a COVID relief bill? Who in their right mind who vote for this senseless financially irresponsible fuckery with AMERICAN tax payer dollars? What a slap in the face to the AMERICAN people. How’s about we give as much money as reasonably allowable to the AMERICAN people who need it so our economy can survive. This would increase our likely hood of continuing to be a strong charitable economy in the long run. Now is not the time to be sending AMERICAN money outside of AMERICA.
Here is a link to what he’s explaining.
I’ve researched this issue and I even called Georgia’s government (SOTH) to ask about documentation on how the alternate elector process went down/minutes from the meeting that performed and sent in the alternates. No reply/callback.
It is my understanding that the purpose of sending alternate electors is to challenge what has been certified. The electors sign and the governor certifies via certificate of ascertainment (normally). The electors that would have sent in the alternate electoral votes for Trump would have been the legitimate electors that were ready to go had Trump won the popular vote in GA (not saying he didn’t) as I’ve read most are already designated prior to Election Day. To me, if the alternate electors are a designed mechanism to challenge in the case of cheating/fraud/corruption, it wouldn’t make much sense that they had to be certified to be a legitimate challenge? Bc what if that was the corrupt portion you are trying to challenge? It would never get past the very corruption they would be trying to challenge? Someone please correct me if I’m misunderstanding this process. I’d like to understand it.
Paul tells us in Corinthians that certain sins will keep you from inheriting the kingdom? Gal. 5:4 also tells us that " You are severed from Christ; you who would be justified by the Law; you haven fallen away from grace." You cant be severed from something if you were never connected in the first place?
The thief on the cross has a handful of issues to support such a bold claim.
1-The new covenant was not fulfilled yet.
2-How do we know he wasn't baptized, produced no good works before in his life, repented when he asked Jesus? The bible doesn't say he did and doesn't say he didn't?
3-How did he know Jesus was innocent, that he was the Lord, and he was going to his Kingdom when he died? He seems to have the knowledge that was given to the disciples (Matthew 13: 10-11)
Also, the Pope stems from Jesus handing the lead over to Peter, Peter the rock, You have to have an authority in any system that has requirements.....or you will have what we are doing right now until the end of time. Who can judge between us right now if we agree to disagree? God? It would be too late at that point, and pointless.
Purgatory also has scriptural evidence.
The rosary is a tool used to ask Mary to pray FOR us as sinners. Veneration not Adoration. Asking the dead who have lived very Holy lives on earth to pray for us while they are looking down on us in Heaven is also supported by scripture. You may have to look into Catholic apologetics to quickly get to the supporting scriptures rather than go dig for yourself.
I would encourage you to pick the differing areas where Catholics and Protestants differ and put all the relevant scriptural evidence in front of you before you form a conclusion. If you use deductive reasoning with ALL relevant information, I believe you would be surprised. Like I was saying, Catholic apologetics would be a great source to find all the supporting scriptures on a certain differing topic.
We will just have to agree to disagree. I wish you well on your Christian journey. Have a merry Christmas friend and God bless.
Right, so if someone said they “have been saved” but their life looks essentially no different than before, then it’s obviously a 2 part process. #1-Faith in Christ and all the teachings he left for us in scripture (enough Faith to motivate one to desire to put forth effort)
2 - Using that effort/energy/gifts of the Holy Spirit to do good fruitful works. For if you produce no good fruit you will be gathered up and throw in the fire. You can be filled with the Holy Spirit and still falter like you stated. You have to “work” to hone yourself so you do not become complacent. Just like people who have been “saved”, became good people filled with the Holy Spirit, then returned back to their old ways shortly thereafter.
Saying that “faith alone” is all that is required is deceptive and gives people the false impression that all they have to do is “believe” in Christ and their sin (past and present) is forgiven regardless of effort. Increase of effort means doing work. Hence, the 2 part process. “Faith” is faith in Christ AND what he said we have to do (ie-produce good fruit/works)
I find it extremely hard to believe that all you would need to do is “have faith alone” and try your best afterwards to do what you feel is enough in order to attain eternal salvation. If that were the case ....
1 - the New Testament could be reduced to a page.
2 - I would think the Catholic Church would have done away with all the strict criteria (which is based on scripture and sacred tradition passed down from the apostolic line and early church Fathers) if it wasn’t absolutely necessary. After all, the whole point is to bring people in to Christianity, not deter them with unnecessary rules based on teachings and traditions? It would be counter productive to the entire cause.
Thank you, by the way, for the dialogue. I truly appreciate it.
Just doesn’t make sense. If doing good works (producing good fruit such as in the parable of the Talents) is irrelevant towards receiving his gift of salvation and not being thrown out where there will be wailing and nashing of teeth, why not just accept Jesus as my Lord and Savior, become “saved”, and then do whatever the hell I please? Why bother wasting time and effort doing good works if I’ve already received the golden ticket?
Just curious, what if the few different teachings (traditions/rules) Catholics try to strictly abide by are extremely significant in the eyes of the Lord? And we are questioned about them when the time of Judgment is upon us? After all, if they stem from some of the earliest church teachings, wouldn’t that give them a high degree of credibility (reasonable assurance) having been found to be orally taught or written at a time closer to Christ? If they are supported by what’s been written (scripture and early church writings) and what’s been practiced, why would it be safe to neglect or say I don’t really have to follow because ~1500 yrs later someone said we can interpret scripture individually?
Does he mean “drop” or “dump”?